Notices
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Dentsides Ford Truck
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Diffs between 75 & 78-79 Steering links?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2015 | 08:04 PM
  #1  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Diffs between 75 & 78-79 Steering links?

I'm told the pitman arm, draglink, tie rod ends, etc. are superior with the 78-79 models. Can someone explain that?
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 12:55 PM
  #2  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
I'm told the pitman arm, draglink, tie rod ends, etc. are superior with the 78-79 models. Can someone explain that?
2WD or 4WD .. Regular Cab or Super Cab .. M/S or P/S .. Under 8,100 lbs. GVW?
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 01:47 PM
  #3  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
2WD or 4WD .. Regular Cab or Super Cab .. M/S or P/S .. Under 8,100 lbs. GVW?
Hello ND: The truck is regular cab with p/s, under 8,100 lbs, with dual piston calipers. 2x4
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 02:12 PM
  #4  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
Hello ND: The truck is regular cab with p/s, under 8,100 lbs, with dual piston calipers. 2x4
Draglink is the same 1973/79 F250 2WD except with 6,200 lbs. GVW with single piston caliper disc brakes.

Pitman Arm is the same 1973/79 F100/250 2WD Regular & Super Cab with P/S under 8,100 lbs. GVW / D2TZ-3590-B - Marked: D2TA-3590-BA

R & L tie rods same 1975/79 F250 2WD except with single piston caliper disc brakes.

There are no specific 1978/79 part numbers with any of these parts, so who you got this info from...had no clue!
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 03:04 PM
  #5  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Draglink is the same 1973/79 F250 2WD except with 6,200 lbs. GVW with single piston caliper disc brakes.

Pitman Arm is the same 1973/79 F100/250 2WD Regular & Super Cab with P/S under 8,100 lbs. GVW / D2TZ-3590-B - Marked: D2TA-3590-BA

R & L tie rods same 1975/79 F250 2WD except with single piston caliper disc brakes.

There are no specific 1978/79 part numbers with any of these parts, so who you got this info from...had no clue!
Thanks, ND, it is always good to confirm info gathered on the forum. Again, you kept me from lightening my wallet.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 04:26 PM
  #6  
tbear853's Avatar
tbear853
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,825
Likes: 2,609
From: The Shenandoah Valley
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
I'm told the pitman arm, draglink, tie rod ends, etc. are superior with the 78-79 models. Can someone explain that?
You may have heard or read something that was originally in reference to the hugely improved steering linkage design on a '78/'79 F150 4X4 versus the older '77 and back 4X4s.

If so .... it did not apply to 2X4 trucks.

Those 4X4s all used solid front axles which did not vary in length with suspension movement .... but up through 1977 Ford steered them with "inverted Y" style steering linkage that works great with twin I beams that have steering knuckles at the ends swinging through arcs because then distances between knuckles is not "fixed" at a certain distance, it's constantly moving in and out.

With a solid front axle, tie rod ends swing through arcs mean constant toe changes mean wandering trucks mean wearing tires .... in 1978 Ford made it rioght when they redid the steering linkage on the 4X4s.

But your's is a 2X4, that long straight tie rod setup will not work any better on your twin I beam setup than the old inverted Y setup will on a solid axle. That "inverted Y" setup will track as well as anything with twin I beam front suspension. As a part time (Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and other as needed) driver I probably put a hundred thousand miles on some several '70s model F-350s with the same basic set up with loads and lightly loaded hauling mail for a contract carrier back in the '70s on both US Rt 29 between Lynchburg & Danville, Va. and also on the back roads to the smaller post offices between and those trucks drive great when parts are in good shape.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...ring-swap.html
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 05:21 PM
  #7  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Thanks for the info. I believe you have explained it. I must say, though, I'm a bit disappointed. I've been through the entire steering and still end up with very tight bump steering, which feels like being a pen ball between bumpers when at speed. I have free play from about 2-3 minutes before the hour on the steering wheel, to about the same after the hour. I was hoping the later model linkage would solve my problems.

I believe I shall have to revisit my king pins--replaced 8 years ago.

Thanks for all the help.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 05:33 PM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
Thanks for the info. I believe you have explained it. I must say, though, I'm a bit disappointed. I've been through the entire steering and still end up with very tight bump steering, which feels like being a pin ball between bumpers when at speed. I have free play from about 2-3 minutes before the hour on the steering wheel, to about the same after the hour. I was hoping the later model linkage would solve my problems.

I believe I shall have to revisit my king pins--replaced 8 years ago.
1969/79 F100/250 2WD & F350 with Ford/Saginaw P/S as original:

The 3 bolts that retained the gearbox to the frame were too short, Ford didn't use locking nuts. The nuts backed off, the gearbox began to wiggle, the frame CRACKED!

Ford dealer fixum: Weld crack, weld sheet metal over crack, install longer grade 8 bolts and locking nuts.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-1

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-8

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 06:09 PM
  #9  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
1969/79 F100/250 2WD & F350 with Ford/Saginaw P/S as original:

The 3 bolts that retained the gearbox to the frame were too short, Ford didn't use locking nuts. The nuts backed off, the gearbox began to wiggle, the frame CRACKED!

