Notices
2022+ F-150 Lightning EV Electric 1/2-ton - Ford's all-electric F-150 has arrived!

2025 Lightning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2024 | 07:30 PM
  #31  
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger
Fleet Owner
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26,000
Likes: 4,144
From: Near Cal. Avenue
It's easy to laugh at $60,000 PER for fleet buyers and most likely add another $10,000 for a contract of 100 vehicles per.
Sure Industry standards have to be harsher due to difficult usages, daily over us daily drivers.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2024 | 10:57 PM
  #32  
Flyct's Avatar
Flyct
FTE Community Team
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,335
Likes: 1,042
From: Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by twobelugas
I thought we were talking about EVs and not hybrids?.
I wsa just responding to your post where you brought up Hybrids

Originally Posted by twobelugas
Simple: if what you claimed was the case for F250s and up trucks, there should be viable hybrid or ev options for class 2B and up trucks by now.

 
Reply
Old May 5, 2024 | 11:08 PM
  #33  
Flyct's Avatar
Flyct
FTE Community Team
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,335
Likes: 1,042
From: Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

Duplicate posting deleted

 

Last edited by Flyct; May 5, 2024 at 11:09 PM. Reason: Duplicate
Reply
Old May 6, 2024 | 10:44 AM
  #34  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,558
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by Flyct
I wsa just responding to your post where you brought up Hybrids

Originally Posted by twobelugas
Simple: if what you claimed was the case for F250s and up trucks, there should be viable hybrid or ev options for class 2B and up trucks by now.
From what I'm hearing the F150 Power Boost hybrid makes worse fuel economy than an equivalent 3.5 EB powered truck when towing. If this is truly a fact, not sure how a hybrid technology would work in a Super Duty that tow's a lot. Again want to stress this may or maynot be accurate.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2024 | 10:58 AM
  #35  
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,558
From: The Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by twobelugas
Simple: if what you claimed was the case for F250s and up trucks, there should be viable hybrid or ev options for class 2B and up trucks by now.

Companies like Magna have been at it trying to electrify for decades, and fleet operators are notoriously cost conscious so I doubt they would stand in the way if there is truly a business case already.

A functional kinetic energy capturing set up for 3/4+ ton trucks would be HUGE if it is doable. Years ago Magna created a lot of buzz with these

https://www.magna.com/company/newsro...eam-technology

https://electrek.co/2022/05/12/we-go...nas-tech-week/

Yet nevertheless, here we are.
I remember seeing TFL Truck review a GM HD truck equipped with this unit and really like the concept, but been crickets since then.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2024 | 01:10 PM
  #36  
twobelugas's Avatar
twobelugas
Logistics Pro
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 2,245
Originally Posted by FishOnOne
I remember seeing TFL Truck review a GM HD truck equipped with this unit and really like the concept, but been crickets since then.
Yes, it has been crickets. It's not hard to imagine why, anything is possible in a small batch and enough subsidy from the government, but once they try to scale production and stand on its own merit. they probably ran into a combination of issues involving cost, durability, and performance of the set up.

What people don't always remember is that the motors EVs use are all very susceptible to heat damage when operated outside of their design parameters. The prevalence of single speed gearboxes means at the low end the electric motors are always being, for the lack of better word, "lugged". That is okay if the weight of the vehicle stays relatively stable between empty and loaded, but once you expect a motor to propel a vehicle whose weight can fluctuate between say 7000 lbs and 37000 lbs, you are gonna have problems. I think eventually they will need to implement a multi speed gear box set up to make heavy towing and hauling feasible, otherwise they have to use a motor-battery set up to accomodate the heaviest possible GCWR which would then make the truck exceedingly expensive, as well as unwieldy when not fully loaded to drive and live with.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2024 | 01:49 PM
  #37  
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger
Fleet Owner
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26,000
Likes: 4,144
From: Near Cal. Avenue
Originally Posted by twobelugas
Yes, it has been crickets. It's not hard to imagine why, anything is possible in a small batch and enough subsidy from the government, but once they try to scale production and stand on its own merit. they probably ran into a combination of issues involving cost, durability, and performance of the set up.

