Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

ranger Vs. dakota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 03-12-2004, 02:04 AM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,693
Received 1,354 Likes on 1,113 Posts
We have a 98 Ranger with the 4.0 engine and auto o/d. No problem to pull a 65 Mustang on a car trailer at hiway speeds. Power is not a problem.
 
  #17  
Old 03-12-2004, 10:49 AM
jonathoncounts's Avatar
jonathoncounts
jonathoncounts is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Steelville Missouri
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I owned a 2000 Dodge Dakota with a 4.7 and a 1997 Dakota with a 5.9 the 4.7 is much quicker and more powerful thatn the 5.9. Tru the gas mileage is not the best in a dodge 4.7. I now own a 4.0 Ranger and a 5.7 Hemi the 4.0 has plenty of power to do what your want to do with it and better gas mileage.
 
  #18  
Old 03-12-2004, 02:51 PM
99 ranger bob's Avatar
99 ranger bob
99 ranger bob is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: formerly Brooklyn NY now
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a ford ranger and while ive never owned a dakota id never buy another dodge product. I have a dodge caravan i bought second hand that has been nothing but a problem... its one of four caravans i have owned over the last ten years and frankly one has been worse than the next. the warrantys are useless as i drive more rentals than the van. i dont mean to sound like im flaming dodge here but i can document everything i say here. Go with the Ford way more reliable and mine has 85K on it
 
  #19  
Old 03-12-2004, 03:59 PM
1956MarkII's Avatar
1956MarkII
1956MarkII is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Safety Harbor, FL USA
Posts: 7,745
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dakota: all the disadvantages of a small truck (about the same head and leg room as a Ranger), combined with all the disadvantages of a large truck (lousy gas mileage). This is one truck that has never made any sense to me.
 
  #20  
Old 03-13-2004, 08:09 AM
Delta's Avatar
Delta
Delta is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central IN
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1956MarkII,

I agree and it looks like Toyota is doing the same thing with the Tacoma. I guess they don't believe we need small trucks anymore.
 
  #21  
Old 03-15-2004, 01:43 AM
Dave76's Avatar
Dave76
Dave76 is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: idaho
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive a 03 ranger fx4 everyday and i love it. When i get on it the power is pretty good, not enough to squeal the tires but a definate kick in the butt. I have the 4.0 supercab 5 speed auto fx4 package and I get almost 17 mpg, but thats with just 5500 on the ticker. Off roads pretty good as well.
 
  #22  
Old 03-15-2004, 10:36 AM
makealoop's Avatar
makealoop
makealoop is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm a big fan of crash test results. If you look at iihs.org, you'll see that the Dakota is rated 'P' for poor.
 
  #23  
Old 03-16-2004, 09:28 AM
AceTheLegend's Avatar
AceTheLegend
AceTheLegend is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the 03 XLT FX/4 Level 2 ranger with the 4.0 and I get 17 or better on the highway when I am not going like 80 mph! I love it and I can squeal my tires, sorry dave76 but i can! But all I know is that everyone I have every talked too have always said go ford or chevy because dodge pretty much isn't good from truck stand point! I love my ranger, has plenty of get up and go, good gas mileage, nice to look at, enough power, and who wouldn't want that!
 
  #24  
Old 04-30-2004, 11:02 AM
KCFD408RT's Avatar
KCFD408RT
KCFD408RT is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jonathoncounts
I owned a 2000 Dodge Dakota with a 4.7 and a 1997 Dakota with a 5.9 the 4.7 is much quicker and more powerful thatn the 5.9. Tru the gas mileage is not the best in a dodge 4.7. I now own a 4.0 Ranger and a 5.7 Hemi the 4.0 has plenty of power to do what your want to do with it and better gas mileage.
Actually you have no idea with you are talking about. Dodge didn't put the 5.9 aka 360 into the Dakota until 1998 in the R/T. If you had a 1997 Dakota with a V8 the only motor you could have would have been the 5.2 aka 318. Plus the 5.9 is more powerful then the 4.7....5.9 has 250 bhp...345 ft. lbs. of torque. The 4.7 has 235bhp and 290ft. lbs. of torque. The 4.7 is rated at 16 mpg. My fathers 2001 Ranger 4X4 Edge only gets 16-17 mpg.
 
  #25  
Old 04-30-2004, 11:04 AM
KCFD408RT's Avatar
KCFD408RT
KCFD408RT is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by makealoop
I'm a big fan of crash test results. If you look at iihs.org, you'll see that the Dakota is rated 'P' for poor.
Whats the Ford rated.........
 
  #26  
Old 04-30-2004, 11:07 AM
KCFD408RT's Avatar
KCFD408RT
KCFD408RT is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1956MarkII
Dakota: all the disadvantages of a small truck (about the same head and leg room as a Ranger), combined with all the disadvantages of a large truck (lousy gas mileage). This is one truck that has never made any sense to me.
The 4.7 gets just about the same MPG as a 4.0 Ford......Plus its a lot quicker.

I personally went with the 5.9....I can care less about MPG.
 
  #27  
Old 04-30-2004, 11:08 AM
KCFD408RT's Avatar
KCFD408RT
KCFD408RT is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gilraine
I'm considering buying either a 2001 dakota sport (4.7, 5 speed, 4x4 and clubcab)or a 2004 ranger(4.0,stick, 2 door supercab and 4x4)... price is about the same, monthly payment wise. I just want to know which would work better for me... I just will carry hay and building supplies with it and wheel them a little... towing at most 3K twice a year..
Here is my advice. Go and test drive both before you make you choice. I've owned 4 Dakota's. My father has a 2001 Ranger 4x4 edge with teh 4.0...I hate driving it.
 
  #28  
Old 04-30-2004, 12:57 PM
WXboy's Avatar
WXboy
WXboy is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Central KY
Posts: 3,355
Received 342 Likes on 208 Posts
You are joking, right? My buddy's new 4.7L gets such horrible mileage that he took it back to the dealer because he thought there was something wrong with it. They said "nope, that's normal". My 4.0L turned 19.6 mpg on the last tank. You could turn the Dakota off and coast downhill and you'd never get that kind of mileage. And with a simple computer chip, the Ranger will make identical power to the 4.7L Dakota too. You guys can have your V8s...I'm through with them.
 
  #29  
Old 05-01-2004, 02:19 PM
KCFD408RT's Avatar
KCFD408RT
KCFD408RT is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WXboy
You are joking, right? My buddy's new 4.7L gets such horrible mileage that he took it back to the dealer because he thought there was something wrong with it. They said "nope, that's normal". My 4.0L turned 19.6 mpg on the last tank. You could turn the Dakota off and coast downhill and you'd never get that kind of mileage. And with a simple computer chip, the Ranger will make identical power to the 4.7L Dakota too. You guys can have your V8s...I'm through with them.
A simple chip huh....I'm sorry but a simple chip will not get you an extra 30 bhp.

I know thats what the company says but everyone knows that a chip might get you about 10 bhp. Plus it wont even come close in torque. The 4.7 will get about 16mpg which isn't bad. My 5.9 gets 14.3 and the Supercharged 408 gets close to the same. If your going to bitch about MPG maybe you should by a 4-cyl. but everyone knows there is NO replacement for displacement. A stock 4.7 Dakota reg. cab 5-speed will run around 15.0 @ 90 mph in the 1/4 mile.....lets see your 4.0 V6 with a chip do that.....your looking at high 16s best. If you want we can line our trucks up and see if your really making V8 power.
 
  #30  
Old 05-01-2004, 03:29 PM
1956MarkII's Avatar
1956MarkII
1956MarkII is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Safety Harbor, FL USA
Posts: 7,745
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tacoma and Ranger/ B-Series were rated highest with an "acceptable" rating.
 


Quick Reply: ranger Vs. dakota



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.