Might go Excursion shopping
I personally don’t have any connection to that engine, but it was largely engineered and supplied by Navistar (International), not Ford.
The 6.7 Power Stroke was designed all in-house at Ford, so any problems with that engine rest with us and us alone.
ontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> The Suburban 2500 is discontinued for both civilian and fleet markets. Its also been redacted (cut from) the civilian Chevrolet website.
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w
ontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> I didn’t know I was a "talking head". I must say your cynical opinions are unfounded. Degrading hard-working engineers by saying they don’t have the necessary wisdom. If you have doctorate in mechanical & automotive engineering, please submit a resume to us.
Diesel fuel prices are steadily increasing; one result of smaller cars heading in the diesel direction. Currently, highway diesel costs more per-gallon than unleaded gasoline. Supply and demand.
Also the new Expedition and F-150 must meet the new government fuel economy standards that go into effect in 2016. Dropping close to 700 lbs in weight should help the cause.
An Expedition Hybrid with parallel electric-drive is on the way, as are other methods for increasing fuel efficiency, while offering high towing capability. Diesel is being considered, but if fuel prices keep climbing, then you can write that off.
Ford cannot control fuel prices; we just try to fight them by offering customers the best solution for the moment. We change as the market changes.
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->
First don't be offended by what you are, even if the talking points you express don't resonated with everyone. We all have opinions and your expressing the one Ford has... That's your job so do it with conviction.
My resume is Nuclear... sorry it doesn't apply in an automotive forum.
A Cynic often is young and educated but lacks knowledge obtained by experience= real world. Therefore I think you have it backwards... but that just my opinion. I expressed a willingness to see, and a commitment to buy, if Ford can deliver on their talking points. I don't think they can based on the past.... and everyone knows the best predictor of the future is the past, so my opinions are formed based on experience... not hope and change. You on the other hand are standing firm against experience and unwilling to acknowledge real world examples... that's being cynical.
Diesel electric traction motor hybrid make lots of sense.... kinda like Locomotives... but Lithium batteries are expensive and can be unsafe.... and that's not an opinion. Once battery technology catches up we'll have something to talk about regarding hybrids.
Clean Diesel powered vehicles, while at an economic disadvantage at the pump, are finding more acceptance. Just imagine what that market would become with NG or Propane as the fuel of choice? Hmmmm.... but I digress.
When you carry the kool-aid to a forum and try and pass it around your gonna get some takers ... but not me... I'm drinking beer.
Move along.... nothing for your here.
ontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--> I’m not here to argue with anyone or sway anyone’s opinions. I’m here to relay information about the new Expedition as some users were asking about details. This is on my time, not Ford's. <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w
ontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> If my information is not wanted, then my services here are done.
I've now read through 6 threads where DaveTN posted in....LocDoc, you are in a no-win situation. I am by no means a frequent forum guy, but I have seen guys like DaveTN before in the only other forum I posted in. Dont get me wrong, I'm sure he is a smart guy, but you will NEVER be able to win him over. Guys like him like to lob arrogance over the keyboard and have a laugh when newbies respond attempting to defend to themselves.
LocDoc, I am assuming that you are a Ford guy and have found your posts very interesting. Friendly word of advice, keep to the facts and leave it at that. Don't respond to him. It keeps the threads shorter anyway!
Reality is tough and the world is a market place of ideas, debates and truth. ... just sayin'
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Will the real Ford... the market leader of innovation, please step forward.
</O

Just because Ford does something before GM "today", that does not make Ford the "innovator" they once were. Ford excited the WHOLE automotive community in the past. They were the company to watch, made young people get excited and old folks wish they were young.Oh, and by the way... turbo's were first introduced in 1962 by Oldsmobile in cars and dual chargers were put into vehicles in 1986 by Porsche (taxing my memory now). So how does that fit into your BS?
...just sayin'





