Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

Thinking of downsizing, some help please.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2013 | 08:11 AM
  #1  
crazyrwe's Avatar
crazyrwe
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Thinking of downsizing, some help please.

Hello, I have a 2007 f250 superduty v10 and was thinking of downsizing, any pros/cons on either the ecoboost engine vs. the 5.0, thanks for the input. I am looking at a used f150 4x4 , 2011 or 2012 with low mileage maybe.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2013 | 11:08 AM
  #2  
clydesride's Avatar
clydesride
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Get a 5.0, they are cheaper and about the same mileage bro. I know anything will guzzle less than the V-10, great power but eeek!
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2013 | 12:36 PM
  #3  
Turbo Dog's Avatar
Turbo Dog
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,061
Likes: 39
From: Laramie, WY
I stay away from engines with turbos because they are an added expense. The turbo contiues to spin after you shut off your engine. And since the oil pump stops at that time the turbo is spinning without any forced lubrication.

The large industrial engines I deal with all use an independent oil pump that runs after the engine has stopped untill the turbo stops spinning. These turbos are much larger but the principle is the same.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2013 | 02:10 PM
  #4  
crazyrwe's Avatar
crazyrwe
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Thank you guys for the input, I appreciate it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2013 | 06:01 PM
  #5  
Snowman 8's Avatar
Snowman 8
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 522
Likes: 21
From: Minnesota
I did the same thing as you are thinking about and don't regret it a bit. I had a 2005 F350 with a 6.0 and traded for an 11 F150 screw with a 5.0 and loved it until I drove a 13 F150 Eco boost! Needless to say I am driving the Eco boost now! Both F150's are have pretty much the same options, gears, tires,etc.the only diff. is the 13 has navigation and of course the Eco boost. Don't get me wrong the 5.0 is a great engine but the Eco pulls trailers so much better than the 5.0 it's not even funny. I don't think the mileage will change enough to notice but if it does get better great.
Don't worry about the turbos like in a previous post. The Eco boost isn't the first engine to have a turbo on it, they have been on gas or Diesel engines for years and millions of miles! Of the two 6.0's that I had the turbos were about the only thing that I didn't have trouble with!
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2013 | 09:28 PM
  #6  
PrinceValium's Avatar
PrinceValium
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,946
Likes: 11
From: Northern California
Well first off what are you going to be towing? You can't go wrong with eiher the 5.0 or the ecoboost. I personally will be getting the ecoboost due to the low end torque and the ability to tow up to 11,200 lbs. The 5.0 can only tow up to 9500 lbs. with a 4x2, super crew, and a 6' bed (3.73 gearing). (XLT)

There have been no issues with the turbos as of yet for the ecoboost, just an intercooler issue I believe they have resolved. Some say they the ecoboost gets a tad better gas milage, however that is a very subjective subject. Good luck on your choice!
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 05:24 AM
  #7  
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
Super Moderator
15 Year Member
Veteran: Coast Guard
Community Builder
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 40,009
Likes: 1,517
From: Maine, Virginia
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by crazyrwe
Hello, I have a 2007 f250 superduty v10 and was thinking of downsizing, any pros/cons on either the ecoboost engine vs. the 5.0, thanks for the input. I am looking at a used f150 4x4 , 2011 or 2012 with low mileage maybe.

If I were looking for an Ecoboost, I most likely wouldn't go used unless I purchased an extended warranty..... only because some have had the intercooler and related issues. I believe these issues are not as wide spread as the internet would have us believe but bad luck follows good people sometimes.

If you could verify the build date, a late build 2012 new or used is safe. This issue had supposedly been completely resolved for 2013, I guess we will find out.

I have had no issues and I'd get another one tomorrow if I were looking.

The 5.0L is perhaps the least talked about truck engine in Ford's stable. It's sad as it's a great little engine and it's laying down some awesome numbers. But, it's not rated to pull over 10K and it needs to rev like crazy to do it.

My vote is for a new or late model used Ecoboost or a 5.0L of any vintage.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2013 | 07:55 AM
  #8  
crazyrwe's Avatar
crazyrwe
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Well Prince, the heaviest thing is a 18ft Lund with a 75 Honda on it. It's not super heavy, i'm not sure of the specs right now on it. I owned a 95 f150 with the 302 5 litre, is that the same as we are speaking of with the newer f150's as well?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 06:50 AM
  #9  
Hawkdriver69's Avatar
Hawkdriver69
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Both engines will work great for what you need it for. Really it's just the matter of getting the best deal. The rebates are a lot better on the 5.0 because of the popularity of the Ecoboost. So you may be able to find a new leftover 12' with a 5.0 and get it for the same price as a used 11' or 12' Ecoboost/5.0. I do have a 12' Ecoboost myself, and I love it. Zero problems so far with 12700 miles on it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 10:48 AM
  #10  
PrinceValium's Avatar
PrinceValium
Cargo Master
10 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,946
Likes: 11
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by crazyrwe
Well Prince, the heaviest thing is a 18ft Lund with a 75 Honda on it. It's not super heavy, i'm not sure of the specs right now on it. I owned a 95 f150 with the 302 5 litre, is that the same as we are speaking of with the newer f150's as well?
Well I would guess that boat weighs around 3,000 lbs. fully loaded with fuel and gear. If you are not planning on buying a trailer to tow then you really wouldn't need the max tow feature. I think Hawk and Tseekins both have good points. It is all a matter of preference at this point.

