Notices
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) Diesel Topics Only

Ford water separators?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 11:09 AM
  #1  
earlsfork's Avatar
earlsfork
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
From: Northwest
Question Ford water separators?

Recently there has been some discussion on this forum about fuel system air leaks, and the part water separators can contribute to this problem. So far I have been lucky with my 1987 6.9L F250 and its water separator. I am the second owner of the vehicle and have a question about the various manufacturers of the water separators used on trucks of my vintage. In reading the archives I get the impression that Ford used a number water separators during this period. Is it safe to assume they weren’t manufacturing these units, but rather sourcing them from outside suppliers? The reason I ask, is that upon inspection of the top of the water separator on my rig I see the name Stanadyne cast in to the metal. Does anyone know if Ford used Stanadyne as an OEM source for their stock water separator? Or did I just get lucky after the first owner got fed up with the original equipment?

Your thoughts and insights are appreciated

Thanks, J.W.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #2  
Greywolf's Avatar
Greywolf
Fleet Owner
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 29,941
Likes: 46
From: Drummonds, TN USA
The unit itself I am not sure about. It may just be a generic part out-sourced to save having to make something they could just buy down the street somewhere...

I do know they had at least three types in the eighties -
One had a pull-ring on top of it, one had a remote drain pull next to the drivers seat, and the one I have has a **** on the bottom of the replaceable element with a drain in it.

For mine, I have found they can be a little tuff to track down. I usually only go to NAPA when I can't find things anywhere else, and even they had to have one shipped from L.A. to San Diego overnight! Since they seemed a bit hard to come by, I went ahead and got two of them @ eighteen dollars apiece (after discount).

Even if your truck isn't leaking or having other problems, I would strongly suggest getting one of these because for all you know it may be the original, unchanged in sixteen years! And prudence kind of indicates getting a spare just in case that cannot be found at all later on...

I'm sure something suitable could be swapped in to replace the whole works because it is highly doubful diesels will ever go away, but I've been stuck a few times waiting for parts to come in, and I much prefer maintaining my own stock of "possibles".


~Wolf
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2003 | 11:48 PM
  #3  
dieselzen's Avatar
dieselzen
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 1
From: Alabama Gulf Coast
Earlsfork,

I know Stanadyne was (is?) the oem manufacturer for Ford regarding injection pumps and injectors. I've never really looked too closely at the fuel/water separator bracket and head. It's kinda difficult on a van.
I've read many threads of guys installing an aftermarket fuel/water sep. before or after the lift pump in an easily accessible place. Then you can leave the stock fuel filter in place forever and take care of the water draining and separating at the aftermarket filter. Racor has a nice line.
R.A.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2003 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
GregA's Avatar
GregA
Tuned
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 53
From: Connecticut
Maybe I don't understand the question, but are you concerned about what I call the "fuel filter mounting bracket"? I have a 1993 E-350 which uses a spin-on replaceable element mounted on top of the engine.

The original implementation was a center filter element sandwiched between two cast metal parts. The lower part, what I call the water separator, screwed onto the element and then that screwed into the mounting bracket just like an oil filter. I replaced the whole setup with NAPA part number 3617 which eliminates the lower portion, giving me a single oil-filter-type element that I screw into the upper part. This 3617 incorporates on its bottom a drain screw and a threaded hole into which I insert the water sensor. To top it off that replacement filter is even cheaper than the original replacement element that incorporated the metal lower portion.

Sorry if I've got the terminology incorrect, but I fail to see how this can create problems with air, as long as the lines are maintained properly.

Greg
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2003 | 10:09 AM
  #5  
earlsfork's Avatar
earlsfork
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 1
From: Northwest
Greg,

The unit I was asking about is mounted in the engine bay on the fire wall. This would be on the drives side. It is a pull ring type fuel/water separator. By pulling the ring up, the collected water is released from the bottom of the unit. Although my water separator hasn't caused me air leak grief (yet), many folks have reported problems with the pull ring type units. Your NAPA set-up sounds like a better solution.

Thanks to everyone for the replies.

JW
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2003 | 10:19 AM
  #6  
Spectramac's Avatar
Spectramac
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, WA
The old ring pull separator is a ticking time bomb on your firewall. Sooner or later it will start sucking air through the drain hose. This usually happens after someone realizes it's been a long time since they drained it, and gives it a pull. Unless you live in an area with a lot a water in the local fuel stations, you can just take it out and hook the two hoses together. I did this to my '87 and have had no problems, I change the fuel filter every other oil change. It is a lot cheaper than hunting down expensive Racor elements.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE