2.3L Ecoboost
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 560
Likes: 1
2.3L Ecoboost
Lincoln just introduced the 2015 MKC crossover. It has as an option a 2.3L Ecoboost engine that puts out 275 HP and 300 torque. Similar to the current 3.7L V6 standard in the F150.
Does this engine make it into the F150 lineup? Discuss......
Does this engine make it into the F150 lineup? Discuss......
Logistics Pro
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,738
Likes: 103
From: FL
I would be willing to wager that that 2.3L EB will most likely carry higher price points than the 3.7L v6. This would most likely keep if from the lineup for companies and individuals who want stripped down base model work trucks.
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Likes: 6
I could see this in say XL, STX & XLT models. Reg/ Super Cab, preferably 6/speed manual, but we all know it would be automatic only. Probably not geared lower numerically than 3.55 at the least but 3.73 and a 4.10 option would be best suited. Would also likely be 2wd only, like the four cylinder EcoBoost Explorer?
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 1
From: South Jersey
Since the 2015 F-150's are targeted by Ford to go down by as much as 700 LBS. in vehicle weight, the 2.3 Eco sounds like a reasonable engine option in some models. I think it's a possibility.
Trending Topics
Laughing Gas
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 57
My wife currently drives a Ford Edge with the 2.0 ecoboost.
Its 240 hp. no clue on the Tq....
It moves the 4K lbs Edge around with no problems whatsoever.
You would never know it was a 4 banger.
While the 2.3 would be fine in a F150.... I don't think the Truck buying public is ready for that......... yet.
Its 240 hp. no clue on the Tq....
It moves the 4K lbs Edge around with no problems whatsoever.
You would never know it was a 4 banger.
While the 2.3 would be fine in a F150.... I don't think the Truck buying public is ready for that......... yet.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 722
Likes: 6
As crazy as it sounds, combining the 2.3T EcoBoost with say a CVT would help keep the power in the power band. My wife's car which is a 2013 Subaru Outabck (A somewhat heavy crossover vehicle) Only has a 170hp N/A 4-pot. But it "feels" more powerful than it actually is due to the CVT.
People may laugh or be uncertain about CVT's, and I was too before I owned one. But I am completely comfortable with them now, I also read one of the big three was considering a CVT in the heavy duty class to gain improved mpg's.
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,009
Likes: 1,517
From: Maine, Virginia
LMAO!!! I remember this mirror image of conversations when rumors of the 3.5L in the F-150 were going around.
I think that we naysayers have been proven wrong. I'm keeping an open mind on this one.
I think that we naysayers have been proven wrong. I'm keeping an open mind on this one.
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 2
As far as the additional cost over the 3.7 N/A for fleet purchases, I wouldn't be too sure of that. I'm seeing a *lot* of fleet F-150s running around with the 3.5EB in them, presumably for fuel savings.
For performance, keep in mind that it wasn't terribly long ago - 1997 - that the 5.4 was making 235hp @ 4250 and 335lb-ft @ 3000. The trucks have gained weight since then, but that will decrease for 2015 and probably get back down to where the 1997 trucks were. Plus, the turbo motor will deliver its power at much lower RPM.
I definitely wouldn't rule this one out - especially for people and fleets that use their trucks primarily to haul things around in the bed, and aren't towing heavy.
For performance, keep in mind that it wasn't terribly long ago - 1997 - that the 5.4 was making 235hp @ 4250 and 335lb-ft @ 3000. The trucks have gained weight since then, but that will decrease for 2015 and probably get back down to where the 1997 trucks were. Plus, the turbo motor will deliver its power at much lower RPM.
I definitely wouldn't rule this one out - especially for people and fleets that use their trucks primarily to haul things around in the bed, and aren't towing heavy.
Hotshot
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,459
Likes: 10
From: RVA
For someone like myself who rarely tows, but uses his truck for moderate duty work around the house and for fun (hauling bikes, furniture, etc) where a SUV doesn't really fit the bill due to vertical space or completely destroying an interior, I see the possibility of a 2.3L EB being a strong contender. I'm curious to see how this plays out. If the 2.3L EB could produce similar performance to the current 3.7L V6 yet produce a touch more economy then why not, right? Plus I'm sure that with a touch of tuning the 2.3L could be a screamer.
Super Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 25,479
Likes: 738
From: Isanti, MN
I bet that it would be a very similar comparison as between the current generation EB and 5.0L engine. Both make very similar amounts of power, but the EB makes more torque down low, so I would bet that the 2.3 would drive better. Just my opinion of course.