Notices
Excursion - King of SUVs 2000 - 2005 Ford Excursion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Quick question! ! Tire pressure towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 04:10 PM
  #31  
Krazee Matt's Avatar
Krazee Matt
Logistics Pro
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,595
Likes: 17
All I know is I set my pressures using the chalk line method until it wears evenly at operating temperature. I'm not plunking down $2500 on tires just to wear them suckers out prematurely by following a sticker.

A lot of good knowledge and information has been posted, as well as occasionally crammed down throats. Just goes to show that there's a wide expanse of knowledge and information here, as well as a ton of opinions and counter-opinions - as is the case with pretty much anything automotive related ever
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 05:45 PM
  #32  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
I've always gone by load-inflation tables when going above the specified GAWR. The only time I've ever been at 80 PSI was when the tires were loaded close to the max with almost 3,000 lbs additional weight on the rear axle. The fronts were at 45.

I've attached a table with most common sizes.
 
Attached Images
File Type: pdf
LoadInflationTable.pdf (1.31 MB, 55 views)
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 06:13 PM
  #33  
harley4jcs's Avatar
harley4jcs
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 1
From: Central Tx.
Originally Posted by Stewart_H
Let's not be hasty here. FTE doesn't have any rules against people disagreeing with each other. If we did, Brent woulda been gone a looooooooooooong time ago.

Pirate has been very personable and friendly when he posted his opinion on the issue, backing it up with facts he feels applies to the situation.

Let's not look to stifle anyone just because "we" feel a person is going against the grain of popular thought please, especially when Pirate is being very friendly in his posts and not coming across in a manner to flame or cause drama.

The above isn't directed at you Harley, I'm just using your post to illustrate my thoughts on this.

Thanks guys.

Stewart


I got it Stewart, HECK, I really get it, I prefer paddles over tows BUT the PSI preference had gone a little overboard IMHO. I wasn't trying to be a moderator, I'm just saying there is no point in beating a dead horse to death

PS: The above statements are not directed at you Michael
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 07:07 PM
  #34  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by WE3ZS
Does your door sticker really spec a Load Range E tire? Country Mouse's sticker calls for a Load Range D tire as shown in the photo she posted of it.
Would it not also be "dangerous" somehow to increase the Load Range above what the engineers originally called for? Wouldn't the heavier duty E tire have stiffer sidewalls than a D tire and thus different handling characteristics? I'm not trying to be a jerk, just honestly asking a question about how once a single thing gets changed from the original spec how big of an impact will it have in the big picture? I don't pretend to know that answer because I'm not an automotive engineer. Using tires as the example for how many variables there are let's look at the various treads available in a given load range and size. Not being an engineer I would think that there would be some serious differences between the handling, traction and braking performance among the various treads ranging between deep lug mud tires and rib style highway treads. But that isn't addressed on the door sticker. Should it be?
Good catch

I posted that last night at 1am. I was thinking load range D but typed load range E

here is my certification

I will try and answer your questions in coming post
 
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 08:06 PM
  #35  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by Stewart_H
Ah, you're one of "those" when it comes to tire pressure. No prob, it's all good.


Stewart

Actually I am more of a " get it correct" type but when it comes to dispensing advise I try and stick to facts that I can back up with a fairly high degree of certainty.

when it comes to tire pressure while piloting a 5 ton vehicle at 60 mph "see how it Feels and then tinker with it until you like it" is far to subjective of a guideline for me to accept. think about it for a minute, what if somebody took the advise and lost control and crashed ? what would I ask , So how did that feel ?

so lets dig into a more engineering approach to the question of tire pressure.

first of all i don't proclaim to be a tire expert nor an engineer, but I have been fortunate enough to have worked with several tire engineers from the major manufactures and have logged enough hours testing their products in an official capacity to respect their knowledge and recommendations.

A tires Load Carrying Capacity is dictated by heat and heat is controlled by the tires construction and air pressure.

the LCC or Load Carrying Capacity is a industry standard and all tires with the same LCC number will have the same maximum load carrying capacity. The LCC is a number between 0-150 and corresponds to a published weight

The Load Range is is sort of a carry over back from the day of bia ply tires but all tires of the same size and load range will also have the same LCC

example, all 265/75/16 E rated tires will have a maximum weight rating of 3415 pounds and a LCC of 123 @80psi (3420# )

Now, 3415 x 4 = 13,660 pounds however in the case of the excursion the GVWR is 10,000 so there is no need to use 80 psi if this is the tire you are running. can you ? YES. will it damage the tire ? No
will it negatively affect the way the vehicle handles ? YES


now I will interject with my subjective opinion. A common handling or mishandling characteristic of Higher then required air pressure is being squirrelly or wandering ( a familiar complaint amongst Excursion owners no ? )
this is caused by a reduction in the contact patch between the tire and the road. if the vehicle were heavier then the 10,000 GCVRW of the excursion it would squish the tire more and require more air pressure. a vehicle that weighs less then the tires max load will not squish the tire as much and require less air pressure to obtain the desired contact patch.

ok, that was longer then i wanted but i am trying to be as through as I can and still make this a brief summary.

more to follow
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 08:17 PM
  #36  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
lets move on ( feel free ask specific question and I will do my best to answer them or get the answer from a qualified source )


lets take 2 tires that you could run on an Excursion of a similar overall diameter but have a different construction

255/80/17 E 121 3195@80 psi
285/70/17 D 121 3195@65 PSI

just as a refresher my 2001 7.3 4x4 Excursion calls for the factor 265/75/16 D

3195 x 4 = 12,780

Lets apply this to the 10,000 GVWR

what pressure should we run ? 80 ? 65 ? or the 50/55 on the door certificate ?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 08:26 PM
  #37  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
I have a mathematical formula given to me on one of my many factor tire test sessions that can answer the question however I am reluctant to share it publicly.
I call the source of the formula today to find its origins and if it is the manufactures actual method or just an easy guideline that he shared with me.

So rather then possible lead people astray I went to Americas Tire today and asked some questions. it turns out the guy I spoke with doesn't have any idea what the formula is he just punches the numbers in the computer program and it spits out the sticker. But he did let me try out a few diffrent scenarios and I was able to confirm my equation ( at least on the samples I entered ) and he even printed out a new door psi sticker for my Excursion based on the vehicles GVRW and the tires LCC

My tires are a 37x12.5x17 D 123 and here is the PSI recommended
( it confers with my equation as well )
 
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 08:39 PM
  #38  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by pirate4x4_camo
lets move on ( feel free ask specific question and I will do my best to answer them or get the answer from a qualified source )


lets take 2 tires that you could run on an Excursion of a similar overall diameter but have a different construction

255/80/17 E 121 3195@80 psi
285/70/17 D 121 3195@65 PSI

just as a refresher my 2001 7.3 4x4 Excursion calls for the factor 265/75/16 D

3195 x 4 = 12,780

Lets apply this to the 10,000 GVWR

what pressure should we run ? 80 ? 65 ? or the 50/55 on the door certificate ?

So lets compare how you answered the question vs how the the computer program at Americas tire answered the question

the 255/80/17/E @ 50 front and 60 rear
the 285/70/17 D @ 50 front and 60 rear

So what if you are not operation at the GCWR of 10,000 pounds ?

The Americas Tire computer sez..... 50 front 55 rear

Since I just got home and have not had time to crunch any numbers I have not yet figured out what weight their non full loaded recommendation is based on but my HUNCH is curb weight.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-6

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
Old Dec 5, 2015 | 08:44 PM
  #39  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
My Apologies to Country Mouse for the lengthy reply to her " Quick Question "

My QUICK ANSWER is, stop by a Tire Shop ask them to calculate the needed PSI for you.

*Disclaimer
I have no affiliation with Americas Tire nor have I used them before. they were just the Shop I stopped in to get some answers.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2015 | 10:51 AM
  #40  
1 Excursion camper's Avatar
1 Excursion camper
Cargo Master
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 5
From: chicago northwest suburbs
I keep mine set at 75 frt and 80 rear. Seems to be the best setting.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2015 | 04:48 PM
  #41  
Country_Mouse's Avatar
Country_Mouse
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 949
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Wow, I didn't know this was so controversial!

I appreciate everyone's opinions. I was away for the weekend so it was hard to read through all of these responses. I will have to re-read the whole thread. I called BF Goodrich and they looked up the exact tire I have. Door jamb sticker says 45 front 55 rear for normal use since I have stock size tires. The E rating apparently doesn't change that.

