Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Testing fuel pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 10:03 AM
  #16  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by kirkharrod
They eventually leak and stop working. Sometimes they kind of melt/deform. Always covered by warranty but a hassle. I have a plug in the glovebox. The thing is, my sender is in a port in the head, because I have deleted the fuel bowl. So its a more inconvenient to remove.
I'm in a similar situation, the first electrical sending unit failed after a couple of years in the F-250. It would read low and bounce while the mechanical under the hood gauge stayed steady at 63. Replaced that one and has been good the last 5-6 months. Spot on at 63 psi.

The same setup in the Excursion just failed after about 15 months. Electrical in-cab gauge reads 80-85 psi while the mechanical under the hood gauge reads 65.

In both vehicles the sending units are in the fuel bowl.

Kirkharrod - any idea how long the warranty is good for?
 
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 10:28 AM
  #17  
F250_'s Avatar
F250_
Hotshot
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Liked
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 11,286
Likes: 263
From: North of Greenville
I'm not a fan of tubing up fuel lines all over the place, but for those of you who are experiencing multiple failures, would it be worth considering running either a small diameter hard tube or SS flex line over to an open location on the fender wall under the hood, and re-mount the sender there with a shutoff valve for easy access and isolation in the event of any future leaks/failures?

Just a thought.

I do know from experience that an under the hood gauge gives you no troubleshooting opportunity except at idle conditions with the hood open (unless you want to also mount a lighted monitoring camera under the hood as well so you can see the camera display in the cab, but that seems like overkill to me).
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 03:55 PM
  #18  
trekbasso's Avatar
trekbasso
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 9
From: Wellington, Co
Sorry I am just now catching this. I have had GS for 3 years. Sensor started acting up late last year, got a new one, and mounted remotely with a GS kit. Nice steel braided line. Works great, should work with any under hood sensor. Supposed to dampen vibration which kills sensors mounted on the engine. My sensor gets pressure from the pre filter side of the bowl.


Which is why I was searching. Just installed FRX, with gold spring, supposed to be 62-65 psi. Getting consistent 70-75. How much psi difference is there/should there be between pre filter side and post filter side of bowl?


Thanks.
Tom.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 06:25 PM
  #19  
Thomas White's Avatar
Thomas White
Elder User
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 588
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by trekbasso
Just installed FRX, with gold spring, supposed to be 62-65 psi. Getting consistent 70-75. How much psi difference is there/should there be between pre filter side and post filter side of bowl?
The pressure difference would be the amount of restriction: Difference = Filter Material and Amount + Debris.

So, the pressure would be less as the filter material becomes contaminated with debris.

The only real way to know is to use a mechanical gauge and check both the supply side and the return side without disturbing the filter.

The actual pressure used by the Injectors via the rail is more like 35 psig at the injector. This number increases with a clean filter and decreases as it becomes contaminated.

While the "Gold Spring" should maintain a given pressure, several things affect the actual pressure. I would think you would receive the same answer from the manufacturer.

70-75 is right at the top limit for the OEM System. So long as the residual measurement does not fall below 42 psig. I would just drive it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 10:39 PM
  #20  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
On my Excursion the the mechanical fuel pressure gauge on the regulated return shows 63 psi, and the in cab electrical fuel pressure gauge installed on the top passenger side port of the fuel bowl shows 66-67 psi. So I have a 3-4 psi difference between pre & post filter on this setup.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 10:44 PM
  #21  
white Buffalo's Avatar
white Buffalo
Post Fiend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,426
Likes: 6
From: Sioux Falls, SD
when my fuel filter was getting clogged I watched the in cab fuel pressure gauge climb to 70-75 psi. I never had this situation happen before so I assumed it was my electrical gauge sending unit malfunctioning. ISSPRO sent me another sending unit but it read the same - I was wrong, it was my fuel filter getting dirty. Put in a new fuel filter and I was good to go! I must have got some crappy fuel along the way somewhere -..................
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2015 | 11:32 PM
  #22  
scotttahoe's Avatar
scotttahoe
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 2
From: North Lake Tahoe
My Isspro sending unit was on its way out just before I pulled the motor, installed it in 2012. I called Isspro and talked with Mike (good dude, just busy and hard to get a hold of sometimes) He replaced my sensor and also gave me a snubber to help with vibration issues. Will see how well it works soon I hope. I do like the idea of moving the sensor to the fender with a braided line though. Might be something I need to do.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2015 | 12:29 PM
  #23  
trekbasso's Avatar
trekbasso
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 9
From: Wellington, Co
Thanks all. Just got a reply back from Bob (Orings guy), should not have over 70. Check with a mechanical, maybe try stock spring. I did put a new filter in it at the time.
Might be a week or so before I feel like diving in again.
Will post results.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 4, 2015 | 10:09 AM
  #24  
trekbasso's Avatar
trekbasso
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 9
From: Wellington, Co
Dug out my Snap On mechanical gauge, hooked up to the line where my sending unit gets pressure, 65 at idle. I am calling electrical off by about 10%. As long as things stay consistent I am okay with it.


Thanks for the replies. I always learn something.


Tom.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brian Ski 44
Fuel Injection, Carburetion & Fuel System
4
May 29, 2016 10:56 AM
presidentsdad
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Dec 7, 2014 10:48 AM
Two_Ton21
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Feb 4, 2014 07:52 PM
cdiddy
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
20
Jan 16, 2008 02:14 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE