cam selection
#1
cam selection
rebuilding my 93 F-150 4x4, auto with 5.8, hydraulic cam engine 33in tires, 3:55 gears, adding headers, good exhaust with converter, cold air intake, maybe a computer upgrade if i can find one, and this is a speed density system. seems to be alot of contriversy on cam selection, i've narrowed it down to 2 cams but if any one has a better choice feel free to suggest. the most popular grind specs are as follows
<table summary="" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="1"><tbody><tr><td>Intake / Exhaust</td> <td>204/214</td> </tr> <tr> <td>*.050 Intake / Exhaust</td> <td>.448/.472</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lobe Sep.</td> <td>112</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Firing Order</td> <td>351W
</td></tr></tbody></table>
i would like to run the following grind if it would work with little or no additional upgrades
Cam Lift (Int./Exh.):.295/.310
Valve Lift (Int./Exh.):.474/.498
.050" Duration (Int./Exh.): 214/224
C/L Angle: 112
i'm trying to get the largest cam that will work with a basicly stock engine, .020 over bored, stock speed density f/i system, truck is a daily driver, tows about 4000 lbs of lawn equipment and trailer 3 times a week and needs to pass emissions. i know if not sure a smaller grind is safer but i'm trying to get this at it best the first time. any help appreciated.
<table summary="" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="1"><tbody><tr><td>Intake / Exhaust</td> <td>204/214</td> </tr> <tr> <td>*.050 Intake / Exhaust</td> <td>.448/.472</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lobe Sep.</td> <td>112</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Firing Order</td> <td>351W
</td></tr></tbody></table>
i would like to run the following grind if it would work with little or no additional upgrades
Cam Lift (Int./Exh.):.295/.310
Valve Lift (Int./Exh.):.474/.498
.050" Duration (Int./Exh.): 214/224
C/L Angle: 112
i'm trying to get the largest cam that will work with a basicly stock engine, .020 over bored, stock speed density f/i system, truck is a daily driver, tows about 4000 lbs of lawn equipment and trailer 3 times a week and needs to pass emissions. i know if not sure a smaller grind is safer but i'm trying to get this at it best the first time. any help appreciated.
#3
my mistake, the smaller cam has a 114 lobe separation, so i guess the lobe separation being higher is more important as long as the lift and duration is kept reasonable, would one of these grinds work better
Valve Lift (Int./Exh.):.474/.498
.050" Duration (Int./Exh.): 214/224
C/L Angle: 114
or
Valve Lift (Int./Exh.):.478/.485
.050" Duration (Int./Exh.): 214/224
C/L Angle: 114
their almost the same exept the lift
Valve Lift (Int./Exh.):.474/.498
.050" Duration (Int./Exh.): 214/224
C/L Angle: 114
or
Valve Lift (Int./Exh.):.478/.485
.050" Duration (Int./Exh.): 214/224
C/L Angle: 114
their almost the same exept the lift
#6
thanks for the info Conanski, thats what i needed to learn about, i'm old school, give my a carburetor engine with a simple distributor and no computer and i can make it sing, kinda dating myself here, finding out that computer control is a whole other animal. so would a grind like this work ok.
<table summary="" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="1"><tbody><tr><td>Intake / Exhaust *.050 </td> <td>204/214</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Intake / Exhaust</td> <td>.448/.472</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lobe Sep.</td> <td>114</td></tr></tbody></table>
or should i reduce the duration a little more? it HAS to pass emissions unfortunately i'm in a county surrounded by counties with emission standards, the truck was passing very clean i might add with one cylinder at 60 lbs and so much blow by oil dripped from the air box, way past time for a rebuild.
<table summary="" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" border="1"><tbody><tr><td>Intake / Exhaust *.050 </td> <td>204/214</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Intake / Exhaust</td> <td>.448/.472</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Lobe Sep.</td> <td>114</td></tr></tbody></table>
or should i reduce the duration a little more? it HAS to pass emissions unfortunately i'm in a county surrounded by counties with emission standards, the truck was passing very clean i might add with one cylinder at 60 lbs and so much blow by oil dripped from the air box, way past time for a rebuild.
#7
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 968 Likes
on
765 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#11
#13
#15
Right now it has true 2.5 duals but if I put gt40 heads on I'll prolly put a set of headers on too. This is also a speed density motor