Hei distributor installation
I went back and looked at my notes from 10 years ago when I replaced the TFI ignition and EEC-IV computer with the DuraSpark II ignition. It seems I forgot an important detail:
1. - My first attempt of the DSII conversion consisted of a cheap, Advance Auto parts $25 ignition module and my stock TFI E-Core coil. I did not use a ballast resistor and the ignition module burned up within 1 day.
2. - The second time I used a $65 MOTORCRAFT ignition module and my stock TFI E-Core coil. Again, I did not use a ballast resistor and that ignition module lasted about a week before it too, burned up. (That goes to show you how much better the Motorcraft ignition modules are.)
3. - Before I replaced the ignition module for the third time with another MOTORCRAFT unit, I decided not to take any more chances on a "hybrid" ignition system and so I replaced the TFI E-Core coil with the proper MOTORCRAFT DuraSpark canister-style coil and plugged in the stock resistor wire. It started right up and I haven't had an ignition problem since. That was 10 years ago.
But I will say this again: I went through all that trouble, and I couldn't feel any performance difference at all between the TFI coil and DuraSpark coil.
That *must* have been why I kept burning up ignition modules. It looks like you are correct!
I have no idea if you are right or not, as I live in the Deep South where temperatures don't get that low. But since you were right about the ballast resistor wire, you are probably right again.
Last thoughts:
My third (and final) attempt of running the DuraSpark II ignition system was used as Ford engineers intended: MOTORCRAFT ignition module, ballast resistor wire in place, and the correct MOTORCRAFT DuraSpark coil. This combination gave me the best start AND idle, believe it or not.
Ya not sure you would feel any benefit with the TFI in normal operation in the deep south. Where you might notice a difference is with worn plugs and possibly longer plug life.
That was one of the unexpected benefits of the TFI coils "seemed" to give longer longer plug life. But plug technology was changing so much in that era it is hard to say if it was the coil or the construction of the plugs that made the difference..
If you get the opportunity give it shot again some time with the TFI coil.
That was one of the unexpected benefits of the TFI coils "seemed" to give longer longer plug life. But plug technology was changing so much in that era it is hard to say if it was the coil or the construction of the plugs that made the difference..
If you get the opportunity give it shot again some time with the TFI coil.

If I am *not* in an area that experiences subzero cold starts, and temperatures NEVER even come close to -30, what would I gain by swapping to a TFI E-Core coil?
It may not be something you feel under foot but it may pay off at the pump.
Every one did not switch to them cause they were inferior to the old iron bar core coils. That tech is over 100 years old. The Coil is just a transformer, they moved away from bar core transformers in electrical applications before WWI. GM had the right idea with the HEI, just the execution was lacking.
But, since you all have experience with both, which is simpler?
My 1986 F-150, with the 4.9 liter 6, doesn't have a ballast wire so I'll have to get a 1.1 ohm ballast resistor... does anyone happen to have a link to the correct part and/or a part number I could search? Last time, I ended up buying multiple resistors and checking resistance when power was applied... Finally finding one that was 1.1 ohms.
The junk yard DS2 harness I bought is gonna need to be redone and I'm lazily contemplating the idea of HEI as it would be awesome to just run switched power to a big ugly GM distributor and sending a vaccum hose between the tree and the distributor.
Thanks all for your help... since I put the non-feedback carb in my fuel economy has gotten better... now if I can get an ignition that advances installed I'll be golden!
But, since you all have experience with both, which is simpler?
My 1986 F-150, with the 4.9 liter 6, doesn't have a ballast wire so I'll have to get a 1.1 ohm ballast resistor... does anyone happen to have a link to the correct part and/or a part number I could search? Last time, I ended up buying multiple resistors and checking resistance when power was applied... Finally finding one that was 1.1 ohms.
The junk yard DS2 harness I bought is gonna need to be redone and I'm lazily contemplating the idea of HEI as it would be awesome to just run switched power to a big ugly GM distributor and sending a vaccum hose between the tree and the distributor.
Thanks all for your help... since I put the non-feedback carb in my fuel economy has gotten better... now if I can get an ignition that advances installed I'll be golden!
Thank you again
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Thank you again
If you can find a stock Ford DSII wire harness from a 1980 - 1984 truck, I would do that over any HEI system. In addition to the DSII harness, you will need a DSII ignition module, distributor, and coil. (I suppose you could re-use your existing TFI coil, but I would not recommend it; I would use the coil that was designed specifically for the DSII.) Performance will be about the same, there will be no fitment issues, no cutting or slicing of wires, and it will still look completely stock. No one would be able to tell by looking at your engine that it did not originally come from Ford with a DSII ignition. And if you use the stock Ford parts, any mechanic can reference a shop manual to troubleshoot any sort of problems that may arise in the future.

If you can find a stock Ford DSII wire harness from a 1980 - 1984 truck, I would do that over any HEI system. In addition to the DSII harness, you will need a DSII ignition module, distributor, and coil. (I suppose you could re-use your existing TFI coil, but I would not recommend it; I would use the coil that was designed specifically for the DSII.) Performance will be about the same, there will be no fitment issues, no cutting or slicing of wires, and it will still look completely stock. No one would be able to tell by looking at your engine that it did not originally come from Ford with a DSII ignition. And if you use the stock Ford parts, any mechanic can reference a shop manual to troubleshoot any sort of problems that may arise in the future.

There is nothing wrong with using the TFI coil with the DS II system, no splicing is required. The spade connectors will unplug from the iron bar coils horse shoe connector and plug in to the TFI's connector. They are the same spade terminals.
The older style canister coils are oil filled with a simple iron bar for the magnetic flux amplification. The TFI coils use a laminated iron E core that is more efficient than the simple iron bar used in early coils, this allows for a hotter spark a the same power (amp draw) or equivalent spark out put at reduced (amp draw) power usage. This also allows e core coils to run cooler negating the need to be oil filled. Using the TFI coil with the DS II system will not negatively impact the lifespan of any of the DS II components and may actually help increase the life span of the module.
This swap is well documented and has been around since the TFI coil was introduced in the 80's .
Since you already have the TFI coil and it's mounting bracket I would retain it. This will allow you use all of your existing ignition wires wires and save you the trouble of trying to source a decent aftermarket canister coil which can be a real crap shoot in today's world.
Although the TFI coil can handle a full 12V the DS II ignition module can not reliably handle switching that voltage as a general rule. Regardless many people do feed a full; 12V to TFI coils on DS II systems with no ill effects.
If you want a DS HEI system then swap to a DS I set up this is a true HEI system unlike DS II.
Thank you again
The amount of voltage a resistor "resists" or drops, depends on how much current is flowing through it. The formula is E=IxR were E is voltage, I is current, and R is resistance. In the normal Ford system, if they designed it to average 9v at the coil, and they are using a 1.1 ohm resistor, that means 9v=?current x 1.1 resistance. 9 divided by 1.1 = 8.2amps. So the factory was expecting a average current running through the resistor of approx 8 amps, and that would give them 9v.
Your meter doesn't draw hardly any current at all. All meters use some current out of the circuit they are measuring, so they cause some error. So the better and more accurate meters(more expensive), use the least amount of current out of the circuit.
I did a google search, and found a common resistance between the probes on a digital multimeter is 10 meg ohms or 10 million ohms. So when you put your digital meter onto the resistance wire, you are completing the circuit with the meter, essentially you have a 1.1 ohm resistor in series with the 10meg ohm meter. So basically 10 meg ohm. 12v=?current X 10 meg ohm. 12 divided by 10 million = .0000012 amps in the circuit. .0000012 amps x 1.1 ohms = .00000132 volts. This would be the amount of voltage drop across the resistance wire you would have when using the meter. So the meter would read 12v minus .00000132. So the meter would read 11.99999 volts.
In other words, you will not know if you have the right wire until you get everything hooked up and the engine is running.
It will be a LOT harder (and expensive) trying to source original or even decent aftermarket parts for a DSI system over the much more common DSII system, Chief. I don't think DSI was even offered past 1979, and certainly not on the F-Series truck, so I don't know why you would even make that suggestion. And didn't you say in an earlier post that the DSI system was very problematic?
It will be a LOT harder (and expensive) trying to source original or even decent aftermarket parts for a DSI system over the much more common DSII system, Chief. I don't think DSI was even offered past 1979, and certainly not on the F-Series truck, so I don't know why you would even make that suggestion. And didn't you say in an earlier post that the DSI system was very problematic?
I do not know why anyone would push DS II when swapping to the HEI DS I is exactly the same amount of work. The only difference, the extra cost for the DS I over a DS II module. And that is still way way cheaper than any aftermarket HEI system......
I do not know why anyone would push DS II when swapping to the HEI DS I is exactly the same amount of work. The only difference, the extra cost for the DS I over a DS II module. And that is still way way cheaper than any aftermarket HEI system......
It will be extremely difficult to find a California-only DuraSpark I wire harness for his truck.
Hence if swapping to a DS system not going to the HEI DS I is kinda silly.












