When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Too difficult to make a 30-year-old cast-iron design meet EPA regs for CAFE & emissions standards. I feel your pain. I had always hoped they would make it distributorless, but the best they ever did was MAF in '96 (the last year).
Lets see, it lasts too long, makes better torque than the car motors in trucks now, too easy to fix yourself, and wont fit under that ugly sloped hood.
Kinda like the new GM I6 in the Trail Blazer. 270 hp from a little I6 with variable cam timing. They also have very good torque numbers (320 ft-lbs ???) on paper, but are a terd to drive.
maybe its cuz people dont use trucks like they're supposed to and want more hp and the 300 was slow in respect to the 4.2s or it wouldnt fit they can out last most truck they were put in or its not what ford wanted as a baseline engine cuz its not some fancy mod motor or makes 200hp...ah o well, if ford makes a new inline they'll screw it up and make it a mod with a torque like the 4.2 cheby i6, about 3500 peak...
V-12, 13 mains, 3mpg, as much torque as you could ever want!
I think that the only major thing that people don't like about the I6 is that its so slow on the road. It really isn't that bad as long as you keep it tuned up though.
The 300 also cost much more to cast and Machine compared to V-8s. The cranks are very costy to manufacture. 7 mains and 6 rod journals compared to 5 mains and 4 rod journals of a V-8. I actually like my 300 for towing more than my 460 but the 460 flyes on the hwy.
Ford should come out with a 60 degree V12 in there super duties, I would probably shell out 40 grand for a new truck then, for now I have my 300, oh yeah and the 460