Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

351w vs 360/390

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-08-2014, 04:59 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
351w vs 360/390

I'm building a new motor for my truck and I probably will build the 351w up but I wanted to hear your opinions on both of them since one being a small block and the other a big block.. is a 360 or 390 gonna kill me for gas mileage? How much more than the 351? Power differences? Which one do you thunk is better? Also the year of the 351 is an 83 and the 360/390 I have a 360 that is a 1969 out of an f350 and the other motor as it is not mine just yet is an early to mid 70s motor I believe.. it's out of an f250
 
  #2  
Old 12-08-2014, 05:15 PM
NotEnoughTrucks2014's Avatar
NotEnoughTrucks2014
NotEnoughTrucks2014 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 1,885
Received 99 Likes on 73 Posts
This should help.

http://www.mustangsandmore.com/ubb/E...imensions.html

For what it's worth, I'm pretty sure you could make close to the same horsepower out of either engine, but the Windsor would be much cheaper.

A friend built a 390 for his 69 Mustang several years ago and he had a heck of a time finding a good block. Cylinder wall cracking seemed to be the problem.

I don't recall anybody saying anything kind about fuel mileage with the 360 in early pickups.
 
  #3  
Old 12-08-2014, 06:50 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,600
Received 1,173 Likes on 927 Posts
Not to mention those 360/390 engines will not bolt to your existing transmission. The you have to figure out the belt drive system to run the power steering, alternator, A/C if you have it. Way more trouble than it's worth. I am a fan of the Ford 390 FE engine. I would not take a 360 even if someone gave it to me.
 
  #4  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:28 PM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The FE is a hard fit into the 80-96 era trucks, so expect a lot of work to shoehorn one in.

Stroke the 351w and leave the FE stuff to the older trucks.
 
  #5  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:38 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rla2005
Not to mention those 360/390 engines will not bolt to your existing transmission. The you have to figure out the belt drive system to run the power steering, alternator, A/C if you have it. Way more trouble than it's worth. I am a fan of the Ford 390 FE engine. I would not take a 360 even if someone gave it to me.
How come u wouldn't take a 360? I got one in the farm truck and I think it's real good not including gas mileage
 
  #6  
Old 12-08-2014, 07:39 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by f100beatertruck
The FE is a hard fit into the 80-96 era trucks, so expect a lot of work to shoehorn one in.

Stroke the 351w and leave the FE stuff to the older trucks.
How much would stroking the 351w cost?
 
  #7  
Old 12-08-2014, 08:56 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,600
Received 1,173 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by steve33444
How come u wouldn't take a 360? I got one in the farm truck and I think it's real good not including gas mileage
I just never liked that bore/stroke combination in a few different trucks I have driven over the years. The 360 I had in my old 1976 F350 dump truck was gutless for the gas mileage I got out of. Yes I know...it was a dump truck.

A good friend used to have a 1976 F150 with a 360 that was a dog so we dropped in a 390. It completely changed that truck's character.
 
  #8  
Old 12-08-2014, 08:57 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is online now
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,600
Received 1,173 Likes on 927 Posts
Originally Posted by steve33444
How much would stroking the 351w cost?
Ford Engine Kit - Ford 351 Stroker Kit, 351 Windsor, 383, 393, 408, 418, 427, 454, Stroker
 
  #9  
Old 12-08-2014, 10:28 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rla2005
I just never liked that bore/stroke combination in a few different trucks I have driven over the years. The 360 I had in my old 1976 F350 dump truck was gutless for the gas mileage I got out of. Yes I know...it was a dump truck.

A good friend used to have a 1976 F150 with a 360 that was a dog so we dropped in a 390. It completely changed that truck's character.
Hmmm... that's interesting cause the 360 I have is in a 69 f35p dump truck and it spins the dual tires so it definitely don't feel gutless to me haha
 
  #10  
Old 12-08-2014, 10:32 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good god that's expensive... and I only looked at the 357 so far... I'll either be saving money for a long while or just not stroking it
 
  #11  
Old 12-09-2014, 05:30 AM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
For me the only difference was the price of the crank, which at the time was a little over $250. Now I think they're a little over $300 for an Eagle crank. Pistons are 302 pistons vs 351w. They're just KB hyper eutectic pistons, nothing fancy. I think my whole shortblock was around $2,200 with balancing, assembled. A plane Jane factory rebuild was like $1,600 but had cast pistons and no balance. What you're looking at is complete rotating assemblies with rods, pistons and rings and bearings. Forged pistons will be more and the 408, etc, kits will be more. The 357 and 393 kits use more common pistons, the 393 kit using the 302 pistons. Stroke is 3.850.

I don't have mine in the truck yet. I didn't have anywhere to work on the truck till now, but I'm still not fully moved in. I'm hoping to get it going this spring/summer. I can say the machine shop said it balanced up real nice.
 
  #12  
Old 12-09-2014, 05:48 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 651 Likes on 546 Posts
Originally Posted by rla2005
Not to mention those 360/390 engines will not bolt to your existing transmission. The you have to figure out the belt drive system to run the power steering, alternator, A/C if you have it. Way more trouble than it's worth. I am a fan of the Ford 390 FE engine.

I would not take a 360 even if someone gave it to me.
1968/76 F100/350 360/390: The block and heads are the same as is the bore (4.05"), the stroke is different. 360: 3.50" - 390: 3.78."

So, all one needs to do to convert a 360 to a 390, is by installing the 390's crank, rods and pistons.
 
  #13  
Old 12-09-2014, 06:25 AM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by f100beatertruck
For me the only difference was the price of the crank, which at the time was a little over $250. Now I think they're a little over $300 for an Eagle crank. Pistons are 302 pistons vs 351w. They're just KB hyper eutectic pistons, nothing fancy. I think my whole shortblock was around $2,200 with balancing, assembled. A plane Jane factory rebuild was like $1,600 but had cast pistons and no balance. What you're looking at is complete rotating assemblies with rods, pistons and rings and bearings. Forged pistons will be more and the 408, etc, kits will be more. The 357 and 393 kits use more common pistons, the 393 kit using the 302 pistons. Stroke is 3.850.

I don't have mine in the truck yet. I didn't have anywhere to work on the truck till now, but I'm still not fully moved in. I'm hoping to get it going this spring/summer. I can say the machine shop said it balanced up real nice.
That's good. So the 393 is probably the best way to go if I stroke it?
 
  #14  
Old 12-09-2014, 11:46 AM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by steve33444
That's good. So the 393 is probably the best way to go if I stroke it?
For me it seemed like the better way to go. I only needed a cast crank and hyper eutectic pistons so the prices were much better than the 408 kits. Now when you add forged pistons the prices get closer and if you add a forged crank it's really not that different, but for an inexpensive stroker the 393 seems like the hot ticket. Just watch your compression ratio. Summit Racing has a calculator. I went with around 9.5:1, but I'm trying to build kind of a hot motor. For more of a street motor you might want to go around 9:1 - 9.25:1
 
  #15  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:05 PM
bbf385's Avatar
bbf385
bbf385 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by f100beatertruck
The FE is a hard fit into the 80-96 era trucks, so expect a lot of work to shoehorn one in.
A 460 is a bigger engine and came stock in 80-96/7 trucks. It fits with room to spare, so I'd wager a 390 would fit no problem.
I'd go with a 460, though. A BB in a truck =
 


Quick Reply: 351w vs 360/390



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 PM.