When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does any one have any expearence on porting 97 heads?
Also is the cam shaft stright up on this year?
And last has any one in stalled roller rockers on a EFI engine or more directly what will fit under the stock valve covers?
Thanks Leadmic
You say the cam on an efi 460 goes "straight up" as would a 1968-71 cam would. WHAT IS the spec(lift/dur/050/overlap...)on the efi 460 cam. I'd like comparative specs to the 68-87(?)base cam. I have yet to see any appreciable torque out of my 91 460 motor. I still wonder what the compression ratio is but figure it to be 8.5 or so from measuring and cc'ing a similar engine's head at 97cc and miking the piston recess and dish,adding .042" for the gasket. E7/E8TE heads- with 1.98 int/1.66exh.. compared to 2.08 int 68-87 heads. I am ready to blame the cam for watery torque curves. I have a 260/270deg-.487"lift stick(cheap one from PAW) ready to go in that showed outrageous torque, set straight up on an early 460 I had with approx 10.8c.r.. I long ago got past the question of fuel mix, as I scanned the mix up and down during a long pull, finding optimum in that parameter. I did this both with my speed-density and now with my MAF conversion. As I said before I am dealing with multiple ailments at once here. BT
The EFI engines (or at least the 88-92) use a cam that dates back to 1968. In other words, the part number starts with C8. I haven't looked up which 68 engines used that cam though...
So I guess it is a "straight-up 68-up style cam. All the more reason to go to the PAW base grind. I cannot seem to get even the torque of a mid-70's smog motor and with a tad more compression yet (8.5 as opposed to 8.0)..
I have tried cams in my 4wd van with both the 460 and the 429, of :stock 68-up, M6250-A460, PAW's 260/270(liked it best 1500-4800), the 270/280 PAW, a crane HIT-292(never saw power due to mismatched lower range intake/carb((1850-list Holley)--I used the 292Crane to bleed off some of the 11.8:1 compression for pump gas-some help-power like the 270/280 grind. As I see it, most of us wish for more TORQUE in our 460's. Sometimes I do not mind treating the motor like a 289 and buzzing it. That is why God invented 429's with short stroke rev-ability. I could never tell the difference of outright HP-high end power, from a 460 over a 429. 460 has a slight edge at low revs and 429 better upstairs---my observations from my work done. I would really like to know the tricks to wake up LOW rpms in this motor. That is why our 13000 lb ambulance I drive walks away from my 6500 lb truck with the 460--torque in the realistic rpm range over a wide enough span... any hope out there naturally adpirated???
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.