When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well I DID use a one wire GM HEI distributor for my conversion (works GREAT!). I think these EFI to Carb conversions will be around for a LONG time, especially since you can't get a new computer for these old EFIs (I think). And I am so happy with this conversion because it doesn't randomly stall (SO DANGEROUS)! I just saw an ad for a 93 Jeep Cherokee that "starts, runs a bit, then stalls". I'm thinkin "Hmmm, I wonder if I could convert THAT one over?" I'm basking in the glow of this success ...
In my 3800s Thats 90% of the time a crank sensor easy peasy job
but not everything is powered by a pushrod 3.8l v6 that descends from a buick small block, sadly.
But I am in a similar boat in the future, my trucks wiring is degrading and the truck has way too many 1 year only parts.
the day it starts to become short to power city and NLA ripperoni you cant get that part anywhere nerd (self monologue) then the intake and distributor and a carburetor are going on and simple custom wiring where needed and an aftermarket E4OD controller.
In my 3800s Thats 90% of the time a crank sensor easy peasy job
but not everything is powered by a pushrod 3.8l v6 that descends from a buick small block, sadly.
But I am in a similar boat in the future, my trucks wiring is degrading and the truck has way too many 1 year only parts.
the day it starts to become short to power city and NLA ripperoni you cant get that part anywhere nerd (self monologue) then the intake and distributor and a carburetor are going on and simple custom wiring where needed and an aftermarket E4OD controller.
with that distributor, I would get your advance curved to your engine because the HEI aftermarket distributor has some basic generic *** weights probably for a V6 4.3l GM engine when you need and want a advance curve to match your engine. they sell kits and companies can help
especially since you can't get a new computer for these old EFIs (I think).
Rebuilt PCM's are very much readily available, that's not really a valid reason to go carb.
On a related note, I was sorta surprised to see a EEC-IV PCM on the '86 4.9 I recently saw at the junkyard. I guess even though they were carb, there was still an element of computer control going on - probably choke control and maybe even ignition mapping? I'd assume for anyone doing a carb swap the typical approach is to do away with that.
Rebuilt PCM's are very much readily available, that's not really a valid reason to go carb.
On a related note, I was sorta surprised to see a EEC-IV PCM on the '86 4.9 I recently saw at the junkyard. I guess even though they were carb, there was still an element of computer control going on - probably choke control and maybe even ignition mapping? I'd assume for anyone doing a carb swap the typical approach is to do away with that.
what year did EEC-III end? or did f series with 4.9 go to EEC-IV. I bet it had to do with the system being better than it did to be a special example. to my understanding eec-iii was a little bit of... no.
I DID put a rebuilt PCM on there, and still had the stalling trouble. When you stall, and you lose power steering while taking a left turn in front of bearing-down-traffic, then you will know. Also, the thing is now EMP proof (aside from the distributor module, of which I carry a spare in a Faraday cage).
Ive grenaded a transmission in that exact scenario just didnt stall but the car still jerked a little forward I was able to inefficiently keep moving but ive also had steering that checked out when it felt like and come back when it felt like
what year did EEC-III end? or did f series with 4.9 go to EEC-IV. I bet it had to do with the system being better than it did to be a special example. to my understanding eec-iii was a little bit of... no.
ALL of the 4.9 EFI trucks ('87+) are EEC-IV. I think even the last couple years of the carb'd 4.9 (circa '85/6) are EEC-IV. Obviously those would have a widely different strategy from the EFI trucks.
I DID put a rebuilt PCM on there, and still had the stalling trouble.
Then it's highly likely you had some other issue unrelated to the PCM. I'm not condemning you from going carb, just saying that PCM availability is not the reason to do so.
I've got a stack of five known-good PCM's here I can swap in as needed. I have found that the later ('94/'95) PCM's seem to have held up better with time. The worst offenders seem to be the ones from '90 - '93. I've got seven of those here all with failed capacitors. I keep saying I'm going to try my hand at soldering in new caps but haven't yet gotten to that project.
ALL of the 4.9 EFI trucks ('87+) are EEC-IV. I think even the last couple years of the carb'd 4.9 (circa '85/6) are EEC-IV. Obviously those would have a widely different strategy from the EFI trucks.
Excuse me, this aint plugged into the EEC-IV test connecotr LOL Its 96 4.9. i even wrote 4.9 on the accumulator thing
not EVERYTHING there are quite a few exceptions such as the 1997 F250 460 is eec-iv unless california trucks were eec-v(I dont think so) also there was EEC-IV uses from ford until 2002,2003 the latests Ive heard and 2004 was the final year it would be remotely possible in light duty vehicles
I DID put a rebuilt PCM on there, and still had the stalling trouble. When you stall, and you lose power steering while taking a left turn in front of bearing-down-traffic, then you will know. Also, the thing is now EMP proof (aside from the distributor module, of which I carry a spare in a Faraday cage).
Still offering strong props for doing your conversion the right way and also acknowledging that it was not necessarily a performance boost, but right now I'm thinking of all the times a carbureted engine has let me down at an inappropriate time. I will stick with EFI, thank you very much. By the way, you do know the enclosure of an EECIV ECM is a pretty effective Faraday cage?
This is gonna veer off topic, but my answer is "no, the metal casing around a typical EEC in NOT an effective Faraday cage because there are multiple feed-throughs that offer windows of opportunity for the pulse to penetrate, not to mention other holes in the casing". I encourage everyone interested to investigate how to make and test a Faraday cage, and THAT is the last I will say about it on this forum.
This is gonna veer off topic, but my answer is "no, the metal casing around a typical EEC in NOT an effective Faraday cage because there are multiple feed-throughs that offer windows of opportunity for the pulse to penetrate, not to mention other holes in the casing". I encourage everyone interested to investigate how to make and test a Faraday cage, and THAT is the last I will say about it on this forum.
nerd.
im saying that but its funny because im usually the nerd