1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

Air Cleaners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-06-2017, 07:00 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Air Cleaners

I'm starting this thread so matthewq4b and I, as well as anyone else, can cuss and discuss air cleaners.

Matthew - You said the factory air cleaners are restrictive. Does that apply to all of them, including the HO version used on the 351HO and 460's? What about the dual snorkel ones used on the Mustangs?

I ask because I am/will be building a dual snorkel unit for Dad's truck, and have been planning to use one of the HO units as the base.
 
  #2  
Old 01-06-2017, 07:06 AM
1986F150six's Avatar
1986F150six
1986F150six is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sheffield, AL
Posts: 6,477
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Restrictive is a relative term, Gary. Certainly, by going to the dual snorkles, your set-up will be less restrictive than original!
 
  #3  
Old 01-06-2017, 07:13 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
That's assuming the snorkels are the restriction. I'm wondering if the larger diameter, but shorter, HO-style units are more or less restrictive than the taller standard units.
 
  #4  
Old 01-06-2017, 07:32 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,630
Likes: 0
Received 1,680 Likes on 1,357 Posts
I would think during all the factory's tweaking and road testing, it was all done with the factory aircleaner setup in place. Change one thing, it affects everything else.
 
  #5  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:00 AM
ozark1's Avatar
ozark1
ozark1 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Gary..I have a '52 Cadillac batwing on my 351 HO..
 
  #6  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:07 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
From the other thread;
Originally Posted by matthewq4b
....The factory air cleaner is not really designed to keep the inlet at a set temp it is designed to keep it from falling below a set temp. And economy was not even in the cards or they would have been much more free flowing Ford did look at this in the the early 80's When CAFE was tightening down with a ducted separate filter housing like some of the Europeans did but it was deemed to costly. These sets up did show improvements and stabilized in coming air temps better and were much better flowing, they did eventually find their way on to EFI set ups.

Open air filter elements generally are more efficient and will produce better fuel mileage and power. But also more noise and less consistent driveabilty, not exactly something that is acceptable in most production vehicles.

In most of the trucks under hoods are not an issue and an open air element will usually show improvements in both mileage and power. And if you see really cold temps you can always the swap the factory one back on in the winter that is what I used to do on the T-Bird and a few other vehicles
I'm seeking to understand where the restriction is.

Also, I'm not sure I agree that "The factory air cleaner is not really designed to keep the inlet at a set temp it is designed to keep it from falling below a set temp." If that were the case they wouldn't have plumbed the snorkel to the radiator support to get cooler air than what was available under the hood. It looks to me like Ford went to a bit of trouble and cost to get the coolest air possible in order to keep the inlet air temp as stable as they could.
 
  #7  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:18 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,630
Likes: 0
Received 1,680 Likes on 1,357 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
From the other thread;

I'm seeking to understand where the restriction is.

Also, I'm not sure I agree that "The factory air cleaner is not really designed to keep the inlet at a set temp it is designed to keep it from falling below a set temp." If that were the case they wouldn't have plumbed the snorkel to the radiator support to get cooler air than what was available under the hood. It looks to me like Ford went to a bit of trouble and cost to get the coolest air possible in order to keep the inlet air temp as stable as they cold.
I replied in the "PCV" thread before I realized that you have this thread going too, but I disagree with some things that were said also.

In my experience messing with the door in the snorkel and the sensor that runs it, the sensor actually modulates the door, the door will actually be 1/2 open, 1/4 open, etc. That tells me they did have a target temp when they designed it. I forget what manual I was reading, but 100 degrees comes to mind as the target temp for some of these setups. Then they tried to tune the carb with that in mind.

There is more restriction in the stock aircleaner setup. It's a known fact that on the holley type carbs that use venturi vacuum to open the rear barrels, the rear barrels will open earlier with a stock aircleaner, they will open later with a open aircleaner. This came to light when people started running the open aircleaners and found they were having a hard time getting the carb to open up(probably on the stock 4bbl carbs). The more restrictive stock aircleaner affects the pressure delivered to the diaphragm on the secondaries.
 
  #8  
Old 01-06-2017, 08:36 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
The sensor temps are shown here: Air Cleaners - ???Gary's Garagemahal. Most I've seen are 105 degree.
 
  #9  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:14 AM
kr98664's Avatar
kr98664
kr98664 is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,478
Received 692 Likes on 555 Posts
Interesting discussion. Concerning the snorkel to the grill, does the ram air effect make any noticeable performance improvement? Perhaps the logic for the snorkel isn't solely for temperature, but to also take advantage of the free ram effect.

On some light airplanes, the carb intake is ducted in a similar fashion. This setup is known as a poor man's supercharger.

I also think there is some advantage to the "restrictive" snout on the stock air cleaner assembly. Even though it would seem to reduce overall airflow, it increases the velocity entering the carb. Years ago I remember reading about dyno testing different air cleaners on a VW bug. Trimming the snout reduced torque at low RPM, if I remember correctly. It was quite the interesting read, but there's no way to find it again.

FWIW, the factory air cleaner on my '66 Corvair has two long and very narrow snouts. This is on the performance 4x1bbl engine. No snorkels, so it's still drawing air from the engine compartment. There must have been some advantage to the restrictive snouts or Chevrolet would have opened them way up. Perhaps it's a trade off for increased low RPM torque versus extra power at the top end.

Respectfully submitted.
 
  #10  
Old 01-06-2017, 10:23 AM
LARIAT 85's Avatar
LARIAT 85
LARIAT 85 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 3,362
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
That's assuming the snorkels are the restriction. I'm wondering if the larger diameter, but shorter, HO-style units are more or less restrictive than the taller standard units.
I don't *think* the standard units will fit over a four-barrel carburetor. I tried using a stock (2V) air cleaner on my 1985 model when I converted to a 4V carburetor and I seem to remember it wouldn't fit.


Originally Posted by 1986F150six
Restrictive is a relative term, Gary. Certainly, by going to the dual snorkles, your set-up will be less restrictive than original!
Right, and you also have to consider what specific air cleaner is on what specific engine. For example, Ford used the air cleaner designed for the 460 truck engine and adapted it to work on the 5.0 H.O. (302) engine found on the early 1980s Mustangs and the 5.8 H.O. (351) truck engines. If the 460 air cleaner flows enough for a 460 cubic inch engine, I find it hard to believe it would be restrictive on 351 cubic inch engine, or a 302 cubic inch engine - and with a second snorkel added.

I have read in several places that there is a 1% loss of horsepower for every 10 degree increase in temperature. So if the underhood temperature is 100 degrees higher than outside ambient air that could be inhaled in a cold air system, you would be down 10% in power.

Plus, a closed twin-snorkel air cleaner with the proper air ducts connected for cold air induction looks way cool - much cooler than the aftermarket chrome air cleaners everyone and their Mother-in-Law uses.


Originally Posted by kr98664
Perhaps the logic for the snorkel isn't solely for temperature, but to also take advantage of the free ram effect.

I also think there is some advantage to the "restrictive" snout on the stock air cleaner assembly. Even though it would seem to reduce overall airflow, it increases the velocity entering the carb.
Exact-a-mundo!
 
  #11  
Old 01-06-2017, 12:22 PM
WhatsAChevy?'s Avatar
WhatsAChevy?
WhatsAChevy? is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Northeast Ohio USA
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
When i purchased Blue Ox, she had an open air cleaner with a stand alone breather cap in the valve cover. During the winter months she was a very hard start presumably due to carb icing. During the summer she had a rough idle presumably due to not enough cooler outside air being fed in to the carb. I searched around and found a OEM air cleaner (1980 302 2v) with it's components and immediately swapped it out with a new filter element and internal breather element along with a new PCV valve. I also flushed the breather cap out four or five times with carb cleaner and replaced it's hose going to the housing with new neoprene. I did fabricate a new intake duct from the core (radiator) support to the snorkel from aluminum clothes dryer ducting. Being as how all emissions were stripped by the PO, her carb bowl vent is open.
By the end of summer here, she was starting with no issues with proper idle and just this morning being 5 degrees F, she fired up on the 4th crank and purrs. From my experience, open air cleaners may have their place but not on Blue Ox.....she doesn't like 'em.
What comes to mind is the Thunderbolt where the in-board high beam headlamps were removed and fresh air ducting installed to force feed cooler, fresh air.
 
  #12  
Old 01-06-2017, 01:53 PM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,630
Likes: 0
Received 1,680 Likes on 1,357 Posts
Carb icing doesn't cause hard starting. The carb will not ice up until there is airflow through it from the engine running. So the icing happens after the engine has run for a little bit.
 
  #13  
Old 01-06-2017, 02:42 PM
WhatsAChevy?'s Avatar
WhatsAChevy?
WhatsAChevy? is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Northeast Ohio USA
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Franklin2
Carb icing doesn't cause hard starting. The carb will not ice up until there is airflow through it from the engine running. So the icing happens after the engine has run for a little bit.
Guess I should have stated, hard start and poor idle in both hot and cold conditions.
Regardless, my point was.... in MY situation, the OEM air cleaner greatly improved both conditions.
 
  #14  
Old 01-06-2017, 04:51 PM
brad1979's Avatar
brad1979
brad1979 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I added a vacuum toggle switch to the vacuum line that runs to the temp switch in the air cleaner lid that controls the flap to the heat stove. That way I can warm the engine up with the heat stove and if it is warm out or I don't want the flap closing I can flip the switch and have it wide open. I do not have a stock engine and it likes the cold air from the grille. I had an open element and went back to the stock one with a K&N filter. It is not a race car and runs well with the stock air cleaner even if it does restrict flow, but I'm not totally convinced it does. I have heard various things in drag racing circles regarding air cleaners, specifically bases and lids. Apparently the curved or drop bases help smooth air flow into the carb better than flat bases. And I have heard of an engine that would not run properly with a K&N filter lid, apparently it messed up the air flow and a flat lid fixed it. I get the feeling air cleaners are sort of like hedders, it depends on a few factors whether there is much of a gain and is probably dependent on cam choice and engine size.
 
  #15  
Old 01-06-2017, 05:15 PM
84red's Avatar
84red
84red is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm, listening to all this technical talk is interesting, but just think, more colder air is better! I am about to also take two 460 air cleaners and make a dual snorkel. Using an efi air inlet for the driver side grille opening. Sort of like the 1968-1969 oldsmobile 442 w30, there were inlets underneath the bumper, then in 1970 they were relocated to the hood.
 


Quick Reply: Air Cleaners



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.