When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The thinner frames will certainly be more than rugged enough for the weekend warrior like myself to haul lumber, mulch, topsoil, etc.
I see a great deal of animosity brewing when a person bought a truck expecting to be able to pull an RV and is told by the RV dealer that his truck isn't rated.
I worry that an equal amount of corrosion (salt, water spray, etc) will have a greater impact on a thinner frame. If every millimeter is expected to work harder, what have you lost when it starts to rust away?
I worry that an equal amount of corrosion (salt, water spray, etc) will have a greater impact on a thinner frame. If every millimeter is expected to work harder, what have you lost when it starts to rust away?
There are products that can be applied to keep that at bay. However you will need to stay on top of that. And I'm sure Ford has taken that into consideration when designing the new frame as well. As of right now Ford offer I believe it's a 5 year/100,000 mile corrosion warranty. I can only see that being extended on the new trucks. But that's my opinion. We'll just have to wait an see.
Thats good info but I have yet to see a 6.2 in XLT Trim. You usually have to buy a Lariat or above. Who the heck is gonna use a Lariat as a plow truck? LOL
Me! But it's my F550 Lariat with a 9' Boss straight blade.
Aluminum has been used for years and I don't think that's the real issue here.
As for frame thickness, the article alludes that in order to get a truck rated to tow, you must purchase a truck with a heavier frame.
It's not like now where you option a truck for max tow, otherwise you have a standard rated truck but nothing is different in the frame.
The thinner frames will certainly be more than rugged enough for the weekend warrior like myself to haul lumber, mulch, topsoil, etc.
I see a great deal of animosity brewing when a person bought a truck expecting to be able to pull an RV and is told by the RV dealer that his truck isn't rated.
I know I'm way late in this discussion but, Aluminum has been used for quite some time now, maybe not here, definetly overseas. Insurance premiums haven't "skyrocketed", vehicles are still getting 5* crash ratings, so safety isn't an issue. My thoughts are, no one likes change. With every "new generation" F-150, we've seen this. I'm sure we can all remember the '97 series hitting the showroom, that was one of the most radical changes up to that date, people initially hated it, but snatched them up still the same...We can speculate / debate forever, but let's give it a chance at the very least.
Like any new model year design, I'll wait for the 2nd or 3rd year into the model before thinking of buying something as tempting as it is to be the first kid on the block to have one. The first year production is where most of the bugs are found and worked on. By the 2nd and 3rd years, the bug list is pretty clean.
That said, I'm sure the others will follow suit in using more aluminum in their trucks as well.
I wouldn't be surprised if a compacted graphite engine block is in the queue also... the SD's use them now and are a huge weight savings.
Regarding insurance, it's interesting the my insurance rates on my F150 and F350 are exactly identical and cost less than my wife's older Lexus. You'd think I can cause much more damage with an empty F350 that weighs 8200lbs. Not sure what the deal is, but I'm not complaining. But like an earlier post notes... a few more pounds of metal is cheaper than a few broken bones.
Regarding insurance, it's interesting the my insurance rates on my F150 and F350 are exactly identical and cost less than my wife's older Lexus. You'd think I can cause much more damage with an empty F350 that weighs 8200lbs. Not sure what the deal is, but I'm not complaining. But like an earlier post notes... a few more pounds of metal is cheaper than a few broken bones.
Insurance companies have so many variables when rating a vehicle, some more asinine than others. You would think size, weight, speed, etc would be most of the equation but, they look at the number of thefts, cost of repair, vehicle color, and the list goes on and on.....regardless, it's always, "too mucking futch"!!!
Going back to the OP's intent, Ford was experiencing some problems. These problems aren't likely to find their way to the public as Ford has been using aluminum in the F-150's and Expeditions for well over 10 years now.
On my '05 F150, they touted about and used aluminum control arms. It seems the more recent F150s went back to using steel???? because it's cheaper????
Originally Posted by tseekins
Going back to the OP's intent, Ford was experiencing some problems. These problems aren't likely to find their way to the public as Ford has been using aluminum in the F-150's and Expeditions for well over 10 years now.
HMMM, I have a sneaky feeling that these full aluminum bodies will last in production for only a few years.
Aluminum is fine in much lower volume vehicles but, this is the mass volume F150. I think Ford got a little ahead of themselves.
Not only that but in the coming elections, people who understand how the real world works will start taking the CAFE out of bizzaro-la-la land and set the standards back several notches. They will no longer need to make soda can trucks.
I think F150 buyer for the next few years will have themselves a collectors items on their hands after 2017-18. Time will tell.
I'm ready for a new one. And I really hate to say this but I think I'm buying the 2500 series Dodge with the Cummins turbodiesel . Another thing we had the body off my 2012 F150 for some repairs I can't believe how much flex is in this frame, it's not solid at all. they're only going to get worse. Mark my words "Dodge is going to use this opportunity to steal real truck enthusiast from Ford". GM is already doing a good job of it.
This is true, its going to be a heated race for quite a few years to come. However, I disagree with your GM statement. RAM is the real player now, GM is an also ran and losing market share. Just watch it over the new few years.
HMMM, I have a sneaky feeling that these full aluminum bodies will last in production for only a few years.
Aluminum is fine in much lower volume vehicles but, this is the mass volume F150. I think Ford got a little ahead of themselves.
Not only that but in the coming elections, people who understand how the real world works will start taking the CAFE out of bizzaro-la-la land and set the standards back several notches. They will no longer need to make soda can trucks.
I think F150 buyer for the next few years will have themselves a collectors items on their hands after 2017-18. Time will tell.
Really you think so huh? Well if that is the case then why did GM recently announce that their next gen truck will have an aluminum body? The next F150 is in many ways going to be a game changer. And lets not forget this is nothing new in world of car building. Aluminum bodies have been used since the 19teens and twenties. And many cars both past and present have aluminum chassis as well. The only thing new about this is the shear volume that the F150 is built at. The volume is so great that Alcoa is having to build new facilities to match the volume needed. That is why Ford as secured patents that are preventing the competition from following suit right away. What's funny is your comment about the CAFE standards will soon no longer apply to trucks. Thing is that's what the big 3 said back in the seventies concerning those same pollution standards. They sure didn't go way. In fact they just keep getting more and more stringent.
This is true, its going to be a heated race for quite a few years to come. However, I disagree with your GM statement. RAM is the real player now, GM is an also ran and losing market share. Just watch it over the new few years.
You really think so about the Ram? If that is truly the case, the why is it that on the heavy duty trucks, did they completely copy the Ford Super Duty front suspension? Not to mention I for one would much rather have parallel leaf springs in the rear of a true work truck. Coils spring rear suspensions belong under a car not a truck. Especially when carrying large and heavy loads.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.