Notices
Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Ford vs. Chevy V8s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2018 | 08:15 PM
  #1  
evan_nugget's Avatar
evan_nugget
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 138
From: Manassas, VA
Ford vs. Chevy V8s?

Here's a Ford vs. Chevy question that I can't seem to find the answer to after searching online. Consider any Ford and Chevy 1/2 ton from the late '80s and '90s with a V8. Why is it that in the majority of the Chevy pickups have the 350 and not many have the 305, yet Ford is somewhat the opposite, with the majority of trucks I've run across having the 302 and a few having the 351?

I'm gonna hazard a guess at different marketing for Chevy vs. Ford? I've heard the 302 is better than the 305...
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2018 | 09:01 AM
  #2  
Buliwyf's Avatar
Buliwyf
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 8
302 was a decent engine. Ford was trying to get a more practical engine for 1/2 tons. 5.7 liters is a bit much. I was thrilled with the 2v 4.6L in F150's.
 
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2018 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
80'BUB's Avatar
80'BUB
Cross-Country
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Lee county FL
302 is better IMO than the 305. 5.7 liters or higher is not too much, again . In my opinion. The real win is with the 351. I prefer the Cleveland, a 4 year run engine in the US. SBF bolt pattern, and same motor mounts. Tons of power. 351W is an amazing power plant too. Oodles of aftermarket and the parts availability is stellar. Power by Ford
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2018 | 04:48 PM
  #4  
evan_nugget's Avatar
evan_nugget
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 138
From: Manassas, VA
Originally Posted by 80'BUB
302 is better IMO than the 305. 5.7 liters or higher is not too much, again . In my opinion. The real win is with the 351. I prefer the Cleveland, a 4 year run engine in the US. SBF bolt pattern, and same motor mounts. Tons of power. 351W is an amazing power plant too. Oodles of aftermarket and the parts availability is stellar. Power by Ford
I agree with you 100%, though I've personally never had any experience with the 351C. But what I'm curious about is why then if the 351W is such a good engine do we not see more in the 1/2 tons? Seems to me that every 1980s/1990s GM 1/2 ton on Craigslist has the 350, while most Fords have the 302. Price difference maybe?
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2018 | 06:52 PM
  #5  
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
Logistics Pro
5 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 483
From: Southern OH
Originally Posted by Buliwyf
302 was a decent engine. Ford was trying to get a more practical engine for 1/2 tons. 5.7 liters is a bit much. I was thrilled with the 2v 4.6L in F150's.
You where thrilled with the 4.6? That is the most gutless v8 I have ever driven, and I have driven several vans and pickups that had the 4.6, it feels like a v6, I am surprised Ford kept that engine as long as they did.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2018 | 07:01 PM
  #6  
Mickey Bitsko's Avatar
Mickey Bitsko
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 750
Likes: 94
From: Pagosa Springs CO.
SMH. ^^ ^^^
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2018 | 03:01 PM
  #7  
dave91gt's Avatar
dave91gt
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 12
From: Kenna,wv
The only thing I can guess is Ford had the 351 neutered back then and it really didn't show enough separation from the 302 to see enough performance gains to justify the mpg hit.
Don't get me wrong- the bore and stroke of the 351 is better suited for a truck engine. If only they had put a set of cylinder heads on it to bring it to life.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2019 | 07:42 PM
  #8  
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 7
The 302 was a solid performer. My first truck in high school was a 1990 F-150 XLT Lariat Super Cab 2WD with the 302, and being the stupid kids we were, I occasionally raced my friends, one of whom had a 1993 Silverado of similar configuration to my truck, only his was powered by a throttle body 350. He never could keep up with me. I always pulled at least a truck length or more on him, the 305's were a complete joke, pretty much ran like a full size truck with V6 that just sounded better. Another of my friends had an 85 Bronco that had a H.O carburetor 351 in it, but it was easily the slowest vehicle out of all of them, I don't blame the engine so much in its case though, that truck was worn all to hell and he had 38inch Swampers on it to boot. It really couldn't even get out of its own way.

IMO, Ford's 302 was on par with the TBI 350's, and then GM really took the lead when they came out with the Vortec series 350 in 1995 or 1996. The few 351 Ford's I've driven seemed like they pulled pretty hard, they always seemed to have a lot of torque down low which was nice.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 11, 2019 | 08:36 PM
  #9  
evan_nugget's Avatar
evan_nugget
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 138
From: Manassas, VA
Originally Posted by dave91gt
The only thing I can guess is Ford had the 351 neutered back then and it really didn't show enough separation from the 302 to see enough performance gains to justify the mpg hit.
Don't get me wrong- the bore and stroke of the 351 is better suited for a truck engine. If only they had put a set of cylinder heads on it to bring it to life.
Originally Posted by 640 CI Aluminum FORD
The 302 was a solid performer. My first truck in high school was a 1990 F-150 XLT Lariat Super Cab 2WD with the 302, and being the stupid kids we were, I occasionally raced my friends, one of whom had a 1993 Silverado of similar configuration to my truck, only his was powered by a throttle body 350. He never could keep up with me. I always pulled at least a truck length or more on him, the 305's were a complete joke, pretty much ran like a full size truck with V6 that just sounded better. Another of my friends had an 85 Bronco that had a H.O carburetor 351 in it, but it was easily the slowest vehicle out of all of them, I don't blame the engine so much in its case though, that truck was worn all to hell and he had 38inch Swampers on it to boot. It really couldn't even get out of its own way.

