Safety ratings
Well, I read this article on the main page. I'm not going to dispute that safety has improved over the years. My first driving experience was in a 1956 M100 pickup. I have fond memories of that experience, but even my untrained eye can see that a more modern truck would be a much safer ride. Question is, where is the hard data that proves the newer trucks are significantly better? What can we, as consumers expect in terms of survivability in a crash and just how are those terms expressed?
A lot of improvement will be incremental. Is there any list that would show year over year improvements? Is a 2015 model that much better than a 2005? How about a 1995, or maybe a 1975 model? There will be a lot of factors that will be obvious, such as seat belts and collapsing steering columns. Note I did not mention airbags as I recall these were introduced as a response to failure to comply with seat belt usage. Softening the surfaces always helps, but we have introduced wear considerations that become prohibitively expensive to repair. Has this destroyed the ruggedness and utility of the truck?
I recall the 70's ad campaigns bragging that a high percentage of Ford trucks produced in previous decades remained on the job. Nowadays, it is rare to see something over 5 years old on the road. Insurance companies are quick to write off even minimally damaged vehicles and the repair shops are disappearing. Auto manufacturers are clamoring to control the repair of their product which only serves to strengthen their control over the life cycle. Computer controls were a godsend towards increased power and efficiency, now they are increasingly being used for surveillance to the benefit of the insurance industry. Is this all worth it? The auto industry wants to reach deeper into my pockets to make all this happen and I'm wondering if there are any tangible benefits for me?
they believe anything they read on the internet or hear in the news.
so if the car manufacturers tell them that cars are only safe for 5 years and they need to buy a new one every 5 years, that is what the sheeple are going to do because big brother knows best.
they believe anything they read on the internet or hear in the news.
so if the car manufacturers tell them that cars are only safe for 5 years and they need to buy a new one every 5 years, that is what the sheeple are going to do because big brother knows best.

Ford has supposedly demonstrated the aluminum F-150 is at least as strong its steel counterpart, still resisting that repair costs will rise though----denial?
http://m.nydailynews.com/autos/drive...icle-1.1088385
If Ford has the best rating and Dodge has the worst, just what is the point spread here? Exactly what danger do I face with the Dodge, (outside of ridicule from my fellow Ford fanatics?)
http://m.nydailynews.com/autos/drive...icle-1.1088385
If Ford has the best rating and Dodge has the worst, just what is the point spread here? Exactly what danger do I face with the Dodge, (outside of ridicule from my fellow Ford fanatics?)
There are two other links the 2015 forum that of interest as well. Come visit us.