They gave me a little chart. I would need to go to a scale to figure my exact weights on each axle so for now will just need to guess it. If I went by the RAWR in the rear of 5250# (5250/2= 2625 exactly) then that would equal no more than 55# in the rear tires which is what the sticker says. So I would have to be over that rating to justify adding more air. I understand many go over that rating anyways or swap out for heavier springs in order to meet the actual axle rating of 7K something.

Cold PSI weight rating per tire:

45= 2280#
50= 2470#
55= 2625#
60= 2790#
65= 3000#
70= 3105#
75= 3260#
80= 3415#
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2015 | 05:17 PM
  #42  
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 742
From: Isanti, MN
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Country_Mouse

They gave me a little chart. I would need to go to a scale to figure my exact weights on each axle so for now will just need to guess it. If I went by the RAWR in the rear of 5250# (5250/2= 2625 exactly) then that would equal no more than 55# in the rear tires which is what the sticker says. So I would have to be over that rating to justify adding more air. I understand many go over that rating anyways or swap out for heavier springs in order to meet the actual axle rating of 7K something.

Cold PSI weight rating per tire:

45= 2280#
50= 2470#
55= 2625#
60= 2790#
65= 3000#
70= 3105#
75= 3260#
80= 3415#
Those aren't manufacturer specific. Look towards the bottom of page A9 of the document I posted and you'll find the same information. Load-inflation tables are an industry standard.
 
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2015 | 06:57 PM
  #43  
mecdac's Avatar
mecdac
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 149
From: In the field...
Question

Ford Truck Enthusiasts User Gallery

An empty gallery.

PC show us some pics of your rig(s) towing with your Excursion in various conditions. Different trailers, WDH, whatever, show us your rig.

Hopefully you have some CAT scale weights to enlighten us. Or maybe not.

Pirate Camo scoffs (okay, scoff might be harsh "irresponsible" was the terminology) all who tow with more than 35 PSI...because he "knows better" and we are unsafe (allegedly).

In all of his "experience" drivers never asked for more 'traction'...'power'... etc. ?
 

Last edited by mecdac; Dec 7, 2015 at 07:08 PM. Reason: LOL
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2015 | 08:11 PM
  #44  
pirate4x4_camo's Avatar
pirate4x4_camo
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,259
Likes: 346
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by mecdac
Ford Truck Enthusiasts User Gallery

An empty gallery.

PC show us some pics of your rig(s) towing with your Excursion in various conditions. Different trailers, WDH, whatever, show us your rig.

Hopefully you have some CAT scale weights to enlighten us. Or maybe not.

Pirate Camo scoffs (okay, scoff might be harsh "irresponsible" was the terminology) all who tow with more than 35 PSI...because he "knows better" and we are unsafe (allegedly).

In all of his "experience" drivers never asked for more 'traction'...'power'... etc. ?
I tried to make it clear that the 35psi I listed applied to MY tire size and weight.
My "irresponsible" comment was referring to posting " I run xx psi " as a response to somebody asking what pressure they should run when the correct pressure for that persons setup will be dependent on their tire and weight and not what you run as you may have a completely different setup.

In all of my experience more traction and power is a common request.
 
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2015 | 06:55 AM
  #45  
1 Excursion camper's Avatar
1 Excursion camper
Cargo Master
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 5
From: chicago northwest suburbs
Originally Posted by pirate4x4_camo
I have a mathematical formula given to me on one of my many factor tire test sessions that can answer the question however I am reluctant to share it publicly.
I call the source of the formula today to find its origins and if it is the manufactures actual method or just an easy guideline that he shared with me.

So rather then possible lead people astray I went to Americas Tire today and asked some questions. it turns out the guy I spoke with doesn't have any idea what the formula is he just punches the numbers in the computer program and it spits out the sticker. But he did let me try out a few diffrent scenarios and I was able to confirm my equation ( at least on the samples I entered ) and he even printed out a new door psi sticker for my Excursion based on the vehicles GVRW and the tires LCC

My tires are a 37x12.5x17 D 123 and here is the PSI recommended
( it confers with my equation as well )

Even unloaded I wouldn't think of running 35psi in a D rated tire on an X! the X with a driver weighs 7500lbs (probably a few hundred more for a diesel). You got your info from a tire dealer that, and you said it yourself, he has no idea, just punches numbers in! for the best ride and from a safety standpoint those tires should be run at 55 psi (max for a "D" rated tire). just like the door sticker states.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.

story-0
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-02 21:45:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-5
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-6
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-9
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE