4.2 performance

  #1  
Old 02-12-2004, 05:20 AM
duff man's Avatar
duff man
duff man is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.2 performance

i was curious if any1 has experiance porting the stock heads? also ive read some threads on roller rockers some said they used mustang style rollers. im assuming pedestal mount? what ratio is the 4.2?
302ho mustang is 1.6.since there really arent any cams to choose from would 1.7 rockers work better with ported heads? any valve clearance probs or coil bind with 1.7 ratio? also does any1 know the stock valve size on the 4.2?
thanks for your replies!
 
  #2  
Old 02-12-2004, 06:39 AM
sigma's Avatar
sigma
sigma is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are several companies that sell ported heads for our engine, but I do not know anyone who has tried them. To take full advantage of ported heads you would also need to upgrade the cam to maximize flow.

If I remember correctly, the stock rockers are 1.73 and the typical upgrade is to 1.80 ratio rollers. No problems with valve clearance or stock springs from the change. While this is a cool mod, you will probably only see a couple HP improvement from the small increase (0.020”) in lift the RR give you. Far more substantial gains can be had if you bundle a cam + springs + roller rockers. There are quite a few options for street and street/strip grind cams for our engine. Gains of 20 to 40 HP are easily achievable without sacrificing dependability or daily drivability.
 
  #3  
Old 02-12-2004, 09:01 AM
true4.2's Avatar
true4.2
true4.2 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lufkin
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sigma is correct. 1.8 RR's are the upgrade for our trucks, but you won't notice a thing if you aren't already pushing some high hp's.
 
  #4  
Old 02-12-2004, 11:16 AM
V6Mustang's Avatar
V6Mustang
V6Mustang is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a couple companies that sell ported stock heads. Unfortunately nobody makes aftermarket heads for us
Those same companies also make cams that will work for your 4.2. You might want to email them about your setup and let them pick the best cam for you. 1.73 is the stock rocker ratio, and if you do decide to go with a reground cam then there really is no need to switch to 1.8's (although you still might want to switch to roller rockers). If you decide to just go to 1.8's you won't have any problems with coil bind, but if you decide on getting a reground cam new springs are always recommended to avoid bind and valve float.
Stock intake valve size is 1.86", exhaust valve is 1.45". I know RPM-Mustangs sell big valve heads with 1.94" intake and 1.55" exhaust valves
I will be installing a set of ported heads this spring (whenever the temperature reaches above freezing!!). I plan on taking a lot of pictures and doing a write-up. I'll let you guys know when it's up on the web and hopefully it will help a couple of you guys in the future
 
  #5  
Old 02-12-2004, 11:45 PM
duff man's Avatar
duff man
duff man is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: earth
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks alot for your replies! the info is great!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cmorningstar01
3.8 & 4.2L V6
8
06-14-2009 11:37 AM
lmd91343
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
05-05-2008 08:55 AM
NavyMIDN08
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
8
02-07-2007 03:08 PM
quadzjr
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
48
12-19-2005 01:20 PM
Show-N-Go LX
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
26
05-19-2004 08:37 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 4.2 performance



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.