Wrong Bed?
Looks like a fairly clean truck, but no match for your Ranger as far as cool factor. This truck is a Standard Cab instead of a Custom Cab, too.
F10 - F100 5,000 G.V.W Rating
J - 223 6 cylinder
R - San Jose, CA assembly plant
363879 - 1963 model year - built December 1962
114" Wheelbase.
J - Rangoon Red Color code
F100 - F100 2x4 5,000 Lbs GVWR
81A - Standard Cab
G - 3 speed C/M
12 - Ford 9" 3.89 (3.3M) Non-Limited Slip
5,000 lbs. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating.
114 net HP @ 3,600 RPM
74 - District Sales Office - Seattle, WA
FORDification.info - The '61-'66 Ford Pickup Resource
I have a 1965 F-250 4x4. 20 years ago I was with a buddy out in South Dakota at a junk yard. We found a 58 ford truck with an unbelievably clean bed. Same style as my F-250 4x4. So we brought it back to Michigan. Went to put it on my 65. And the darn thing didn’t fit. It hit the cab before the wheel lined up with the wheel well. Turns out it was a 9’ bed and my 65 had an 8’ bed.
Not wanting to waste the bed and thinking I’d never find another, we stretched the frame 14” and relocated the rear axle.
As far as I know I’m the only guy with a 65 F-250 4x4 w/ a 9’ bed.
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Pride and investment in the unibody for light duties ( aka the heavy duty Ranchero concept ) by management was so great in the initial stages, they thought they had a style and loadspace winner.. Separating the bodies like they did in the South American market would have admitted to failure in North America, where the large majority of their sales were. Not good timing since it was immediately after the Edsel failure. Ford decided to offer the older style separate styleside as a option without any new investment, but soon after they discovered they badly needed to stretch the wheelbases and strengthen their beds, mainly for the camper boom, which would require new tooling, so Ford just decided to wait it out for when the completely new redesigned bed was ready.. Ford was aware of the short comings of the unibody in severe service and never offered it on the F 350 and 4x4 during '61 thru '63, South America got a few interesting vehicles during this time, somebody should be checking the craigslist ads in Argentina. How about a '66 with divorced unibody bed, twin I beam and 292?
Pride and investment in the unibody for light duties ( aka the heavy duty Ranchero concept ) by management was so great in the initial stages, they thought they had a style and loadspace winner.. Separating the bodies like they did in the South American market would have admitted to failure in North America, where the large majority of their sales were. Not good timing since it was immediately after the Edsel failure. Ford decided to offer the older style separate styleside as a option without any new investment, but soon after they discovered they badly needed to stretch the wheelbases and strengthen their beds, mainly for the camper boom, which would require new tooling, so Ford just decided to wait it out for when the completely new redesigned bed was ready.. Ford was aware of the short comings of the unibody in severe service and never offered it on the F 350 and 4x4 during '61 thru '63, South America got a few interesting vehicles during this time, somebody should be checking the craigslist ads in Argentina. How about a '66 with divorced unibody bed, twin I beam and 292?
Uni's are 1961/63 F100/250 2WD's. The bed is welded to the cab.














