Notices
2017 - 2022 Super Duty The 2017-2022 Ford F250, F350, F450, F550 & F600 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Why no "Auto" function Transfer Case?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2016 | 09:42 PM
  #1  
BII Plow Truck's Avatar
BII Plow Truck
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 634
Likes: 2
Why no "Auto" function Transfer Case?

Would be nice to have a better transfer case, rather than just a straight up "Part-Time" unit. Basically a "Full-Time" (center differential) system for more on-road options with no driveline windup.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 06:19 AM
  #2  
troverman's Avatar
troverman
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,118
Likes: 650
From: NH
Originally Posted by BII Plow Truck
Would be nice to have a better transfer case, rather than just a straight up "Part-Time" unit. Basically a "Full-Time" (center differential) system for more on-road options with no driveline windup.
I agree, but the Ford "auto" option in the F-150 is not really full-time 4x4...more like the front wheels quickly engage when slip at the rears is detected.

Full-time 4x4 requiring a center diff would make the transfer case much bulkier and heavier, and would add cost to the truck. There would also need to be some method of controlling center diff slip - whether viscous coupling, multi-plat clutch, or manual lock. Pickup truck customers seem pretty content with part-time systems. Part time systems are also easier to make more durable.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
Rasalas's Avatar
Rasalas
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 4
From: Western New York
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by BII Plow Truck
Would be nice to have a better transfer case, rather than just a straight up "Part-Time" unit. Basically a "Full-Time" (center differential) system for more on-road options with no driveline windup.
The Ramcharger and Trailduster Chrysler offerings from 1971-79 both offered full time 4wd models. They featured the NP203 fulltime transfer case with a center differential. In spite of its heavier design for fulltime service the chains and sprockets would wear and eventually the chains would jump under even mild acceleration sending a heavy jolt throughout the vehicle. They were very expensive to rebuild and normal life was between 75K-100K miles. These models also featured an innovative front wheel bearing system which was also prone to failure. Two sides of a large cast iron sphere held the bearing which had to be shimmed to hold the race and the tapered rollers together and support the weight of the vehicle and keep the front camber correct. There used to be a lot of these running around with a "knock kneed" appearance since it was a trial and error method of shimming by disassembling and re-assembling the housing and a generally disliked and misunderstood repair. These repairs were best accomplished with a "For Sale" sign.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 07:45 AM
  #4  
ByersFarm's Avatar
ByersFarm
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Hunter
Originally Posted by Rasalas
The Ramcharger and Trailduster Chrysler offerings from 1971-79 both offered full time 4wd models. They featured the NP203 fulltime transfer case with a center differential. In spite of its heavier design for fulltime service the chains and sprockets would wear and eventually the chains would jump under even mild acceleration sending a heavy jolt throughout the vehicle. They were very expensive to rebuild and normal life was between 75K-100K miles. These models also featured an innovative front wheel bearing system which was also prone to failure. Two sides of a large cast iron sphere held the bearing which had to be shimmed to hold the race and the tapered rollers together and support the weight of the vehicle and keep the front camber correct. There used to be a lot of these running around with a "knock kneed" appearance since it was a trial and error method of shimming by disassembling and re-assembling the housing and a generally disliked and misunderstood repair. These repairs were best accomplished with a "For Sale" sign.
You beat me to it. The NP203 was a terrible unit in comparison to the 205.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 08:33 AM
  #5  
porthole's Avatar
porthole
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 63
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by BII Plow Truck
Would be nice to have a better transfer case, rather than just a straight up "Part-Time" unit. Basically a "Full-Time" (center differential) system for more on-road options with no driveline windup.

One word - economy.

As to the NP 203/205 - where you guys getting your info on the NP203 being junk?
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 08:35 AM
  #6  
porthole's Avatar
porthole
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 63
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Rasalas
The Ramcharger and Trailduster Chrysler offerings from 1971-79 both offered full time 4wd models. They featured the NP203 fulltime transfer case with a center differential. In spite of its heavier design for fulltime service the chains and sprockets would wear and eventually the chains would jump under even mild acceleration sending a heavy jolt throughout the vehicle. They were very expensive to rebuild and normal life was between 75K-100K miles. These models also featured an innovative front wheel bearing system which was also prone to failure. Two sides of a large cast iron sphere held the bearing which had to be shimmed to hold the race and the tapered rollers together and support the weight of the vehicle and keep the front camber correct. There used to be a lot of these running around with a "knock kneed" appearance since it was a trial and error method of shimming by disassembling and re-assembling the housing and a generally disliked and misunderstood repair. These repairs were best accomplished with a "For Sale" sign.
I guess all these deficiencies showed up after my 20 years working for a several of Dodge Chrysler Plymouth dealers.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 08:49 AM
  #7  
AZFordLover's Avatar
AZFordLover
Tuned
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 463
Likes: 86
On this topic, how does one optimally handle an up hill, unprotected left turn, across traffic, in slick (wet) conditions?

The light duties w/ a rear LSD and "4-Auto" can squirt across the street like a scalded cat but I'm concerned about how to do this in a much heavier Super Duty.

This might seem like a corner case but I run into it every day.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
Rasalas's Avatar
Rasalas
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 4
From: Western New York
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by porthole
One word - economy.

As to the NP 203/205 - where you guys getting your info on the NP203 being junk?
I did not say it was junk. I did say there was a common problem of chains and sprockets wearing and hence the tendency for the chain to jump on the sprocket prematurely to the life of the vehicle. I helped a friend change one out under 100K miles and another friend in a driveline shop said they were being brought in regularly for rebuild and often times replace after drivers failed to fix them in a timely manner after the chain started jumping. The whole system although a reasonable idea limited the trucks to 8-10mpg with the 360 engine. The 318 might have been a little better but there was a lot of iron to spin just to go straight down the road. And yes it was an inexpensive way for New Process Gear to create a full time 4WD.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:00 AM
  #9  
troverman's Avatar
troverman
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,118
Likes: 650
From: NH
Originally Posted by AZFordLover
On this topic, how does one optimally handle an up hill, unprotected left turn, across traffic, in slick (wet) conditions?

The light duties w/ a rear LSD and "4-Auto" can squirt across the street like a scalded cat but I'm concerned about how to do this in a much heavier Super Duty.

This might seem like a corner case but I run into it every day.
Sometimes I start in 4x4 and pull out straight to get moving, disengage 4x4, and then make the turn. The momentum carries me through. Works best with manual 4x4 shift, though, because you can disengage quicker.

Alternately, add weight. The truck will behave with much better.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:03 AM
  #10  
troverman's Avatar
troverman
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,118
Likes: 650
From: NH
Originally Posted by Rasalas
I did not say it was junk. I did say there was a common problem of chains and sprockets wearing and hence the tendency for the chain to jump on the sprocket prematurely to the life of the vehicle. I helped a friend change one out under 100K miles and another friend in a driveline shop said they were being brought in regularly for rebuild and often times replace after drivers failed to fix them in a timely manner after the chain started jumping. The whole system although a reasonable idea limited the trucks to 8-10mpg with the 360 engine. The 318 might have been a little better but there was a lot of iron to spin just to go straight down the road.
Land Rover ran full time cases for almost all of their models ever sold in the US. The permanent 4x4 Range Rover Classic used a center diff with a chain and viscous coupler unit...made by Borg Warner. Worked very well, but could fail after 100k miles. However, the Land Rover built case in the Discovery's and Defenders was gear-drive, 3.32:1 low range, and had a mechanical lock. Those were utterly indestructible and when my chain snapped on my '92 Range Rover, I replaced it with the Land Rover case from a Discovery.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:05 AM
  #11  
Rasalas's Avatar
Rasalas
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 4
From: Western New York
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by AZFordLover
On this topic, how does one optimally handle an up hill, unprotected left turn, across traffic, in slick (wet) conditions?

The light duties w/ a rear LSD and "4-Auto" can squirt across the street like a scalded cat but I'm concerned about how to do this in a much heavier Super Duty.

This might seem like a corner case but I run into it every day.
At least for me I do not own a heavy duty truck to drive it like a scalded cat. If I were to want that performance I would start with 300 pounds in the bed over the axle so the tires were not being ground off at every intersection.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:06 AM
  #12  
troverman's Avatar
troverman
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 10,118
Likes: 650
From: NH
One thing I prefer about part-time 4x4 is you get an idea about conditions and traction before you need 4WD. If you're sliding all over the place or aren't making it uphill very well, time to engage 4x4 and you are well aware of the slippery conditions. In the past, when I drove Land Rovers with permanent 4x4, you never really felt how slippery it was because they went so well, but that could lull you into taking a corner too fast or not leaving enough time for braking.

JMO
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:26 AM
  #13  
porthole's Avatar
porthole
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 63
Club FTE Silver Member

Originally Posted by Rasalas
I did not say it was junk. I did say there was a common problem of chains and sprockets wearing and hence the tendency for the chain to jump on the sprocket prematurely to the life of the vehicle. I helped a friend change one out under 100K miles and another friend in a driveline shop said they were being brought in regularly for rebuild and often times replace after drivers failed to fix them in a timely manner after the chain started jumping. The whole system although a reasonable idea limited the trucks to 8-10mpg with the 360 engine. The 318 might have been a little better but there was a lot of iron to spin just to go straight down the road. And yes it was an inexpensive way for New Process Gear to create a full time 4WD.
My purchased new 1978 Power Wagon, short bed 360 was a 12-14 MPG truck.

I would say my experience was probably limited to trucks under 100K. I specialized in engines and drive trains and although a did do a few of those 200 pound ,monsters I would say compared to the rest of the heavy repairs I did the ratio was relatively small.

Thinking back I would guess I did as many of the cast iron transfer cases that I did of the Dana 60 and 70 axles - very few.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:46 AM
  #14  
AZFordLover's Avatar
AZFordLover
Tuned
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 463
Likes: 86
Originally Posted by troverman
Sometimes I start in 4x4 and pull out straight to get moving, disengage 4x4, and then make the turn. The momentum carries me through. Works best with manual 4x4 shift, though, because you can disengage quicker.

Alternately, add weight. The truck will behave with much better.
Makes sense - thanks!
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2016 | 09:48 AM
  #15  
AZFordLover's Avatar
AZFordLover
Tuned
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 463
Likes: 86
Originally Posted by Rasalas
At least for me I do not own a heavy duty truck to drive it like a scalded cat. If I were to want that performance I would start with 300 pounds in the bed over the axle so the tires were not being ground off at every intersection.
For sure - use right tool for the job and all that. I'm just concerned about being quick across that unprotected left once a day.

Sounds like the extra bed weight should take care of the scenario for me.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE