When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I don't have anything personally against Mulally. He just represents a broad problem. No sense of what's 'unseemly' anymore in the top ranks of the corporate World.......and with the stockholder boards which grant them these mega-mega pay packages......and ultimately golden parachutes. It just ain't 'right'. It may be legal, but it ain't right.
I don't have anything personally against Mulally. He just represents a broad problem. No sense of what's 'unseemly' anymore in the top ranks of the corporate World.......and with the stockholder boards which grant them these mega-mega pay packages......and ultimately golden parachutes. It just ain't 'right'. It may be legal, but it ain't right.
Oh, come on, we all know Mulally's the first guy, and probably the only guy who thought "Gosh, I bet we could sell a lot more cars if they just didn't burn so darn much gas."
Ford's selling cars on their fuel economy, so jeez, give the guy some credit........................
Oh, come on, we all know Mulally's the first guy, and probably the only guy who thought "Gosh, I bet we could sell a lot more cars if they just didn't burn so darn much gas."
Ford's selling cars on their fuel economy, so jeez, give the guy some credit........................
Well I'm all for that....
Dodge appears to be taking the lead with their trucks, though. Their 1500s are getting from the mid to high -20s mpg.
You don't have to convince me of the 'mileage' argument, clux. If there wasn't such a political aversement to 'fossil fuels' and making any of them appear to be desirable as a long-term fuel source, then we'd have the European-style (SOME of them built by Ford) passenger diesels over here.........Such diesels getting in the 60s and 70s mpg.
But hey. It's all about pushing non-fossil fuels. Can't make diesel look good. (which is also probably why diesel is so much more expensive than gasoline).
If Bill Ford hadn't hired Alan Mullaly away from Boeing, FoMoCo most likely would have gone bankrupt.
2005: FoMoCo put up all the company assets including the rights to the blue oval to procure as 23.8 billion dollar loan to stave off bankruptcy.
Now y'all know why FoMoCo didn't need 'bailout' bucks.
Originally Posted by Jmatthews
Wonder how much GM's CEO's got from our tax money?
The disparity of info about bailout bucks, who got them, why and has it yet been repaid casts too many in the wrong light. Ford was struggling much the same as GM but shrewdly saved itself, mostly out of the larger public eye. Incredibly bad timing had GM failing at a time self-recovery would have been nearly impossible or not able to happen before creditors swooped in and liquidated it all.
Incidentally GM has repaid almost all of the bailout money and remains a large US employer. If/when any US auto maker closes up the loss of jobs both directly and indirectly would be staggering, not enough McDonalds to absorb that large jobless labor force.
Alan Mulally did a great job at Boeing and seems he's doing much the same at Ford too. What's he worth? I say let him put himself on the market and see who hires him and for how much. His record speaks for itself I think.
Maybe we post annual earnings of the UAW officials too?
Mulally was in the market when Bill Ford hired him. Don't hate the player...hate the game. Ford made the right decision...we'll see if his philosophy holds up after he's gone.
Incidentally GM has repaid almost all of the bailout money and remains a large US employer
Only FIAT (Chrysler) has repaid the gov't. GM ran a nationwide ad awhile back saying they had repaid, but left out the fact that they had only repaid the bailout bucks that Bush gave them.
GM still owes the gov't BILLIONS of Obama bail out bucks.
Only FIAT (Chrysler) has repaid the gov't. GM ran a nationwide ad awhile back saying they had repaid, but left out the fact that they had only repaid the bailout bucks that Bush gave them.
GM still owes the gov't BILLIONS of Obama bail out bucks.
Thanks for the clarification---might bear a bit more reading or investigating on my part!
Dodge appears to be taking the lead with their trucks, though. Their 1500s are getting from the mid to high -20s mpg. Not sure if I believe all that hype, either. I might believe 22 or so, probably less for day to day driving.
You don't have to convince me of the 'mileage' argument, clux. If there wasn't such a political aversement to 'fossil fuels' and making any of them appear to be desirable as a long-term fuel source, then we'd have the European-style (SOME of them built by Ford) passenger diesels over here.........Such diesels getting in the 60s and 70s mpg.
But hey. It's all about pushing non-fossil fuels. Can't make diesel look good. (which is also probably why diesel is so much more expensive than gasoline).
I'd also like to see a crop of small deisel cars available here. However, the political climate won't allow it. Even if deisel is a little dirtier (probably not with the ULSD on the market), 60 MPG in a diesel is still better, pollution wise, than 33 MPG from gas... isn't it?
Anyway, to your point about CEO salaries. I know this argument comes up from time to time, and I agree with you in principle. But surely you aren't suggesting the government intervene in this part of the free market?
I'd also like to see a crop of small deisel cars available here. However, the political climate won't allow it.
I know.
Originally Posted by stu37d
Even if deisel is a little dirtier (probably not with the ULSD on the market), 60 MPG in a diesel is still better, pollution wise, than 33 MPG from gas... isn't it?
Yup.
But I don't think it's a 'pollution' concern. It's a 'fossil fuels' concern in general. The idiots can't abide a large percentage of U.S. passenger vehicles getting that kind of mileage from (horror of horrors!!!).....DIESEL!
There's no other reason to ban those cars from domestic sales. None.
If high mpgs aren't coming from 'alternative' sources of energy, then the powerful forces at work behind the scenes (and you can fill in your own blanks here) don't want to hear about it......let alone allow it.
Originally Posted by stu37d
Anyway, to your point about CEO salaries. I know this argument comes up from time to time, and I agree with you in principle. But surely you aren't suggesting the government intervene in this part of the free market?
I'll not entertain silly questions.
I think you know me better than that.
A man can protest without calling for Gov't intervention, can't he?
(dang.....so I turned around and entertained the silly question anyway.......)
Only FIAT (Chrysler) has repaid the gov't. GM ran a nationwide ad awhile back saying they had repaid, but left out the fact that they had only repaid the bailout bucks that Bush gave them.
GM still owes the gov't BILLIONS of Obama bail out bucks.
Correct.
I just heard a snippet on the news a few minutes ago, but it mentioned a little over $29-billion had been repaid out of the $49-billion 'bailout' money..........and the Gov't just resold about $700-million in common stock shares back to private investors.
A man can protest without calling for Gov't intervention, can't he?
Yeah, protest away. I don't necessarily agree with you on the salary portion. The market decides such things. I would like to see the shareholders pull their collective heads out of the dark place they seem to be most of the time, and stop giving these guys ridiculous salaries EVEN WHEN THEY FAIL. That's the part that gets me steamed. And a little jealous. I'm pretty sure I could have effed up the company (can I say that in this forum?) just as much as the guy that walks away with $100 million, only I could have done it way cheaper! I'll take a mere $10 Million to screw a corporation up beyond recognition. Here's my card:
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.