P-Rated Tires on Superduty
#1
P-Rated Tires on Superduty
Howdy folks, new F-250 and looking for new, and larger tires. I'm going to eventually source a set of extra wheels for it as well, and would like to go with 22" rather than the stock 20's.
These tires: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...es#testResults
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, and the size will be 325/55/22. This is a 36" tire basically, which compares to the 34" tire already on it. There appears to be enough clearance for the extra inch all around, however there are also wider, not just taller, so hoping they will fit.
I don't want or need a M/T tire, just not how I use the truck. It's my daily driver, and will be pulling a boat and trailer set-up that would be just over 10,000 pounds (boat is 7300 pounds dry). Off-roading isn't on my list of driving habits, not really. This is the only tire in this size, and it seems to be a good road-going tire. I've had them on a Navigator in the past, did very well. These are P-Rated, not LT rated. So the load rating is 116, versus the 123 that is on the truck. My truck is the 9900 pound GVWR option, so as light as these trucks can actually be configured. The tire in question has a load rating of 2760 pounds, which would equate to 11,040 pounds for the four of them, well above the 9900 pound GVWR of my truck. This would allow for some differential loading, meaning the rear could be loaded more than the front, leaving room for the payload of this truck, which is just under 2000 pounds.
Also, if I run a forged wheel (and not too wide, like 9" wide), the entire set-up should be no heavier, and maybe lighter, than the stock set-up, meaning handling and fuel economy would not be negatively impacted. This seems like a good thing.
The question is, could this be acceptable to use in this application? The load rating seems to be there. They run less pressure for that load rating, which could help the ride I suppose a little, is this any kind of problem?
For those with any experience with all this, please do help me with your experiences and thoughts!
Many thanks in advance,
AidenFC
These tires: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...es#testResults
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, and the size will be 325/55/22. This is a 36" tire basically, which compares to the 34" tire already on it. There appears to be enough clearance for the extra inch all around, however there are also wider, not just taller, so hoping they will fit.
I don't want or need a M/T tire, just not how I use the truck. It's my daily driver, and will be pulling a boat and trailer set-up that would be just over 10,000 pounds (boat is 7300 pounds dry). Off-roading isn't on my list of driving habits, not really. This is the only tire in this size, and it seems to be a good road-going tire. I've had them on a Navigator in the past, did very well. These are P-Rated, not LT rated. So the load rating is 116, versus the 123 that is on the truck. My truck is the 9900 pound GVWR option, so as light as these trucks can actually be configured. The tire in question has a load rating of 2760 pounds, which would equate to 11,040 pounds for the four of them, well above the 9900 pound GVWR of my truck. This would allow for some differential loading, meaning the rear could be loaded more than the front, leaving room for the payload of this truck, which is just under 2000 pounds.
Also, if I run a forged wheel (and not too wide, like 9" wide), the entire set-up should be no heavier, and maybe lighter, than the stock set-up, meaning handling and fuel economy would not be negatively impacted. This seems like a good thing.
The question is, could this be acceptable to use in this application? The load rating seems to be there. They run less pressure for that load rating, which could help the ride I suppose a little, is this any kind of problem?
For those with any experience with all this, please do help me with your experiences and thoughts!
Many thanks in advance,
AidenFC
#2
#3
#4
Howdy folks, new F-250 and looking for new, and larger tires. I'm going to eventually source a set of extra wheels for it as well, and would like to go with 22" rather than the stock 20's.
These tires: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...es#testResults
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, and the size will be 325/55/22. This is a 36" tire basically, which compares to the 34" tire already on it. There appears to be enough clearance for the extra inch all around, however there are also wider, not just taller, so hoping they will fit.
I don't want or need a M/T tire, just not how I use the truck. It's my daily driver, and will be pulling a boat and trailer set-up that would be just over 10,000 pounds (boat is 7300 pounds dry). Off-roading isn't on my list of driving habits, not really. This is the only tire in this size, and it seems to be a good road-going tire. I've had them on a Navigator in the past, did very well. These are P-Rated, not LT rated. So the load rating is 116, versus the 123 that is on the truck. My truck is the 9900 pound GVWR option, so as light as these trucks can actually be configured. The tire in question has a load rating of 2760 pounds, which would equate to 11,040 pounds for the four of them, well above the 9900 pound GVWR of my truck. This would allow for some differential loading, meaning the rear could be loaded more than the front, leaving room for the payload of this truck, which is just under 2000 pounds.
Also, if I run a forged wheel (and not too wide, like 9" wide), the entire set-up should be no heavier, and maybe lighter, than the stock set-up, meaning handling and fuel economy would not be negatively impacted. This seems like a good thing.
The question is, could this be acceptable to use in this application? The load rating seems to be there. They run less pressure for that load rating, which could help the ride I suppose a little, is this any kind of problem?
For those with any experience with all this, please do help me with your experiences and thoughts!
Many thanks in advance,
AidenFC
These tires: https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tires...es#testResults
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, and the size will be 325/55/22. This is a 36" tire basically, which compares to the 34" tire already on it. There appears to be enough clearance for the extra inch all around, however there are also wider, not just taller, so hoping they will fit.
I don't want or need a M/T tire, just not how I use the truck. It's my daily driver, and will be pulling a boat and trailer set-up that would be just over 10,000 pounds (boat is 7300 pounds dry). Off-roading isn't on my list of driving habits, not really. This is the only tire in this size, and it seems to be a good road-going tire. I've had them on a Navigator in the past, did very well. These are P-Rated, not LT rated. So the load rating is 116, versus the 123 that is on the truck. My truck is the 9900 pound GVWR option, so as light as these trucks can actually be configured. The tire in question has a load rating of 2760 pounds, which would equate to 11,040 pounds for the four of them, well above the 9900 pound GVWR of my truck. This would allow for some differential loading, meaning the rear could be loaded more than the front, leaving room for the payload of this truck, which is just under 2000 pounds.
