When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That's the code for 3.08:1 gears, open differential.
I wouldn't go bigger than 31" unless willing to regear. Good 31" tires and some tire chains on standby in the bed would be a good approach in my opinion.
If you want bigger tires and significantly more capability, regear to 4.10:1 and run 33" tires. During the regear, stuff an Eaton Trutrac rear differential in there. Night and day difference in capability of the truck. Note the front regear is dead simple: go to junkyard, and get a D50 ttb third from a truck with 4.10 gears. Your existing axle shafts will work, along with existing drive shaft. Install Moog cc824 front coil springs, and get an alignment. You'll hardly recognize the truck! Of course, that's much more work, may be out of the question.
I have that gearset in the 92, but I kept the stock size 235/75R15s. I bet it would be a slug as it is an extended cab too.
Kept my old 3.55:1 from the '88 which I am going to pop in it. Should wake it up quite a bit.
if I had a long enoughvehicle and money to burn Id defintiely go 4.10 or more and combine an afttermarket OD Or auxillary trans etc some kind to allow the good utilization through the start to the cruise to the traction to the this etcetc. Or if they werent so rare and not commonly a thing so less helpful an idea,
If 2 speed rear ends were all the rage.being able to shift on the fly the rear ratio would be cool
Thgis is not a direct comparison but see these BFs on this GMC. the squared shoulder and the white letering ultimately make the tire more pronounced, but its not technically even as tall as it was OE! Thiks wheel is not turned forward so its a little less obvious.. but that tire "fuller" if you go by size. but its narrow and its got tread that retreat more than on the BFs
I don't want to change anything except the tires. So if I leave everything the way it is what's the biggest I can go without causing problems?
Your question was answered…
Originally Posted by Hit Man X
With the lowly 3.08:1 gear set, I would not go to 31s.
Originally Posted by GoinBoarding
I wouldn't go bigger than 31" unless willing to regear.
Your current metric tire is 29” so going to a 31” tire effectively reduces your rear axle ratio to a 2.88 gear. If your thought the truck was a dog starting from stopped it will be worse.
I had 3.55 gears and kept the 235/75 tires but went with a LT (light truck) tire instead of the P (passenger) rating.
Unfortunately you have one of the least desirable combinations known to mankind. Why in the world Ford offered 3.08 gears in any truck is beyond comprehension.
Even stock height tires are a strain let alone anything taller. Your quest for taller tires is going to result in even less performance or a significantly thinner wallet sorry to say.
Unfortunately you have one of the least desirable combinations known to mankind. Why in the world Ford offered 3.08 gears in any truck is beyond comprehension.
Even stock height tires are a strain let alone anything taller. Your quest for taller tires is going to result in even less performance or a significantly thinner wallet sorry to say.
why do you say thinner wallet? Like the milage will be worse?
I imagine the truck is slow being a 4.9L to begin with. Do you tow or haul much with the truck? If it's just a tooling around rig you use to go fish, I wouldn't worry about a being a little slower yet. But if it's your daily driver, needs to keep up in traffic, city driving, tow rig etc. May be better served with staying with the 29" tire.
There aren't any options to go 31" tall but narrower than 10.5", as far as I'm aware. Narrower is typically lighter, which I've read helps. But it has no impact on effective final drive ratio.
I would like something good in the snow. Do lots of ice fishing. That's why I want more height for the deep snow.
If it were me, I'd be looking at a good set of narrow dedicated snow tires. If you're running ice or lakes, I'd also look into a set that are studable. Imho, I wouldn't worry about the height - an extra inch is an extra inch. But the extra 1" you're going to gain isn't going to amount to much more clearance anyway.
If it were me, I'd be looking at a good set of narrow dedicated snow tires. If you're running ice or lakes, I'd also look into a set that are studable. Imho, I wouldn't worry about the height - an extra inch is an extra inch. But the extra 1" you're going to gain isn't going to amount to much more clearance anyway.
I think you may find a tire easier (if issues looking) by using the old ... 7.80-15 ???? I cant think off my head what the right size would be, but if you search tires sold under that sizing you may have luck finding a good narrow. But it may be a throw-bac k legacy tire too...
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.