Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

1949 F1 t5 swap crossmember

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2026 | 08:17 PM
  #16  
CJMOStang's Avatar
CJMOStang
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 98
Likes: 64
Originally Posted by Christopher2
What made you decide to use them? I bought my T5 adapter kit from Speedway, was going to get their 10.5” clutch and pressure plate.
I got my adapter from Cornhusker and he recommended them
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2026 | 11:25 PM
  #17  
rwilly1's Avatar
rwilly1
Mountain Pass
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 112
Likes: 6
This is what I used.

I got this from Speedway.


 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2026 | 09:39 AM
  #18  
CJMOStang's Avatar
CJMOStang
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 98
Likes: 64
I got the Speedway crossmember last night. Here are a few pictures. If I can get it to mount where it is in the pictures, I can leave my master cylinder booster.

Does anyone have their measurement from the old crossmember to the T5 mount.



 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2026 | 03:22 PM
  #19  
49willard's Avatar
49willard
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 165
From: Harpswell Maine
Strongly suggest doing a full mock up with engine/transmission.
 
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2026 | 03:50 PM
  #20  
Christopher2's Avatar
Christopher2
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 26
From: Minnesota
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by CJMOStang
I got the Speedway crossmember last night. Here are a few pictures. If I can get it to mount where it is in the pictures, I can leave my master cylinder booster.

Does anyone have their measurement from the old crossmember to the T5 mount.


Which master cylinder is that? What diameter is the booster, I’m seeing 7” or 8”, then single or dual diaphragm? Single or dual diaphragm? Our setups are going to be really close to the same.

I have been looking at one of these.


 

Last edited by Christopher2; Mar 26, 2026 at 04:40 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2026 | 05:01 AM
  #21  
fh4ever's Avatar
fh4ever
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 68
I agree with post #19. do a full mock-up to get the right height/distance from the crossmember and the proper engine tilt. I think you will find the stock crossmember will need some trimming.
I tried the stock 7" mustang II master cylinder /booster (if I recall) with the no-limit eng pedal mount. It was completely in the way of the new crossmember. I might can get a pic or two and a measurment later today if youstill want.
Christopher 2 (post #12), the chevy 10" disc is what you need and the stock pressure plate is re-used. Parts might be cheaper thru your local supplier? maybe?
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2026 | 06:57 AM
  #22  
Christopher2's Avatar
Christopher2
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 26
From: Minnesota
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fh4ever
I agree with post #19. do a full mock-up to get the right height/distance from the crossmember and the proper engine tilt. I think you will find the stock crossmember will need some trimming.
I tried the stock 7" mustang II master cylinder /booster (if I recall) with the no-limit eng pedal mount. It was completely in the way of the new crossmember. I might can get a pic or two and a measurment later today if youstill want.
Christopher 2 (post #12), the chevy 10" disc is what you need and the stock pressure plate is re-used. Parts might be cheaper thru your local supplier? maybe?
I would like to see pictures and what you ended up doing. I have found a lot of threads that don’t show installed and working setups. The person either never finished or didn’t share end results.

No Limit Options

This option from no limit looks interesting. The remote options takes up less space in the area and cleans it up a bit. The booster looks smaller also for some reason.




 

Last edited by Christopher2; Mar 28, 2026 at 07:35 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2026 | 09:54 AM
  #23  
CJMOStang's Avatar
CJMOStang
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 98
Likes: 64
I am planning on a full mock up this weekend. I will get pictures. I’ve got the T5 apart and waiting for a bearing kit so the empty shell will be a lot lighter.

I’m not sure of the size of the booster but I willmeasure while I’m under the truck today. It was a CPP kit several years ago.

Is it possible to leave the bottom rail of the old crossmember? I’m planning on cutting the ‘rudder’ off of the tail shaft if that helps any.
 

Last edited by CJMOStang; Mar 28, 2026 at 11:22 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2026 | 12:26 PM
  #24  
fh4ever's Avatar
fh4ever
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 68
here is the center of the original crosssmember cut out


The center flat piece stayed, but I added 1/4' plate on the front and rear plate. (note: the center flat piece was cut in the middle and pushed down enough to clear the tranny)


and the stock mastercylinder:


more pics


here is the no limit brake mount kit that I removed


hope these will help, let me know if you need more.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2026 | 02:14 PM
  #25  
Christopher2's Avatar
Christopher2
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 26
From: Minnesota
Club FTE Gold Member
That helps a lot and gives me a clearer picture of what I’m working with.

I definitely want to go with a dual master cylinder for safety—having a split system just makes sense so I’m not risking a total loss of brakes if something fails. I’m also planning to add front disc brakes, so I’m aiming for a setup that gives solid, reliable stopping power in modern traffic.

Trying to keep the factory-style floor pedal if possible, but space is tight with the T5 swap, so I’m weighing options that will fit without interference. Open to suggestions on what’s worked well for others in a similar setup.


May try and modify that center crossmember for transmission to be more of a “U” shape on the left to clear master cylinder.
 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2026 | 05:48 PM
  #26  
fh4ever's Avatar
fh4ever
Mountain Pass
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 167
Likes: 68
I thought the same thing when I was doing mine...(the "U" shape at the brake booster). Here is another thought...look at the possibility to run the stock master cylinder to power a remote booster? the remote booster can be mounted anywhere, and it can be dual circuit . I always had this in the back of my mind.


 
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2026 | 05:58 PM
  #27  
Christopher2's Avatar
Christopher2
Fleet Mechanic
Veteran: Navy
20 Year Member
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 26
From: Minnesota
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by fh4ever
I thought the same thing when I was doing mine...(the "U" shape at the brake booster). Here is another thought...look at the possibility to run the stock master cylinder to power a remote booster? the remote booster can be mounted anywhere, and it can be dual circuit . I always had this in the back of my mind.

With a single reservoir system, if a wheel cylinder leaks, it will drain the entire system. With a dual system front and rear are divided so you could lose one end but not both with a leak or hose break.
 
Reply
Old Yesterday | 01:46 PM
  #28  
M2HB's Avatar
M2HB
Fleet Mechanic
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
Joined: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 512
I do not have any experience with the F-1 trucks but I did make custom cross members for my 1955 F-100.

Any of these frames that have cantilevered cab mounts NEED a cross member in the original location to counteract the leverage of the cab mounts. Ford has the original cross members connected to the top and bottom flange of the frame and the web of the frame. This cross member does not have to be the original shape, but it does have to do what the original member did which is to counteract the leverage of the cab mounts.

I built a custom cross member to replace the original one and I built a second cross member to support the back of my 10R80 transmission.

The original cross member location on my truck was nowhere near close enough to work for any transmission I was considering. However, it was required for structural integrity.
 
Reply
Old Yesterday | 05:56 PM
  #29  
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,102
Likes: 138
From: Orcas Island Wa.
Club FTE Gold Member
If your original engine/trans is still in position, it's a good idea to take a measurement from a place on the firewall to a place on your block or head so you can end up with your engine's rear at the same height as stock. Some fudging is ok , but things can bind up under certain conditions. Things like throttle linkage!!!!! Yikes.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ajatruck
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
Oct 19, 2022 11:36 AM
740buckeye
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Jul 5, 2018 05:53 PM
kens65fb
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Sep 2, 2016 08:34 AM
48 Steel
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
Nov 9, 2006 05:11 PM
41Clay
1947 and Older Ford Trucks
1
Nov 3, 2002 10:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.