Also, if I run a forged wheel (and not too wide, like 9" wide), the entire set-up should be no heavier, and maybe lighter, than the stock set-up, meaning handling and fuel economy would not be negatively impacted. This seems like a good thing.
The question is, could this be acceptable to use in this application? The load rating seems to be there. They run less pressure for that load rating, which could help the ride I suppose a little, is this any kind of problem?
For those with any experience with all this, please do help me with your experiences and thoughts!
Many thanks in advance,
AidenFC
I would also say that when hauling with P tires things will feel a bit more squishy because the sidewalls are not as firm. This also gives you a softer ride as a result. I went from P to LT on my F150. Ride was slightly worse but tow was slightly better.
If you are comfortable with the weights and ride no reason I could see to not go do it.
#5
#6
#7
Thanks DbleDan, good point on the axle weight rating. OK, the front GAWR is 5200 pounds. The Rear GAWR is 6340 pounds. That's 11,540, and the GVWR for the truck is 9900 pounds.
How does this work?
Not sure how that all adds up, but the Rear GAWR is too high for these tires now. Crazyness.
How does this work?
Not sure how that all adds up, but the Rear GAWR is too high for these tires now. Crazyness.
Trending Topics
#8
Be careful with P tires on SUVs and light trucks, as their load rating must be reduced by ~9%. Here’s the industry standard guidance, in this case from Toyo:
P-Metric or hard metric tires on Light Trucks
When a P-metric or metric tire is installed on a light truck (SUV, pickup, minivan), the load capacity of the tire is reduced by a factor of 1.101 as prescribed by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). For example, 305/50R20 has a maximum load capacity of 3086 lbs. If this tire is fitted to a light truck, then the actual allowable load capacity for the tire is 2805 lbs. (3086 lbs. divided by 1.1). If you replace the original tires with the exact same type (P-metric, hard metric, LT-metric, or flotation), size designations, and ply as the tires that were originally installed, just follow the vehicle’s tire information placard for proper inflation pressures. If, however, you apply a ‘Plus zero’ or plus-1, etc., fitment to a light truck, you must discount the replacement tire’s load by the 1.10 factor and ensure that the replacement tire has sufficient load capacity by inflation to support the load of the originally installed tires.
HTH,
Jim / crewzer
P-Metric or hard metric tires on Light Trucks
When a P-metric or metric tire is installed on a light truck (SUV, pickup, minivan), the load capacity of the tire is reduced by a factor of 1.101 as prescribed by the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). For example, 305/50R20 has a maximum load capacity of 3086 lbs. If this tire is fitted to a light truck, then the actual allowable load capacity for the tire is 2805 lbs. (3086 lbs. divided by 1.1). If you replace the original tires with the exact same type (P-metric, hard metric, LT-metric, or flotation), size designations, and ply as the tires that were originally installed, just follow the vehicle’s tire information placard for proper inflation pressures. If, however, you apply a ‘Plus zero’ or plus-1, etc., fitment to a light truck, you must discount the replacement tire’s load by the 1.10 factor and ensure that the replacement tire has sufficient load capacity by inflation to support the load of the originally installed tires.
HTH,
Jim / crewzer
#9
#10
Thanks DbleDan, good point on the axle weight rating. OK, the front GAWR is 5200 pounds. The Rear GAWR is 6340 pounds. That's 11,540, and the GVWR for the truck is 9900 pounds.
How does this work?
Not sure how that all adds up, but the Rear GAWR is too high for these tires now. Crazyness.
How does this work?
Not sure how that all adds up, but the Rear GAWR is too high for these tires now. Crazyness.
#11
Hey guys, thanks again for the info. With the 10% derating, I simply would never known, thanks Jim!
So this 9900 rating is a 'paper de-rate', and the truck is actually capable of more... I think that from a liability or insurance or regulatory perspective, being over the 9900 pounds total, or the 1966 pounds payload, including passengers and cargo, do you think this is correct? Which really means I couldn't legally overload these tires anyway, even if the axle ratings are higher.
Thoughts on that?
In reality, this boat tow is the biggest load it'll likely ever see anyway...
Or am I just trying to cherry pick one data point to make it fit the outcome I want!!??
Thx again!
So this 9900 rating is a 'paper de-rate', and the truck is actually capable of more... I think that from a liability or insurance or regulatory perspective, being over the 9900 pounds total, or the 1966 pounds payload, including passengers and cargo, do you think this is correct? Which really means I couldn't legally overload these tires anyway, even if the axle ratings are higher.
Thoughts on that?
In reality, this boat tow is the biggest load it'll likely ever see anyway...
Or am I just trying to cherry pick one data point to make it fit the outcome I want!!??
Thx again!
#12
#13
Thanks DbleDan, good point on the axle weight rating. OK, the front GAWR is 5200 pounds. The Rear GAWR is 6340 pounds. That's 11,540, and the GVWR for the truck is 9900 pounds.
How does this work?
Not sure how that all adds up, but the Rear GAWR is too high for these tires now. Crazyness.
How does this work?
Not sure how that all adds up, but the Rear GAWR is too high for these tires now. Crazyness.
The reason I suggest weighing it is to make sure you would not be over the max tire weights.
Others are right that trucks are de-rated on paper for tax and registration reasons.
#14
#15