Ford dealer fixum: Weld crack, weld sheet metal over crack, install longer grade 8 bolts and locking nuts.
Thanks for pointing that out, ND. Fixing that was my most recent project. I found holes enlarged, drilled them out to diameter of thick wall tubing, welded tubing in place, and used nice long grade 8 bolts with crimp nuts. It cut way down on free play, but left me with still tight bump steer that scares me at speed.



 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 06:29 PM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Bump steer, also known as brake judder. Step on the brake, the steering wheel shakes so bad, you can lose your grip.

The usual cause: Warped rotors. Turn the rotors, the blue heat spots disappear, but soon reappear, as once a rotor is warped, it's warped for life.

The only fix: Replace the rotors.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 07:11 PM
  #11  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Bump steer, also known as brake judder. Step on the brake, the steering wheel shakes so bad, you can lose your grip.

The usual cause: Warped rotors. Turn the rotors, the blue heat spots disappear, but soon reappear, as once a rotor is warped, it's warped for life.

The only fix: Replace the rotors.
Nope, that's not quite it. My issue happens w/o brakes being applied. I have free play in my steering wheel. If the circle of my steering wheel travel were a clock, between 2-3 minutes before noon, and 2-3 minutes after, I have free play.To control the vehicle I have to get the wheel to either point. Hence the term 'bump steer.' I am 'bumping the wheels right or left. Sometimes, if I bump too much, I rush back to the opposite side to bump back the other way, and while on the freeway I am bouncing or 'bumping' right/left/right like a pen ball between bumpers.

I believe the truck was less scary when I had a mile of free play in the steering. And about $1,000 more in my wallet from all the parts I have purchased trying to rid myself of the problem.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2015 | 07:45 PM
  #12  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by F-250 restorer
Nope, that's not quite it. My issue happens w/o brakes being applied. I have free play in my steering wheel. If the circle of my steering wheel travel were a clock, between 2-3 minutes before noon, and 2-3 minutes after, I have free play.To control the vehicle I have to get the wheel to either point. Hence the term 'bump steer.' I am 'bumping the wheels right or left. Sometimes, if I bump too much, I rush back to the opposite side to bump back the other way, and while on the freeway I am bouncing or 'bumping' right/left/right like a pen ball between bumpers.

I believe the truck was less scary when I had a mile of free play in the steering. And about $1,000 more in my wallet from all the parts I have purchased trying to rid myself of the problem.
Think of all the money you're saving by not making payments on a new truck!

Replace the steering gearbox with a rebuilt from redheadsteeringgears.com (Seattle WA).

The so-called auto parts store 'rebuilts' are nothing more than resealed gearboxes.

The Ford/Saginaw P/S gearbox has a flaw, there are no bearings on the sector shaft, it rides directly on the housing. Before too long, fluid begins leaking from the sector shaft seal.

Red Head takes the housing, machines it and installs the bearings that Ford omitted...on purpose, so they could sell a gazillion sector shaft seal kits.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2015 | 12:14 AM
  #13  
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
Thread Starter
|
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 384
From: Near Los Angeles
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
Think of all the money you're saving by not making payments on a new truck!

Replace the steering gearbox with a rebuilt from redheadsteeringgears.com (Seattle WA).

The so-called auto parts store 'rebuilts' are nothing more than resealed gearboxes.

The Ford/Saginaw P/S gearbox has a flaw, there are no bearings on the sector shaft, it rides directly on the housing. Before too long, fluid begins leaking from the sector shaft seal.

Red Head takes the housing, machines it and installs the bearings that Ford omitted...on purpose, so they could sell a gazillion sector shaft seal kits.
ND: Installing the Redhead box did eliminate quite a bit of the free play. The other things I rebuilt or replaced (bushings, column, rag joint, king pins, all linkages, etc) have reduced the play by bits. And still I am left with just enough to make it interesting and frustrating. There remains just enough to make it slightly dangerous.

Once the engine is out, it is time to take a long hard look at the cross member rivets (loose), and the part of the wheel/rotor mechanism that the ball tie rod ends mount in.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2015 | 08:03 AM
  #14  
77&79F250's Avatar
77&79F250
Moderator & parts slinger
Veteran: Army
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 50,235
Likes: 5,811
From: S/W Missouri, Polk county
Club FTE Gold Member
Steering column lower bearing replaced yet? And if it is a 1/2 ton, steering shaft rag joint, F250 the steering shaft might be the culprit? Borgson makes a nice set up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2015 | 08:43 AM
  #15  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 787
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 77&79F250
Steering column lower bearing replaced yet? And if it is a 1/2 ton, steering shaft rag joint, F250 the steering shaft might be the culprit? Borgson makes a nice set up.
OP (F-250 restorer) is working on a 1975 F250 2WD that does not have a lower steering shaft and coupler. Only 4WD's have it, so the OP won't have any need for a Borgeson shaft.

And, if you had read thru the OP's posts thoroughly, you would have seen he already replaced the rag joint (post 13)...which is D5TZ-3A525-A SAME: 1975/77 F100/150/250 2WD & F350 with P/S.

Worn lower bearing would not cause 'bump steer.'
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 PM.

story-0
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-3
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-5
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-7
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-9
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE