Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Jacobs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2002 | 01:21 PM
  #1  
Mike Lewis's Avatar
Mike Lewis
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Dickinson, TX
Jacobs


I installed a Jacobs RV Ultrateam kit into my '91 Ford F-150 yesterday, and notice that the truck has less low-end than it did before the install.

Has anyone else noticed this with the Jacobs kits? Mid range SEEMS better, but I can no longer accelerate, for instance, from 45-50 without the truck downshifting. Truck also loses speed and downshifts on a hill that I can otherwise take (lose speed, no downshift) with the kit disconnected (pulled fuse and reconnect stock coil-distributor wire.)

What's going on?!?!? Or is some loss of low-end normal?

I regapped the plugs to 0.064" as recommended by Jacobs (standard gap is 0.044").

Thanks,
-Mike
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2002 | 04:18 PM
  #2  
GammaDriver's Avatar
GammaDriver
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,017
Likes: 2
From: Southeast FLA
Jacobs

http://www.se-r.net/engine/ignition.html

there are some criticisms on that page, plus I was searching for a report on a mustang (i think) project car that they found some losses of torque (i think that's what it was - at some RPM level) on. I couldn't find it (but I did view the page within the last two months, so I bet it's still out there). But I did find a number of criticisms over Jacobs ignition claims and performance. It seems to be an over-rated CDI box... equal to other mid-level CDI boxes, but lacking the extra kick out of MSD's patented multiple sparks. But then a lot of people seem satisfied with Jacobs, too.

(here's a less-than informitive criticism of the ignition:
http://www.goingfaster.com/spo/gallery.html )

After all that searching and reading I just did, I'm a little more relieved I bought the MSD a month ago. Sorry if that sounds biased, but this was my first CDI purchase, so I'm a bit glad I came out ahead on the deal. I wanted the multiple sparks under 3500 RPM anyway because the I-6 isn't a high revving engine like the V-8's.

One post indicated a guy did bitch at Jacobs, with dyno sheets to prove that there was no improvement, but to no avail.

Have you checked your timing before and after installation?

 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2002 | 06:55 PM
  #3  
rondog's Avatar
rondog
Junior User
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Jacobs

Just a quick note. I put a Jacobs system in my '94 F-350 crew/dually (460/auto)and really didn't notice much difference. However, at about 1500 miles out of warranty, the Jacobs coil unit went bad. I replaced the spent unit with my stock unit (which I held on to) and disconnected the Jacobs computer and the truck ran fine till I sold the truck. Jacobs was no help, indicating that since the coil was out of warranty, there was nothing they could do... except sell me another one.

 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2002 | 05:24 PM
  #4  
mjb1962's Avatar
mjb1962
Senior User
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 482
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Jacobs

I tried Jacobs a few years ago. It was their top of the line "Ultra Team" and the system would not work as designed with the 302 V8 in my 89 F150. It caused a low to mid rpm misfire under load. Jacobs was no help in that all they could do was take the system back for a 10% restocking fee. What a RIPOFF! Buy an MSD system.
Mark
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #5  
F150xlt's Avatar
F150xlt
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 8
From: Baltimore
Jacobs

 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE