Big 3 power
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region
Big 3 power
whats the specs for the TBI (4.3, 5.0, 5.7) and vortech (4.3, 5.0, 5.7) chebys and dodges (3.9, 5.2, 5.9) of the same era and how they compare to the Pre-97 effies?..
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
I don't know the exact specs from those engines, but chevy was most always in the lead with HP up until the last couple of years. It seems that they may have to go back to the drawing board with their v8's. I think they have about maxed out thier v8's, while still keeping them reliable.
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: IN
Originally posted by wnorman1192
I don't know the exact specs from those engines, but chevy was most always in the lead with HP up until the last couple of years. It seems that they may have to go back to the drawing board with their v8's. I think they have about maxed out thier v8's, while still keeping them reliable.
I don't know the exact specs from those engines, but chevy was most always in the lead with HP up until the last couple of years. It seems that they may have to go back to the drawing board with their v8's. I think they have about maxed out thier v8's, while still keeping them reliable.
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1
From: Alvin, Texas.
Re: Big 3 power
Originally posted by optikal illushun
whats the specs for the TBI (4.3, 5.0, 5.7) and vortech (4.3, 5.0, 5.7) chebys and dodges (3.9, 5.2, 5.9) of the same era and how they compare to the Pre-97 effies?..
whats the specs for the TBI (4.3, 5.0, 5.7) and vortech (4.3, 5.0, 5.7) chebys and dodges (3.9, 5.2, 5.9) of the same era and how they compare to the Pre-97 effies?..
TBI's
4.3 = 165/225
5.0 = 175/275
5.7 = 200/310
SPFI/Vortec
4.3 = 200/260
5.0 = 220/280
5.7 = 255/330
Close estimates, probably off on the lousy TBI engines.
Dodge:
3.9 = 175/230
5.2 = 220/300
5.9 = 245/360
F-trucks
4.9 = 160/275
5.0 = 185/280
5.8 = 210/325
It's Sunday, but I'm not too far off.....
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
TBI engines are not lousy. They are much better than the Vortecs. They can pull trailers as well as Vortecs and they are more fuel efficient. They are also more simple and reliable.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
|
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region
simple, yes..relible...maybe. they are down on power and the 305 version wasnt so hot from what i seen...
alfredB, u are a life saver, thanx! im gLad someone finally answered my post
alfredB, u are a life saver, thanx! im gLad someone finally answered my post
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies
Joe Kucinski
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
I was talking about 350's in particular. The Vortec might be rated higher, but has no noticable increase in power and a definite decrease in gas mileage. Believe me, I know. My dad owns a GM pickup with each engine. I don't know if you have been around Chevys much, but most people who are actually prefer the old TBI system.
Last edited by MJD; Feb 9, 2004 at 05:37 PM.
Post Fiend
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 5
From: Running Springs CA
The TBI 4.3 was called Vortec due to the head design. Torque was 235, not 225, at least for the '94 that I owned. Oil consumption was a little high on that engine but I had no other problems. TBI had a clean, simple look under the hood.
The main reason I bought that Chevy was the Ford 4.9 I test drove was gutless by comparison. Both were 2wd automatic regular cab half tons.
Jim
The main reason I bought that Chevy was the Ford 4.9 I test drove was gutless by comparison. Both were 2wd automatic regular cab half tons.
Jim