Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Smog Fail Twice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2022 | 05:56 PM
  #16  
james_1988f250's Avatar
james_1988f250
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 256
Likes: 30
From: San Jose, CA
Exclamation 3rd test failed again - but different

Still failed on 3rd test. This time got best results out of all 3 tests for HC at 25 mph but still failed at 15mph. Strange. Also this time, NO levels at both speeds were above the MAX allowed. Which I saw a progression in that through each test. CO lowest out of all 3 at 25mph and still passed both speeds. Did I make it too lean now? I need to figure out wth to do about this because I can't afford to take it to a shop. Automotive work goes for 150 an hour here. I attached the results below for comparison and reference. Obviously need to get it to how it was at the first test because I passed emissions there they just failed me cuz I made my own timing mark smh.





3rd test
​​​​​​​
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2022 | 06:19 PM
  #17  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,491
Likes: 2,806
Club FTE Gold Member
Too lean will give you high NO.
https://www.smogtips.com/failed-high...xygen%20Sensor.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 06:06 AM
  #18  
craftsmangary's Avatar
craftsmangary
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Likes: 58
From: Michigan
What is your STFT and LTFT? You need a scanner and it's in the data stream
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 10:19 AM
  #19  
james_1988f250's Avatar
james_1988f250
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 256
Likes: 30
From: San Jose, CA
@craftsmangary this is pre OBDII. The only Ford scanner i can find just looks at codes.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 11:41 AM
  #20  
craftsmangary's Avatar
craftsmangary
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Likes: 58
From: Michigan
I can 100% guarantee you has fuel trim, the O2's job is to trim the fuel. Cheap code readers probably won't give you the data. Without looking at that stuff you may as well roll the diagnostic dice because you have no idea of what's really going on.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 12:02 PM
  #21  
james_1988f250's Avatar
james_1988f250
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 256
Likes: 30
From: San Jose, CA
@craftsmangary So, do I need a new O2 sensor. You're saying im having lack of fuel trim or too much fuel trim. And is the source of the problem likely from the O2 sensor? The only data I will get is from smog checks which I already have 3 of.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 01:23 PM
  #22  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,491
Likes: 2,806
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by james_1988f250
@craftsmangary this is pre OBDII. The only Ford scanner i can find just looks at codes.
But if you had those codes it might open up a new line of thought on the problem.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 02:36 PM
  #23  
craftsmangary's Avatar
craftsmangary
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Likes: 58
From: Michigan
In order for you to fix this you need to understand fuel trim and have a SCANNER because you need to see the numbers, a code reader isn't going to get you anywhere. Because you have a P0172 I already know your fuel trim is out. Go to youtube and watch some video's on understanding fuel trim, STFT and LTFT. If you figure why the fuel trim is out and fix it that'll probably clean up the exhaust and you'll pass.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 03:39 PM
  #24  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,786
Likes: 1,751
From: Kentucky
I do not believe the OP stated they have any error codes. A 1988 model year F-Series truck does not a have computer that can output live data via the test port or a J3 port to view real time data with a tuner/laptop. Please correct me if I am wrong.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2022 | 08:39 PM
  #25  
james_1988f250's Avatar
james_1988f250
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 256
Likes: 30
From: San Jose, CA
Correct. The only thing you can pull off of the computer is diagnostics for Check Engine Codes. This is PRE-OBDII. First year with EFI and electronic engine control with the Ford PCM.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2022 | 07:57 AM
  #26  
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 20,786
Likes: 1,751
From: Kentucky
Ford started using live data output around 1990. It is possible to view live data on OBD-I vehicles if the system supports it. Unfortunately that is not the case for a 1988 model year.

Actron scanner screen 1


Screen 2


snagged from this thread: ODB-1 Scan Tool! - FINALLY!!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2022 | 08:17 AM
  #27  
AuroraGirl's Avatar
AuroraGirl
Lead Driver
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 805
Plus the live data on a 1990 is probably not that fast updating or many values.

I know on gm vehicles the data you could read live while engine is running was limited to certain ones and certain tests would force the pcm to run a certain way, so it had to be under certain circumstances and the data updated slowly. An air fuel ratio meter may be wise? But there is some thing for sure that can be done, if the O2 isnt new its probably due (face it, even if it ran perfect its been 32 years since it was new) and a heated one may be wise. make sure if it grounds on exhaust the exhaust is grounded well. make sure the exhaust doesnt leak before the o2.

