Dana 44-3 Rear Axle /3.00-1/ 2,900 lbs Axle Capacity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-02-2018, 10:03 AM
BeauF0RD's Avatar
BeauF0RD
BeauF0RD is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dana 44-3 Rear Axle /3.00-1/ 2,900 lbs Axle Capacity

So this is the information that was taken from the data plate, Dana 44-3 Rear Axle /3.00-1 /2,900 lbs Axle Capacity. I have a 302 engine with a 3.03 3-speed transmission and I just want to use this truck to beat around the back roads. The 3.00-1 is a really high gear right? I have a rear end seal leak and I figure when I open it up I may as well change the gearing and get some type of possi. Can someone please tell me how high a 3.00-1 is and what is the best gearing for back road shenanigans? Thanks,
 
  #2  
Old 04-02-2018, 11:34 AM
BeauF0RD's Avatar
BeauF0RD
BeauF0RD is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The truck is a 2 wheel drive also, I suppose that matters. Tires are P 235/ 75 R 15 = 27 in. diameter.
 
  #3  
Old 04-02-2018, 02:08 PM
BeauF0RD's Avatar
BeauF0RD
BeauF0RD is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

This is my rear axle but I’m finding out it’s not a Dana 44. What is it?
 
  #4  
Old 04-02-2018, 02:13 PM
BeauF0RD's Avatar
BeauF0RD
BeauF0RD is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I’m thinking a Ford 8 inch?
 
  #5  
Old 04-02-2018, 02:22 PM
BeauF0RD's Avatar
BeauF0RD
BeauF0RD is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Maybe 9 inch?
 
  #6  
Old 04-02-2018, 05:49 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,879
Received 1,597 Likes on 1,302 Posts
That's a 9 inch. 3.00 is pretty tall, I had that ratio in a '65 Mustang with a 289, 303 trans and 25 to 26" tires. In the Mustang it was ok, with your weight and tire it might be a little doggy on the low end.

If you want a limited slip, it will cost you some money. Frankly, with your motor, gearing a weight, just upgrade your rear tires if you are going to be on dirt and you'll have fewer traction issues. You really shouldn't be having too many traction issues on pavement unless you are pitching it sideways in every corner. If you like doing that, the limited slip or locker will help you find the ditch sooner.
 
  #7  
Old 04-02-2018, 06:14 PM
BeauF0RD's Avatar
BeauF0RD
BeauF0RD is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: York Pa.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well now knowing it’s a 9 inch and not a Dana44 I have no idea what my gearing is. Time to do more research I guess.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
System
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
38
11-02-2016 10:26 PM
junks
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
4
08-29-2010 05:34 PM
bmarkline
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
08-06-2008 02:14 AM
Dieseldan7.3
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
13
02-02-2005 07:12 PM



Quick Reply: Dana 44-3 Rear Axle /3.00-1/ 2,900 lbs Axle Capacity



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.