IMO, Ford's 302 was on par with the TBI 350's, and then GM really took the lead when they came out with the Vortec series 350 in 1995 or 1996. The few 351 Ford's I've driven seemed like they pulled pretty hard, they always seemed to have a lot of torque down low which was nice.
Appreciate y'all chiming in. I'm not implying that the 302 is at all a bad engine - I'd actually prefer it over the 300 big six I have in my F-150 now. I guess a 21-year old college kid just sees one truck motor that is 302ci and another that is 350ci and wonders why Ford wouldn't counter with their larger displacement smallblock. But then again, I suppose it's up to the customer to order the engine they wanted and more GM owners wanted the 350 while Ford owners were content with a 302. Ford may have had the edge with their MPFI since 1985 or so, while the Chevrolets continued to use TBI up to the Vortecs??????

I just bought a 1988 Bronco for my little brother (he gets his learners permit in a month). One of our neighborhood friends has a super clean blue '89 Bronco, lifted and running 35s I believe. Anyway he is soooo proud of his 302 smallblock! Plastered "5.0" badges on both sides. 100% stock engine though - only modifications are duals and glasspacks. Still running stock 3.55 gears. He couldn't figure out why our red Bronco kept whipping him every drag race down burnout alley - since under the hood our engines looked the same! Eventually I had to break it to him that Andy's (little bro) Bronco didn't have a 302 under the hood - it had a 351. He'd never heard of it - he thought 302 was it for the Broncos. He watches his step now

If anyone else would like to chime in, please do!
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2020 | 07:12 PM
  #10  
JJF20's Avatar
JJF20
Hotshot
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 17,484
Likes: 2,773
From: Northern Ontario
I think they were all decent engines for their day. As far as a 302 beating a 350, or a 305 beating a 4.6, imho, a lot, if not most, has to do with gearing, tire sizes, etc etc. I’ve had several 350’s over the years. Good engines, bullet proof. There is a reason a lot of ford resto mod hot rodders use the quintessential SBC. but, that will be a debate for the ages. I had a 305 in an early 80’ s half ton. It was okish, and eventually cranked a head. Had another one in a mid 90’s truck, it was okish again. Had several 350’s in 3/4 tons. Good engines, trucks wore out before the engine. Aside from fords trucks, I currently have a 350 In a yukon. Again, nice little engine. Lots of power, and never an issue. It’s 23 years old now. And I kept a 350 out of a 77 gmc, 4 bolt. Just in case I ever have a need for it - the heads are boat anchors.

I always thought ford builds a tougher truck, but GM builds a better engine... go ahead. Flame away!

 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2020 | 05:42 PM
  #11  
SDDL-UP's Avatar
SDDL-UP
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 103
From: North Idaho
My folks had a 1986 Chevy Blazer for a few years, purchased new. It had the 305 and that particular engine was a colossal piece of junk. The 302 and 351W are both pretty solid engines, as already stated, Ford just never put a good cylinder head on the 351W.
 
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2020 | 03:55 PM
  #12  
Dan P's Avatar
Dan P
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 159
Likes: 6
From: Lodi, Ca
Originally Posted by SDDL-UP
My folks had a 1986 Chevy Blazer for a few years, purchased new. It had the 305 and that particular engine was a colossal piece of junk. The 302 and 351W are both pretty solid engines, as already stated, Ford just never put a good cylinder head on the 351W.
My experience with Ford Vs Chevys are mostly in boat engines, where Ford really shines, and the Chevy 305 is a dog.. . Having said that,, a heavy cruiser with a 305 was a complete gutless wonder, but replacing it with a 350 was like a bolt of lighting hit it, so the 305 Chevy IMO is a waste of time.i knew farmers with the 305 in their trucks too and couldn't tow anything. I really like the 350 and you can do alot with...simple, cheap and reliable performance, but the 351 has much better and smoother low end torque....again in a heavy boat (7k+ lbs) the 351W became my favorite.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ford390fe
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
160
Nov 19, 2007 09:20 AM
Fords_12345
Ford vs The Competition
36
Aug 25, 2005 11:57 PM
'87BroncoII
Bronco II
1
Feb 19, 2005 09:58 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD
Ford vs The Competition
12
Jan 13, 2004 02:27 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE