Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

general ranger advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2013 | 08:35 PM
  #1  
joey2fords's Avatar
joey2fords
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 8
general ranger advice

hello, ranger people ... an ad caught my eye on craigslist ... thinking of going to check it out
s8kjt-4168097878@sale.craigslist.org ... hope this link works (computard).

dont know what year it is or what the mileage is but i have been on the lookout for something that can carry me and the 2 grandkids around. i have a single cab f250 but it's just too cramped with 3 people and all their gear in there.

anyways ... i am totally new to rangers ... what should i look out for in this generation of ford ranger ?

thanks
 
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2013 | 08:45 PM
  #2  
joey2fords's Avatar
joey2fords
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 8
edit : looks like it's a 1990 model. also, after i plugged his phone number in the search area i see that he has 2 other vehicles for sale; always a big turn-off for me. even so, i would like to know the story on rangers of this era.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2013 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
garthneddy's Avatar
garthneddy
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 9
From: Franklin, IN
The link doesn't work.

A big problem with rangers is rust. More specifically the rear cab mounts, leaf spring hangers, shackles and shackle mounts.

Wecan tell you more once the link is up.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2013 | 09:27 AM
  #4  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,491
Likes: 2,806
Club FTE Gold Member
The Super Cab Ranger is OK for two up front, but much worse than an F250 for 3 sitting up front. That would depend on the seats also. The rear seats are terrible. They are a fold down pad and you sit sideways with no headrest or shoulder belt.

I had 5 adults in my '86 SC Ranger. It was a little stuffy, even with the AC defrost on full the windows fogged.....

Crew cab or a car/suv would be my suggestion.

An OHV V6 or 5.0 V8 Explorer up to '01 would be something to consider imo.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2013 | 12:26 PM
  #5  
joey2fords's Avatar
joey2fords
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 8
sorry ... lack of computer knowledge shows there ... it's not a link but if you copy and paste it into the search engine the ad will come up.

anyways, thats the kind of info i am looking for garth. also, does the 4.0 engine use a timing belt or chain ? how are the trannys (automatic) and engines for durability ?

i would normally have myself, and 2 boys aged 7 and 13 in it. on the rare occasions that i would have another adult in it, she/he would take the front seat with the boys in the back, so i think a ranger s/c would work just fine for what i want it for. am also keeping my eyes open for a s/c f-series as well.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2013 | 12:30 PM
  #6  
garthneddy's Avatar
garthneddy
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,271
Likes: 9
From: Franklin, IN
The ads been deleted.
 
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2013 | 03:12 PM
  #7  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,491
Likes: 2,806
Club FTE Gold Member
4.0 OHV uses a conventional timing chain and pushrods.

4.0 SOHC uses three chains and older models should be avoided unless you can confirm a recent rebuild or are prepared to do one yourself.

Ranger SC rear seat is a penalty box even for a 7 year old.....

Both in the back with two adults--everything else rides in the bed.

Short trips ok, long trips look for something bigger.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brain's 97 Diesel
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
2
Mar 3, 2014 12:07 AM
sweetpete
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
10
Jul 3, 2006 06:11 PM
AxisAllies
General Automotive Discussion
19
Nov 10, 2004 07:13 PM
rustyolred27
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
1
Oct 28, 2003 08:44 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE