1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

460 removal for 351W. Any pointers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-02-2016, 09:24 PM
skapford's Avatar
skapford
skapford is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NJ
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
460 removal for 351W. Any pointers?

I am pulling the 460 from my 1977.5 F250. Replacing with a 351W crate engine. Going to keep the NP205 transfer case and rebuild.

I came to my senses. Was bad decision. Live and you learn. On to the 460 upgrades!
 
  #2  
Old 03-16-2016, 08:01 AM
jbehuniak's Avatar
jbehuniak
jbehuniak is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
why get rid of the 460? is it a stick or C6?
 
  #3  
Old 03-16-2016, 10:05 AM
GLR's Avatar
GLR
GLR is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NY and VA
Posts: 49,407
Received 851 Likes on 769 Posts
Auto, can see the trans dipstick in the picture.
What is the reason for changing engines? Friend had a 79 460, C-6 2wd. Didn't like the gas mileage. Went to a 351W about the same gas mileage. Now to a 302, still about the same gas mileage.
 
  #4  
Old 03-16-2016, 11:53 AM
waituntilthebeep's Avatar
waituntilthebeep
waituntilthebeep is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GLR
Auto, can see the trans dipstick in the picture.
What is the reason for changing engines? Friend had a 79 460, C-6 2wd. Didn't like the gas mileage. Went to a 351W about the same gas mileage. Now to a 302, still about the same gas mileage.
Yeah... I don't think you could do much in the way of engine swaps to change fuel economy if that is the reason. My uncle did the same exact thing. He went up in sizes instead of down. Changed carbs, Changed ignition...points, Pertronix, etc, exhaust setups, gearing. Everything he did had some net gain or loss but no matter what he did, it really just boiled down to a mile or two a gallon and cost way more to do all this than he could ever gain in fuel mileage benefits. If you need economy, buy something more economical. A diesel for instance. Or a Prius I ran into this with my 74. The 390 geared the way it is gets me 8.5mpg dropped out of an airplane or towing a house. Nothing I do is going to fix that for the long run. I just drive it while my wallet chews a hole in my ***. My econ driver is a Goldwing that gets 42 mpg. Is what it is.
 
  #5  
Old 03-16-2016, 12:05 PM
rossterman's Avatar
rossterman
rossterman is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep the 460 and go with an overdrive unit
 
  #6  
Old 03-16-2016, 05:25 PM
jbehuniak's Avatar
jbehuniak
jbehuniak is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by GLR
Auto, can see the trans dipstick in the picture.
What is the reason for changing engines? Friend had a 79 460, C-6 2wd. Didn't like the gas mileage. Went to a 351W about the same gas mileage. Now to a 302, still about the same gas mileage.
Can't see pics on work computer. But good info
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mcfaddju032100
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
28
05-18-2019 06:52 PM
Luke76
Engine Swaps
5
09-02-2012 12:58 PM
1big79
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
28
12-06-2003 10:54 PM
superduty4x4
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
3
09-18-2003 01:19 AM
stover007
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
12
04-10-2003 02:18 AM



Quick Reply: 460 removal for 351W. Any pointers?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.