1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

239 Y-block "refresh"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-29-2018, 03:52 PM
55RoundTwo's Avatar
55RoundTwo
55RoundTwo is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northwest PA (Erie)
Posts: 106
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
239 Y-block "refresh"?

I got my hands on a running 239 y-block (and 4-speed Borg-Warner tranny) out of a '55 F-350 that's headed for my '55 F-100. It has ~79000 miles on it, and still runs really good.

Was wondering, though... should I think about a total rebuild, or is there a basic "refresh" kinda thing that would be sufficient for a good-running engine with relatively low mileage?

Thanks in advance,
​​​​​​​Scott
 
  #2  
Old 07-29-2018, 11:54 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
79,000 miles was rebuild time in the old days (or getting close to it). Personally I'd at least pull the intake manifold and check for sludge, and the rocker covers to check for wear on the valve train. Y-blocks were known for both. Keeping the oil passages open to the rockers is essential. Do you know if the engine has ever been open before?
 
  #3  
Old 07-30-2018, 05:43 AM
55RoundTwo's Avatar
55RoundTwo
55RoundTwo is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northwest PA (Erie)
Posts: 106
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1
79,000 miles was rebuild time in the old days (or getting close to it). Personally I'd at least pull the intake manifold and check for sludge, and the rocker covers to check for wear on the valve train. Y-blocks were known for both. Keeping the oil passages open to the rockers is essential. Do you know if the engine has ever been open before?
I will definitely do that. The F-350 is a fully functional dump that the guy I bought it from still worked at least once a week. He owned a service shop and, although I'm not 100% sure, it wouldn't surprise one bit to find that he's done this a time or two (he's had the truck for 36 years). Thanks for the advice.
Scott
 
  #4  
Old 07-30-2018, 07:49 AM
1954wrecker's Avatar
1954wrecker
1954wrecker is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got a quote of 5k to rebuild a 239 Y block. If that’s a real figure...than I would run it for as long as possible if it’s running good.

Chris
 
  #5  
Old 07-30-2018, 10:07 AM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Originally Posted by 1954wrecker
I got a quote of 5k to rebuild a 239 Y block. If that’s a real figure...than I would run it for as long as possible if it’s running good.

Chris
That figure sounds like a shop that doesn't want the work, honestly. It's the same with flatheads, there is nothing really special about them but I've seen rebuild quotes posted anywhere from $2500 to $7000. In the case of the early Y-blocks, some parts may be harder to find and more expensive, but they aren't fundamentally different than the typical SBC.
 
  #6  
Old 07-30-2018, 11:41 AM
BlueOvalRage's Avatar
BlueOvalRage
BlueOvalRage is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Oxford, Indiana
Posts: 2,571
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
If it's running well now, I would go to the extra effort and pull the heads and have the valves done and have new hardened exhaust seats installed. These old engines were designed to run on unleaded fuel and extended use on today's fuels can cause the exhaust valve seats to erode and the valves to recede. This is not good with solid lifters and fully adjustable rockers like the 239 has because the valve can only recede so far into the seat before the lash is taken up and it has nowhere else to go. And then it leaks. And then it gets burnt. Not good. Save yourself the headache if you plan to put some miles on the thing and get the heads done and seats installed now while it's out.
 
  #7  
Old 07-30-2018, 11:45 AM
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
bjmayberry2 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wentzville, MO
Posts: 8,318
Received 543 Likes on 349 Posts
Originally Posted by 55RoundTwo
I got my hands on a running 239 y-block (and 4-speed Borg-Warner tranny) out of a '55 F-350 that's headed for my '55 F-100. It has ~79000 miles on it, and still runs really good.

Was wondering, though... should I think about a total rebuild, or is there a basic "refresh" kinda thing that would be sufficient for a good-running engine with relatively low mileage?

Thanks in advance,
Scott
Oh the questions. What's the PO doing with the truck if he's removing the engine and Tranny. I'm sure the cab would be of interest to someone on this site.
These old trucks were used hard and often not well kept so as ALBQU-F1 said that mileage would definitely suggest a compete overhaul if it's not been opened up. If it were me, I would look under the valve covers and Valley Pan as suggested. If it's clean I'd put it back together and drive it for a season or so.If it's caked with goo, rebuild it.
 
  #8  
Old 08-12-2018, 07:18 AM
55RoundTwo's Avatar
55RoundTwo
55RoundTwo is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northwest PA (Erie)
Posts: 106
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bjmayberry2
Oh the questions. What's the PO doing with the truck if he's removing the engine and Tranny. I'm sure the cab would be of interest to someone on this site.
These old trucks were used hard and often not well kept so as ALBQU-F1 said that mileage would definitely suggest a compete overhaul if it's not been opened up. If it were me, I would look under the valve covers and Valley Pan as suggested. If it's clean I'd put it back together and drive it for a season or so.If it's caked with goo, rebuild it.
To answer the first question - the F350 has a new home already. It went to a fella who owns a small farm, who has an engine/tranny to drop in and put the truck back to work.

I discovered something yesterday as I was trying to clean this old girl up a little... the original yellow paint is still very much visible on the intake manifold, block, oil pan, and bell housing. The heads and rocker covers, though, are painted black. I think this is a good indicator that the heads were worked on somewhere along the line, because all of the pictures that I found show that the heads were also yellow:



I took the rocker cover off of one side to take a look, and don't see any real signs of excessive sludge or wear. But I will admit, I'm not familiar enough to know exactly what to look for.
 
  #9  
Old 08-12-2018, 07:58 AM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
raytasch is online now
Believe Nothing

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Central FL.
Posts: 7,329
Received 244 Likes on 153 Posts
Yes, black heads and valve covers would suggest the heads have been off. The problem with these engines was the oil passage between the block and the head. There is an offset of about an inch where the oil had a tendency to congeal or coke and block flow to the rockers. I would make sure the valves are in adjustment, do frequent oil changes and run it.
 
  #10  
Old 08-12-2018, 08:36 AM
55RoundTwo's Avatar
55RoundTwo
55RoundTwo is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northwest PA (Erie)
Posts: 106
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
I guess it makes sense to think that there was more work done to the heads than just cleaning the passages, though, because they were painted a different color, right?

I'm planning on pulling the heads anyway and doing the valve work suggested by BlueOvalRage in reply #6, because it would be stupid not to with the engine being out. The Dennis Carpenter catalog lists pistons for the 239, but only shows for years 48-53 (flathead?) and not for 54 and up. I would like to think that the bore would be the same, but if that's the case, wouldn't they show them as applicable to 54-55 as well? None of the gasket kits they offer list the 54-and-up 239, just for 48-53. But based on what I have removed from my engine so far, it looks like the gaskets shown for the 54-64 256 and 272 engines are the same. Also, they include 54-55 for all the camshaft, crankshaft, valve, and rocker arm parts, though. Confusing.... l guess I'll need to call and talk to someone.

Thanks for your input.
 
  #11  
Old 08-12-2018, 09:44 AM
raytasch's Avatar
raytasch
raytasch is online now
Believe Nothing

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: W. Central FL.
Posts: 7,329
Received 244 Likes on 153 Posts
I would think anyone pulling heads for any reason would do a valve job. Short story is, we don't know. All we know is the engine runs good. (79000 miles on it, and still runs really good) We don't know what kind of compression the engine has or do we? Can we see a good flow of oil to both ends of both rocker shafts?

Blue oval rage brought up the problems with valves burning when they recess and close up. This is why it is so important to keep the solid valve lifters in adjustment to prevent them from closing up and burning..

That early Y block had many similarities with the later Y blocks and many parts are not interchangeable. There has been lots of discussion about the differences. I am not knowledgeable enough on the differences to make positive statements as to the differences.

Edit: I would drop and pan and see what things looked like there.
 
  #12  
Old 08-12-2018, 12:13 PM
bjmayberry2's Avatar
bjmayberry2
bjmayberry2 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Wentzville, MO
Posts: 8,318
Received 543 Likes on 349 Posts
Maybe these will help:
Y
https://www.enginelabs.com/news/hist...-of-the-1950s/
Y

Also you might have better input from the Y-Block forum. https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/forum56/
 
  #13  
Old 08-12-2018, 01:32 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,800
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
Originally Posted by 55RoundTwo

...The Dennis Carpenter catalog lists pistons for the 239, but only shows for years 48-53 (flathead?) and not for 54 and up. I would like to think that the bore would be the same, but if that's the case, wouldn't they show them as applicable to 54-55 as well? ....
Check with Egge Machine for the correct pistons. DC is listing flat V8 pistons, not the Y-block 239. Likewise, check a FelPro catalog for the correct gaskets.
 
  #14  
Old 08-12-2018, 05:24 PM
abe's Avatar
abe
abe is online now
One Meadow Green Owner

Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Central PA
Posts: 22,178
Received 2,615 Likes on 1,456 Posts
I, too, recommend the Felpro gaskets. Do you have a shop manual for 54/55?

Good point ray brought up about clogged oil passages. Should not have that problem today with detergent oil and proper oil changes
 
  #15  
Old 08-12-2018, 05:35 PM
55RoundTwo's Avatar
55RoundTwo
55RoundTwo is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northwest PA (Erie)
Posts: 106
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by abe
I, too, recommend the Felpro gaskets. Do you have a shop manual for 54/55?
I do... it's the very first thing I bought, after the truck itself. I had one 25+ years ago with my first truck, but after 3 moves, who knows where it ended up.
 


Quick Reply: 239 Y-block "refresh"?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.