When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey guys. I'm building a 56 F100, mostly from parts from anything I can find.
My question is, I have a 351c and want to put a Toploader behind it. The one I found is a HEH-J from a Galaxie. It is a close ratio. I'm just wondering on how the drivability is going be with 4:10 in the rear. I have found so many mixed comments that go completely off track from the question. It is mostly going to be driven around town and some highway. I don't want to be going 55 and red lining the engine.
Yes I do have the trans. I do not know much yet about engine internals, bought it about two weeks ago. I'm not going be out running cops on a daily base, but want it to be able to hold its own if needed.😁 I will never have it on the drag strip.
Well, that toploader will be fun with great gear spacing. The 4.10s will save you on start up and you'll be really glad for them when starting on a hill.
The RPMs at 65+ might serve as a governor for you!
Run it. Do you have your bell and clutch figured out?
IIRC '57 to maybe '60 have juice clutches. Master looks just like the brakes. We had a '58 F600 but I never inspected the under dash or clutch fork set up.
In the later model stuff, quoting information here: Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Only 1983 F250/350's with 460's or 6.9L's have it (and Rangers).
Everything else got it in 1984, except Econolines with the Mazda 5 speed > 1986 was the first year.
Many if not all will be external slave, other than Mazda and most ZF transmissions.
Econolines used a vertical master that went through the floor via a bell crank or some other Rube Goldberg linkage under the dash.
No my brake pedal is firewall mount and I was going to fabricate the clutch pedal once I found something that would work. I will be going to the pick and pull again this weekend to see what I can find.
Thanks for all the help.
I'm just wondering on how the drivability is going be with 4:10.
Folks have been driving OD transmissions for too long. The first brand new truck I ever bought was a 1972, 3/4 ton GMC with a 4.10 gear. I put over 100,000 miles on it in 3 years, mostly interstate. Never worried about how many rpms it was turning at 80mph. It only hurts the gas mileage. I have a 3.70 gear in my 65 and it turns between 26 an 2800 on the highway, it kind of likes it there and just hums along at 9 mpg. Which works out fine since at my age that puts a tank of fuel and my bladder on the same schedule.
Is that Toploader a 390 transmission ? If it is the input snout is too short to work with a small block bellhousing. It will reach to the edge of the pilot bearing/bushing but not into it, leaving the input unsupported when you engage the clutch. If you can find a longer bushing (Boss 302/Bronco) you can fix this. Otherwise you'll need a small block input shaft for it. The 390's used the small block diameter input with a shorter snout. I would look into an aftermarket hydro clutch setup for this
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.