When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What's your problem hydraulic clutches? They're really not that much more complicated and if you use a modern engine it won't have the mounting point for the mechanical clutch so....
Don't have a problem with Hyd clutch, just would be easier to fabricate a cable attachment to my exsiting clutch pedal instead of trying to find a place to mount a master cylinder.
I do plan on changing the rearend. It currently has the orginal Dana 41. That is not a typo 41 not 44. I plan pulling a 8.8 out of something with the approximate same width. I will have to do some measuring to see what fits nicely under the F1 body(or you guys may have some ideas). So... A 300 6cyl Carb or Injected (TBD), 5 speed Tremac and a 8.8 with 3:50ish gear. 18mpg??? or not.
if you are able to get the complete truck the engine and trans are in, i would use as much as you can. the rear should bolt in to the panel, same with the front axle. this will give you 4 wheel drive too. the 300 most likely has a ZF 5 speed trans and a BW 1356 tansfer case.
as it sits, i bet that combo should get you close to 18 mpg or so even with 4.10 gears.
If you target a highway engine speed of 1800-1900 rpm and keep that speed to 70mph or less mid to high teens fuel milage is possible, and you will get more city friendly gear ratios with a transmission that has an overdrive.
Both the I6 and V8 motors are capable of delivering this too, my 5000lb ext cab 4x4 exceeds 18mpg US at a steady 70mph over relatively flat terrain.
I am not a huge fan of 4wd. I just sold a 1995 f150 4wd with a 4.9 and 5speed. She had almost 300,000 miles on her and the guy has drove it all winter. I live on the main road and run a 4 lane to work everyday. We have some snow up here, but I rarely would need 4wd. I just can't see the maintainence issues of 4wd when I really only need 2wd. Good snow tires and a little weight over the rear axle and there are not many places I can't go. The gas mileage on the 4wd I sold was 16 highway 13 around town. That is the reason I was thinking fuel injected is the way to go. If I was to pull the 4wd stuff out of that 1995, I know I would have got 18 maybe 20.
If I was to pull the 4wd stuff out of that 1995, I know I would have got 18 maybe 20.
No.. that's a common misconception about these trucks, it wouldn't make any difference unless you were driving around with the front hubs locked all the time. When they're unlocked and the t-case is in 2wd all that drivetrain is stationary and adds no additional load on the motor.
I see the point with 4wd unlocked, but still got more junk to go wrong. Also my 95 was ext cab and a 8 foot box. So the question of weight in comparison to the Panel truck, I would guess pretty close to the same. So let me get it straight. The Fox bodied Mustang 5speed has no hydraulic actuaters at all? The cable doesn't go to a slave down on the tranny? If so then I think that is the tranny I want. Next question Single Barrel Carb (easy) or fuel injected(not so easy) Trying to get the 18mpg.
I see the point with 4wd unlocked, but still got more junk to go wrong. Also my 95 was ext cab and a 8 foot box. So the question of weight in comparison to the Panel truck, I would guess pretty close to the same. So let me get it straight. The Fox bodied Mustang 5speed has no hydraulic actuaters at all? The cable doesn't go to a slave down on the tranny? If so then I think that is the tranny I want. Next question Single Barrel Carb (easy) or fuel injected(not so easy) Trying to get the 18mpg.
The Mustang up to 2004 had a cable operated clutch. 94+ cars had electronic speedometer adapters.
Use a Ford OEM cable if possible to fit it in your truck. The aftermarket cables tend to stretch and break, especially the aftermarket adjustable ones.
No hydraulics at all, cable runs from clutch pedal, through firewall, then down and directly attaches to the fork. EFI is not a very difficult matter at all from a truck this generation but parts could be costly. EFI's make decent mileage, with a carb it's all in the tuning. I've worked with 300's and 302's with both setups and I could make slightly better mileage with carbs on both. 1bbl for a 300 or 2bbl with 302.
Ok made my decision. 300cid 1 barrel Carb, T-5 and maybe a little taller that 3:5 gears. I know the 300 and 302(5.0) have the same bell housing bolt pattern. Will the pilot bearing in the 300 work with the T-5? I will buy a clutch/pressure palte/throwout bearing that fits the T-5. I will also get an aftermarket clutch cable. Anything else you can think of?