engine power
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
you probably didnt have the right gears. if every 300 you ever had had 2.73 gears than no wonder every 300 you had was a gutless dog put 4.10s in her and then see. also the inline sixes are built for horsepower they were built for low down stump pulling torque not for pampered rich snobs who think they have to do the speed limit with a 4 ton load behind them in a vehicle that has terrible aerodynamics to begin with not to mention the fact that a 300 will kill a 302 or 351 in terms on reliability and longetivity. or maybe ur trucks just suck
Lead Driver
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
Or maybe 300-6s are just gutless? You put 4.10s on a 300-6 5spd with stock tires, and you'd be spinning 2700 RPM just to do 70. That's strung out for a 300-6. 3rd at the redline would only carry you to ~49 MPH. The truck would be pretty much useless for modern highway traffic.
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Hartland, WI
The inline 6 pulls good down low, but runs out of breath quickly. My 351 has pretty good midrange punch for a stock smallblock, even in such a heavy truck. I've driven Dakota R/Ts and S/C Lightnings, they're fast trucks to say the least. Pin to the seat power title goes to my old Typhoon, that would surprise quite a few people, and give both the R/T and Lightning a run for their money.
I used to also have an 81 Chevy C20 with the 292, 4.10s and the SM465 trans. Would pull damn near anything, but was screaming at 3k a little above 60.
I used to also have an 81 Chevy C20 with the 292, 4.10s and the SM465 trans. Would pull damn near anything, but was screaming at 3k a little above 60.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Hartland, WI
The Achilles heel for those trucks was anything above 60-70mph. They paid dearly for the lack of aerodynamics.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Or maybe 300-6s are just gutless? You put 4.10s on a 300-6 5spd with stock tires, and you'd be spinning 2700 RPM just to do 70. That's strung out for a 300-6. 3rd at the redline would only carry you to ~49 MPH. The truck would be pretty much useless for modern highway traffic.
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
true but it wasnt built for horsepower and it has poor flowing heads by design so high speed power is a no
my grandpas dad had a 67 chevy k10 that had a 4 speed and 6.11 gears he said he pulled tractors out of mud with it no problem but would top out at 63 MPH
x