When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Unfortunately, there's nothing there for our older F-150s.
It appears to "over collapse," which got me thinking about how '91 and older have solid frames, and '92 and newer have crumple zones built in (I also wonder if this is why '92+ frames are a little bit thicker?).
I haven't seen any crash pictures to confirm either way, but I am wondering if the solid frame of '91 and older could be safer, as far as survival space goes. Does anyone have any thoughts and/or experience on that?
I don’t plan to crash my truck so I've never thought about it. How would a frame without the crumple zone have been “safer?” If so the manufacturer would not have added that zone. Modern vehicles are designed to crush up to the passenger compartment to absorb the impact.
I believe the big fuss over those 10G SuperCabs was that all you had for crash support was two doors butting up to each other. The offset test puts all the force on one side. Voila.
I don’t recall regular cabs or SCrews having those issues. Well, the videos just saw of a SCrew fared much better.
In any event, I’d put my money on newer trucks being better off. Maybe not as drastic as that ‘59 Impala vs ‘09 Impala video we’ve all seen, but you get the drift.
Last edited by Johnny Paycheck; Nov 27, 2025 at 04:50 PM.
Speed does not kill, stopping does. A slow stop vs a sudden stop is better and I would want a crush zone.
But then again, I am not planing on crashing and with a 5th wheel behind me, I'm really not worried about any crumple zone. I just want it to be quick. Why would I want to survive anything with a 10k trailer behind me?
Last edited by 1Butcher; Nov 28, 2025 at 08:58 AM.
I don’t plan to crash my truck so I've never thought about it. How would a frame without the crumple zone have been “safer?” If so the manufacturer would not have added that zone. Modern vehicles are designed to crush up to the passenger compartment to absorb the impact.
I am not saying that crumple zones don't make the impact itself safer, but that in some instances the crumple zone may be excessive and allow for too great of a reduction in survival space.
I agree that if executed correctly, in many situations crumple zones will be better.
Originally Posted by Johnny Paycheck
I believe the big fuss over those 10G SuperCabs was that all you had for crash support was two doors butting up to each other. The offset test puts all the force on one side. Voila.
I don’t recall regular cabs or SCrews having those issues. Well, the videos just saw of a SCrew fared much better.
In any event, I’d put my money on newer trucks being better off. Maybe not as drastic as that ‘59 Impala vs ‘09 Impala video we’ve all seen, but you get the drift.
Oh, wow! I didn't realize it was a super cab thing. I wonder if Dodge and Toyota had similar issues? Seems like it's important to give the doors something fixed to hold structure with.
Originally Posted by JJF20
They fixed the 150, but not the 250/350. I was always a little concerned in my ‘04 SD super cab. No crumple zones on the SD’s either.
...
It’s that sudden to zero stop that does a lot of internal damage. Crumple zones work.
One thing according to the above videos, your a lot safer in your truck than an escort or focus.
Thank you for the videos! Indeed, if crashing head on with a smaller vehicle, you do pretty well. Bit of an arms race with vehicles. Now crashing into a fixed barrier might be another story.
I work on Autoliv vehicles and have been watching crash videos for about 40 years
*Airbags work and crumple zones work
They really should crash cars and trucks into cars and trucks, not cars and trucks into walls
I am not saying that crumple zones don't make the impact itself safer, but that in some instances the crumple zone may be excessive and allow for too great of a reduction in survival space.
I get it's your opinion but if you had a solid frame that did not crumple, your organs would be so far damaged without that crush, you would be dead anyway. Sure, you would look good on the outside, but that is about it. Both result in death. Some people think not having seat belts on and they can tell stories that prove they are right. There has been people that have died because of air bags. If you want to take those stories to form an opinion, have at it. That sounds foolish to me.
Either way, we all should understand that life ends with death and how fast we get there is a lot of times is based on our decisions. If you want crumple zones, airbags, seat belts, no crumple zones.... have at it. Crashing is not something I look at when I buy a truck. Can it tow my trailer? Do I want to work on it? Those are probably the two main reasons I chose my truck.
Why do you think I stay out of Seattle! The last time I looked, Lime Bikes, Scooters, and bicycles don't have crumple zones. Many of those riders have no common sense either.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.