You owe it to yourself to go test drive them back to back and get a feel for how they both drive, sound, etc. The ecoboost is super quiet while the 5.0 has a certain growl. Both the 3.5L ecoboost and the 5.0L would pull that boat of yours like it wasn't even there and in comfort. Like also mentioned the 5.0L will also have more incentives than the Ecoboost which can save you even more money.

Here are the specs on the different motors:

The 3.5L (V-6) Ecoboost has 365 HP @5,000 rpm and 420 lbs-ft. torque @ 2500 rpm (that is not a typo great low end torque!!)

The 5.0L (V-8) has 360 HP @5500 rpm and 380 lbs.-ft. torque @ 4250 rpm.

For your reference the 3.7L (V-6) has 302 HP @6500 rpm and 278 lbs.-ft torque @ 4000 rpm.

You might also want to think about one with a back-up camera that will make your hooking up much easier.

I want the ecoboost for it's low end torque which will help at the boat ramps and also in the mountain areas. I also have the potential of towing a trailer in the future.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
jimk55124's Avatar
jimk55124
Cross-Country
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by crazyrwe
Well Prince, the heaviest thing is a 18ft Lund with a 75 Honda on it. It's not super heavy, i'm not sure of the specs right now on it. I owned a 95 f150 with the 302 5 litre, is that the same as we are speaking of with the newer f150's as well?

I've got a early '11 EB FX4 with 15M on it and haven't had a bit of trouble with it. I tow a 18 ft. Tyee with a 150 on it so it's a bit heavier than yours but still only about 3000 lbs fully loaded. The EB and 3.73 gears pull it like it's not even back there...much better than the '04 5.4L and 3.55's I had, which was still adequate. The low-end torque in the EB is awesome (more than the Hemi and at much lower RPMs') and Ford says you get 80% of your torque at around 1700 so it pulls like crazy at just above an idle and it maintains full-torque to around 5000. My gas mileage using mid-grade (89) runs in the 15-16 range with the boat on the back which beats the old 5.4 by 3+ mpg as long as I don't go over 70. I believe there are a good number of folks that have had or heard of turbo problems over the years and one of those problems was coking caused by fast shut-downs (thermal shock-they run very hot) but the EB has small turbo's and they are liquid cooled in addition to the oil cooling so Ford feels they've addressed the problem. I have a friend who is an advisor at a dealership and he has not heard of one problem with the turbos and i have an aquaintance who has 100M on an '11 and has had 0 problems. Having said all that, I'd suggest getting an extended warranty just in case. With all the technology in the truck, it could get expensive in a hurry. I won't knock the 5.0, it's been a pretty good engine but drive an EB and buy what suits you.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2013 | 12:18 PM
  #12  
cb_13's Avatar
cb_13
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 116
From: St James, Missouri
The new 5.0 and old 5.0 (302) are both gas powered V8's made by Ford. That is about the only things they have in common.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2013 | 10:09 AM
  #13  
capn kirk's Avatar
capn kirk
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 1
5.0s are great motors we use them in several of our work trucks but myself and one of my buddies I work with have ecoboost 150s we can easily say we wouldn't even consider trading love the ecoboost. He came from having diesel 350s and got tired of diesel problems and costs and he couldn't be happier with the switch this motor pulls like a mule and runs like a scalded dog.
 
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2013 | 01:01 PM
  #14  
crazyrwe's Avatar
crazyrwe
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Thank you all for the replys, i'll have to see what $ they are getting, thanks again for the great info.
 
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2013 | 11:05 PM
  #15  
Champ198's Avatar
Champ198
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: Lebanon TN
I had a 2011 F350 6.7 PSD 4x4. Sold it when we sold our 5th wheel and got out of camping. Went with the EcoBoost. After 28k miles in 15 months, not one single warranty claim filed. It's never let me down and it tows my boat just fine. Not afraid of turbos as the EcoBoost design is very similar to the 6.7 design. Great truck. Only trips to the dealer have been for oil changes and tire rotate. Mileage is outstanding for a pickup.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE