When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Originally posted by scroob And please don't call it a 400M. There is no such motor. The M designation is for the 351M only.
Put a Crane 268H cam in that 400 and I bet it would come close to the 460.
Who cares about the M designation they are the same motor
just different crank and pistons everything else is identical
some people call them 400 cleavelands wich is not rite
Thanks guys for al of the comments and suggestions. I think I will remove #1 intake and exhaust rockers and measure the travel. If I use an old pushrod I can put score marks on it for high and low then remove it and get a good measurement using the calipers. This way I won't have to worry about the rocker ratio or hydrolic lifter collapsing and I will have the proper geometry.
OK, I know better than to put a "M" after 400. What was I thinking? Must have been too much exhaust
The most accurate way would be to use a dial indicator over the rocker tip. Then divide by 1.73. You wouldn't have to disassemble anything to do this. If you want to take off a rocker arm you could measure the lobe directly using a pushrod and a dial indicator. You could even throw a degree wheel on it and see what the duration of the cam is.
BTW, cranking 110 or so compression tells me it is likely a fresh stock 460 or the static CR has been bumped up a little. Like was said before you can't tell for sure, especially if the cam has been changed but that would be my guess. It is almost certainly not 10:1 or more though. That would likely give you around 160 or so cranking compression, again, depending on the cam.
I was able to remove the rockers on #1 and use a dial on the pushrod. I kept the geometry as in line as I could. My readings were .235 intake and .255 exhaust. My book says the stock lifts are .253 & .278 so I think I'll just go with a cam kit. Thanks for the help guys. It's kind of a pain to reverse engineer a motor you know very little about but I figure it will help with my future build plans.