What people don't always remember is that the motors EVs use are all very susceptible to heat damage when operated outside of their design parameters. The prevalence of single speed gearboxes means at the low end the electric motors are always being, for the lack of better word, "lugged". That is okay if the weight of the vehicle stays relatively stable between empty and loaded, but once you expect a motor to propel a vehicle whose weight can fluctuate between say 7000 lbs and 37000 lbs, you are gonna have problems. I think eventually they will need to implement a multi speed gear box set up to make heavy towing and hauling feasible, otherwise they have to use a motor-battery set up to accomodate the heaviest possible GCWR which would then make the truck exceedingly expensive, as well as unwieldy when not fully loaded to drive and live with.
I'm not sure but I don't believe these motors can sustain field shunting for higher speeds / 2 speeds. It would seem a motor for each wheel would be the power supply solution most likely. All motors get direct access to full current flow capabilities. Controlling each motors torque thru the current flow control Modules...& the Control Circuit boards. Your accelerator position asks for power and the Control Boards respond. Obviously, Cowboy kicking would be sort of stupid way to ruin stuff early. But you know the advertisement show how the torque is so great by towing extremely heavy loads and running the 1/4 mile is just seconds. Sure, it's the totally wrong way to teach EV drivers to have great outcomes. The operational end it all is for the load to push the vehicle downhill thus Regen occurs, basically controlled by power diodes. Need controlled power up hill, level and gain power downhill, slowing for curves, stoplights that sort of stuff. Basically its a different animal from what the current Regen Generation-Populatin is trained for.

Most likely purchasing the right size of motors / power supplies / Power control systems is paramount to good outcomes. 1/4 quarter Horsepower, ain't going to pull a Big Horse far.

I'm pretty sure these systems have heat sensor technology to cut the power supplies if overheating is near. The driver most likely gets a warning to slow or pullover soon. You know
overloading would cause a voltage drop and current heat increasing blinking light most likely. I had a career with power control devices in Material Handling equipment but see no
way that the EV can fill my long mileage needs for now. That being said I would fully welcome them when they will meet my range needs if ever that happens.. 450 - 500 miles to charge.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2024 | 02:15 PM
  #38  
twobelugas's Avatar
twobelugas
Logistics Pro
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 3,866
Likes: 2,245
Originally Posted by Papa Tiger
I'm not sure but I don't believe these motors can sustain field shunting for higher speeds / 2 speeds. It would seem a motor for each wheel would be the power supply solution most likely. All motors get direct access to full current flow capabilities. Controlling each motors torque thru the current flow control Modules...& the Control Circuit boards. Your accelerator position asks for power and the Control Boards respond. Obviously, Cowboy kicking would be sort of stupid way to ruin stuff early. But you know the advertisement show how the torque is so great by towing extremely heavy loads and running the 1/4 mile is just seconds. Sure, it's the totally wrong way to teach EV drivers to have great outcomes. The operational end it all is for the load to push the vehicle downhill thus Regen occurs, basically controlled by power diodes. Need controlled power up hill, level and gain power downhill, slowing for curves, stoplights that sort of stuff. Basically its a different animal from what the current Regen Generation-Populatin is trained for.

Most likely purchasing the right size of motors / power supplies / Power control systems is paramount to good outcomes. 1/4 quarter Horsepower, ain't going to pull a Big Horse far.

I'm pretty sure these systems have heat sensor technology to cut the power supplies if overheating is near. The driver most likely gets a warning to slow or pullover soon. You know
overloading would cause a voltage drop and current heat increasing blinking light most likely. I had a career with power control devices in Material Handling equipment but see no
way that the EV can fill my long mileage needs for now. That being said I would fully welcome them when they will meet my range needs if ever that happens.. 450 - 500 miles to charge.
Like I said before, if it was viable, we would see multiple offerings by now. Until then, it's all just tax payer funded experiments.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2024 | 05:39 PM
  #39  
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger
Fleet Owner
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26,000
Likes: 4,144
From: Near Cal. Avenue
Originally Posted by twobelugas
Like I said before, if it was viable, we would see multiple offerings by now. Until then, it's all just tax payer funded experiments.
It may end up sort of like the Wrong brothers building the first flier.
Some Crashing is paramount to advancing the stuff most likely.
Then the Wright Bros. will make the leap of faith to sort of success.
I yet to see Elon's Pickup on the Expressways here with millions of people
and 100'000's of vehicles. Beat em to the punch sometimes have lessons to learn.

To put all of what I have said into a realistic setting my 390 66 GTA 390 Holley got a set 170 - 200 miles and you better be setting in a gas station or very close.
My 454 Bow Tie pickup with dual Tanks, 10 MPG, you better be setting in a gas station at 390 miles. But they were daily 40 mile drivers.
 
Reply
Old May 8, 2024 | 05:01 PM
  #40  
Flyct's Avatar
Flyct
FTE Community Team
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,335
Likes: 1,042
From: Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Papa Tiger
It may end up sort of like the Wrong brothers building the first flier.
Some Crashing is paramount to advancing the stuff most likely.
Then the Wright Bros. will make the leap of faith to sort of success.
I yet to see Elon's Pickup on the Expressways here with millions of people
and 100'000's of vehicles. Beat em to the punch sometimes have lessons to learn.
Did you really just insult the Wright Brothers by calling them the Wrong Brothers? I vote to ban you from ever flying on an airplane 👩‍✈️

 
Reply
Old May 9, 2024 | 11:20 AM
  #41  
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger
Fleet Owner
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26,000
Likes: 4,144
From: Near Cal. Avenue
Originally Posted by Flyct
Did you really just insult the Wright Brothers by calling them the Wrong Brothers? I vote to ban you from ever flying on an airplane 👩‍✈️

https://youtu.be/1rJ3Ga75OXE?si=fQdJNngd1FjJVUnp
The Wright's did make the Catapult so they could fly anytime anywhere.
Never hear much about their bicycles though.
Ya know the last time I flew it was in a private plane $ very rough.
Felt like an apple in one mt bucket on a bicycle handles bar.
 
Reply
Old May 9, 2024 | 12:01 PM
  #42  
Flyct's Avatar
Flyct
FTE Community Team
Veteran: Air Force
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 3,335
Likes: 1,042
From: Florida
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Papa Tiger
The Wright's did make the Catapult so they could fly anytime anywhere.
Never hear much about their bicycles though.
Ya know the last time I flew it was in a private plane $ very rough.
Felt like an apple in one mt bucket on a bicycle handles bar.
I’ve got 3,000 hours and wife has 2,000 hours as pilot in command. This was taken be me in our last plane, tooling along at 180 mph. I’m in right seat and wife is pilot this trip. Only way to fly.







 
Reply
Old May 17, 2024 | 10:15 PM
  #43  
Papa Tiger's Avatar
Papa Tiger
Fleet Owner
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 26,000
Likes: 4,144
From: Near Cal. Avenue
I'm thinking that adding a gas generator into the bed of the Lightening extends its usable light load range significantly. Most likely a Charger Module to twin stack with the trucks would work well.
Put a Chain Hoist in the garage to lift it in and out of the Box as needed. Sort of like the Generator with RVs for campers or like the plug in at Hurricane weather homes.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dean Bitner
Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
0
Nov 25, 2015 08:38 PM
1986F150six
WTB - Parts & other
0
Sep 20, 2013 06:46 AM
black 95
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
Apr 9, 2006 06:33 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.