Notices
2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

E85 flex fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
E85 flex fuel

2017 with 80k that has never burned E85.

Would you start burning it or wouldn't you and why.

My gut says just keep using standard fuel.
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 08:53 PM
  #2  
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,434
Likes: 708
From: Calgary Canada
Should have more "solvent" properties, so might clean things out. Is it much cheaper where you live?
 
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2025 | 10:52 PM
  #3  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
Should have more "solvent" properties, so might clean things out. Is it much cheaper where you live?
about 50 cents cheaper. 2.75 or so.
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2025 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
npccpartsman's Avatar
npccpartsman
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 15,365
Likes: 120
From: Stuttgart, Ar
Club FTE Silver Member

More corrosive is probably more like it. Regardless, the fuel systems are supposed to withstand it and designed to run on it if need be.

It's cheaper but you will probably get less mpg's. You'll just have to do the math and see. I know the hot rod guys love it because you can make some insane HP with it if you've got the right stuff.
 
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2025 | 02:18 PM
  #5  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by npccpartsman
More corrosive is probably more like it. Regardless, the fuel systems are supposed to withstand it and designed to run on it if need be.

It's cheaper but you will probably get less mpg's. You'll just have to do the math and see. I know the hot rod guys love it because you can make some insane HP with it if you've got the right stuff.
yeah that is exactly what I was thinking.

I'm not concerned about fuel costs. I have always been fortunate that gas has always been a relatively small fraction of lifes expenses.

I was more curious what the ecm would do once it detected a high ethanol content since it has never seen it in 80k miles.

I am most likely never to use it UNLESS I happen to get a Whipple...........
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2025 | 07:01 AM
  #6  
npccpartsman's Avatar
npccpartsman
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 15,365
Likes: 120
From: Stuttgart, Ar
Club FTE Silver Member

Procharger is a better option IMHO, but that's another story.

AFA the fuel type goes, there is a Flex Fuel Sensor that, according to the tuning tables in the PCM, adjusts the engine to run on a certain range of ethanol. If you've ever seen a show called Engine Masters, they do a whole show just on the "Magic of the Flex Fuel Sensor" season 7 episode 21. Pretty educational.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2025 | 08:50 AM
  #7  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by npccpartsman
Procharger is a better option IMHO, but that's another story.

AFA the fuel type goes, there is a Flex Fuel Sensor that, according to the tuning tables in the PCM, adjusts the engine to run on a certain range of ethanol. If you've ever seen a show called Engine Masters, they do a whole show just on the "Magic of the Flex Fuel Sensor" season 7 episode 21. Pretty educational.
probably a little easier to install. Not sure about the tuning aspect compared to the Ford Whipple option.

I do watch that show but missed that episode. Thanks for the info. I'll see if I can watch it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2025 | 03:49 PM
  #8  
PupnDuck's Avatar
PupnDuck
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 102
From: Staten Island, NY
Yep, the alcohol in E85 is a solvent. Not to mention the co-solvents added to the fuel to keep it from separating.
Do you really want to "clean out" 85K worth of gunk and flush it through your injectors?
 
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2025 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by PupnDuck
Yep, the alcohol in E85 is a solvent. Not to mention the co-solvents added to the fuel to keep it from separating.
Do you really want to "clean out" 85K worth of gunk and flush it through your injectors?
nope. That is why I'm asking opinions.
I also wonder how common it is to have a flex fuel vehicle that the original owner never used that fuel.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2025 | 10:17 AM
  #10  
scott91370's Avatar
scott91370
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 133
From: Burleson, Tx
Unless it is 25-30% less expensive that what you're currently running you will not save any money because you will use 25-30% more of it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2025 | 05:53 PM
  #11  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by scott91370
Unless it is 25-30% less expensive that what you're currently running you will not save any money because you will use 25-30% more of it.
not looking to save money. Asking opinions on an 8 year old truck with 80k that has never drank e85 in its life. Is it even worth trying it to just simply try it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2025 | 08:37 PM
  #12  
PupnDuck's Avatar
PupnDuck
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 102
From: Staten Island, NY
Originally Posted by 2017coyote
not looking to save money. Asking opinions on an 8 year old truck with 80k that has never drank e85 in its life. Is it even worth trying it to just simply try it.
OK Here's my opinion. There's just no up-side to this idea. At the best you'll have a vehicle that runs pretty much the same but gets 20% less fuel mileage. Or, you'll end up having to dump a bunch of $$$ into it to fix stuff that previously didn't need fixing.

It's a lose-lose situation.
 
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2025 | 10:46 PM
  #13  
Picky1962's Avatar
Picky1962
5th Wheeling
5 Year Member
Liked
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 41
Likes: 5
From: Olathe, Kansas
I've got a 2017 with 80,000 miles that I bought last year. I definitely got worse gas mileage and figured that E85 had to be about $.60 a gallon cheaper than normal unleaded to make a worthwhile. Manual says you need to run your tank low before switching grades of gasoline and that became a pain.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2025 | 05:34 AM
  #14  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by PupnDuck
OK Here's my opinion. There's just no up-side to this idea. At the best you'll have a vehicle that runs pretty much the same but gets 20% less fuel mileage. Or, you'll end up having to dump a bunch of $$$ into it to fix stuff that previously didn't need fixing.

It's a lose-lose situation.
seems to be the consensus and what im thinking also. Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2025 | 05:37 AM
  #15  
2017coyote's Avatar
2017coyote
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2025
Posts: 72
Likes: 41
Originally Posted by Picky1962
I've got a 2017 with 80,000 miles that I bought last year. I definitely got worse gas mileage and figured that E85 had to be about $.60 a gallon cheaper than normal unleaded to make a worthwhile. Manual says you need to run your tank low before switching grades of gasoline and that became a pain.
yeah I read that also along with switching back to regular fuel occasionally or something of the sort.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.