Make sure there are no vacuum leaks. The MAP sensor(should be testable with a volt meter I think?) should have a good source that is not collapsable and no leaks. the ECM ground should be clean and the grounding of the engine, frame, fenders etc should all be in order. The TPS should be checked for adjustment, if its not Recent, they do wear on the wiper I believe, so a new one which is also adjusted to spec is maybe wise. clean the IAC. make sure the EGR is operated in spec. make sure TB is not vacuum leak prone like with a propane torch unlit.

If this all will cost too much money, bribery and corruption is older than cars themselves and it just takes connections. Dark web may have some classifieds for this. (joking but not really)
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2022 | 08:30 AM
  #28  
AuroraGirl's Avatar
AuroraGirl
Lead Driver
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 805
Originally Posted by james_1988f250
Still failed on 3rd test. This time got best results out of all 3 tests for HC at 25 mph but still failed at 15mph. Strange. Also this time, NO levels at both speeds were above the MAX allowed. Which I saw a progression in that through each test. CO lowest out of all 3 at 25mph and still passed both speeds. Did I make it too lean now? I need to figure out wth to do about this because I can't afford to take it to a shop. Automotive work goes for 150 an hour here. I attached the results below for comparison and reference. Obviously need to get it to how it was at the first test because I passed emissions there they just failed me cuz I made my own timing mark smh.





3rd test
Also, is your cat converter in good order? I dont know much about an emissions test itself but if your cat was borderline or worn out I could see the NOX part making sense.
also it sounds like snake oil but GM had issues getting TBI 305 and 350 engines in the late 80s and 90s passing smog and they had a few tips
1) Run engine at higher idle while waiting for test
2) use gm top end engine cleaner(Expesnvie but you can use something like seafoams intake thing you let it soak and then continue cleaning carbon out the top end)
3) confirm engine ignition is up to snuff and plugs are in good condition/right gap. any spark lost to a carbon track or crossfire or poor connection is spark that cant complete the combustion event properly. also means verifying your wires with some water spray maybe a good idea. also if you have a distributor mounted module, you may be have one thats having heated related issues ?
4) make sure the AIR system is working as designed (more air to the cat means more temp means more efficient operation)

If you want to watch their tips:
Gives some overall good engine tips, regardless of this being buick roadmaster its applicable to engines overall

I feel bad youre having to be at the mercy of a california for a pre obd2 era vehicle that also itself is going to be generally harder to keep in compliance over time .(I suspect a 4 cylinder taurus would not deviate as far as a 7.5l v8 over time)
Also you didnt read this here but if you can dodge taxes in this country then you probably can dodge other things with enough digging :O

Allegedly. Joking of course.

Joking
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2022 | 09:23 AM
  #29  
craftsmangary's Avatar
craftsmangary
More Turbo
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 580
Likes: 58
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by rla2005
Ford started using live data output around 1990. It is possible to view live data on OBD-I vehicles if the system supports it. Unfortunately that is not the case for a 1988 model year.

Actron scanner screen 1


Screen 2


snagged from this thread: ODB-1 Scan Tool! - FINALLY!!!
So in that data stream the STFT is -5%, the O2 is .47 and it's in closed loop, this looks like a good running engine. In a good running engine the STFT should be switching + and - and hover around 0, the O2 range is .1 (lean) to ,9 (rich) with .450 in the middle, the O2 should be switching above and below .450, on OBD1 vehicles without a heated O2 they'll switch in and out of closed loop at an idle, when the engine is doing all of that it's usually running good.
If the O2 is stuck at .9 and the fuel trim is off then you know you have a problem.
The ECM is always trying to keep the AF ratio at 14.7-1 and it does that by controlling the fuel trim, it know what the AF ratio is from what the O2 is telling it what to do.
If the STFT is out of wack for a while the ECM take that amount and adds it to the LTFT and reset's the STFT back to 0, so total FT is STFT + LTFT

i have a shelf full with all my old scanners, I have the old Star tester, the old Snap On Brick, a Snap on Modis, an Autel, and a few more. I don't ever remember not being able to see the data for those old OBD1 systems, it's been years since since I've done anything from the 80's, last OBD1 I fixed was a 94 Ford and I was able to see everything I wanted to see.

Mitchell and ALLData do have sensor range charts for some vehicles, typically it's what the values should be at an idle on the data stream you're reading. Google may help you find one is you need it, it can be helpful.
 
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2022 | 11:54 AM
  #30  
james_1988f250's Avatar
james_1988f250
Thread Starter
|
Tuned
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 256
Likes: 30
From: San Jose, CA
@AuroraGirl Thank you for all the tips. I think I most likely have a vacuum issue and Im going to go through all my sensors and make sure they are all working. Also yes lol I found a guy that would just mark it off but he said it would cost 300 dollars.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE