Flexplate
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
I betcha a pop it has 164. 
OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A. Which in my 73/79 slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Yucaipa
You're on. I betcha a pop it has 164.
OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A. Which in my 73/79 slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.
I betcha a pop it has 164. OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A. Which in my 73/79 slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 1
From: Barre Mass
You're on. I betcha a pop it has 164.
OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A. Which in my 73/79 slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.
I betcha a pop it has 164. OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A. Which in my 73/79 slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
You're on. I betcha a pop it has 164.
OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A.
Which in my 73/79
slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.
I betcha a pop it has 164. OP never mentioned what the 302 H.O. came out of. Yesterday I guessed 1992 Mustang H.O. Which calls for a E2AZ6375A. Which replaced a E0AZ6375A.
Which in my 73/79
slide shows 164 teeth. But I can understand where you would have thought a Mustang would have been a small bell.How many teeth does a 1980/89 302 car M/T flywheel have? 157 teeth, so would the flexplate be any different?
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
1990 Mark 302 also takes E2AZ6375A according to my Ford computer Microcat program.. Nowhere in current listings do I see where Ford says how many teeth a E2AZ has. So I went in the past. E2AZ6375A replaced E0AZ6375A. So they would have the same amount of teeth. As I stated above, in my 73/79 Car slide (Section 60.3, page 10) Ford lists the E0AZ6375A fitting various vehicles with a 302 and having 164 teeth.
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
To answer your question, I think what ever that FMX bell came out of is what you ought to buy the starter for. Any Ford engineering numbers on it?
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Pass some of that popcorn over to me. I just won a pop I can drink while I'm eating it.
Because one is M/T and the other is A/T. Kinda like in the past a M/T 302 and a A/T 302 vehicle took two different 11002 part numbers.
1990 Mark 302 also takes E2AZ6375A according to my Ford computer Microcat program.. Nowhere in current listings do I see where Ford says how many teeth a E2AZ has.
So I went in the past. E2AZ6375A replaced E0AZ6375A
So they would have the same amount of teeth. As I stated above, in my 73/79 Car slide (Section 60.3, page 10) Ford lists the E0AZ6375A fitting various vehicles with a 302 and having 164 teeth.
Because one is M/T and the other is A/T. Kinda like in the past a M/T 302 and a A/T 302 vehicle took two different 11002 part numbers.
1990 Mark 302 also takes E2AZ6375A according to my Ford computer Microcat program.. Nowhere in current listings do I see where Ford says how many teeth a E2AZ has.
So I went in the past. E2AZ6375A replaced E0AZ6375A
So they would have the same amount of teeth. As I stated above, in my 73/79 Car slide (Section 60.3, page 10) Ford lists the E0AZ6375A fitting various vehicles with a 302 and having 164 teeth.
E2AZ-6375-A all 1982/89 A/T
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
There you go andrew's64, Bill just proved that the flexplate your 302 has on it now will fit both the Mark VII overdrive and your FMX. The starter your Mark 302 now has on it will prolly work. But I still think I'd get a starter for whatever your FMX bell came out of. I kinda like having the starter solenoid up on the inner fender.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals
Joe Kucinski
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer
Joe Kucinski
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)
Brett Foote
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
So andrew's64, it is up to you. I'm still betting your Mark VII 302 flexplate has 164 teeth. But I can't prove it other than You counting them.
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Yucaipa
I just remembered there is no way the E2AZ6375A could have replaced the E0AZ6375A because that is when Ford changed how the 302's are balanced.
So andrew's64, it is up to you. I'm still betting your Mark VII 302 flexplate has 164 teeth. But I can't prove it other than You counting them.
So andrew's64, it is up to you. I'm still betting your Mark VII 302 flexplate has 164 teeth. But I can't prove it other than You counting them.
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Yucaipa
The numbers i found on the bellhousing for the fmx is RF-E0AP-7976-A
Thread Starter
|
Cross-Country
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Yucaipa
i cant seem to find out what the bellhousing came out of. Anyone know where i can find what vehicle it came out of?
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
E=1980's decade.
0= the year in the decade. 1980
A=Crown Vic.
Is the tag still on the transmission? Example....PHB-BH3.
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
That engineering number doesn't show up in any of my Ford slides either. So I have to "assume" 1980 Crown Vic or Grand Marquis. 1980 CV or GM could have come from the factory with a C4,C6,AOD, or a FMX.
E=1980's decade.
0= the year in the decade. 1980
A=Crown Vic.
Is the tag still on the transmission? Example....PHB-BH3.
E=1980's decade.
0= the year in the decade. 1980
A=Crown Vic.
Is the tag still on the transmission? Example....PHB-BH3.
1979/81 LTD/Grand Marquis FMX: D9AZ-7976-A .. Converter Housing.
It cannot be a C4 or C6 or AOD housing, as all are made as part of the trans case.
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 14,255
Likes: 199
From: Phoenix, Az.
Yepper. I saw that Bill. That's what I thought it is also. None of the slides I have would go E0AP7976A forward or D9AZ7976A backwards. I tried C/REF, 73/73 F1, 73/79 M1, my Ford Microcat computer, and DOW ( new version of DOESII).