Notices
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Running premium fuel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2012 | 07:42 AM
  #16  
03 Maz B23's Avatar
03 Maz B23
Elder User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 966
Likes: 1
Not sure about the 98 but the newer engines generally have a knock sensor. If it detects knocking the computer retards the timing to eliminate it. Probably one of the reasons they recommend the 87 octane since the computer/sensor will make the necessary compensations.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2012 | 12:05 PM
  #17  
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Driver
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,868
Likes: 9
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Dan Robertson
In one of my earlier posts on this thread I mentioned that it almost pays for itself. It costs me between 2 and 3 cents per mile more to burn hi-test. For that 2 or 3 cents, I get a quieter running engine that has more power on the hills. I've owned the truck for 10 years and I have put 155,000 of the miles on it myself. (it turned over to 238,000 last night) I'm 55 years old and don't need a power house. My lame 3.0 is just about bullet proof and gets me from A to B. Maybe something is wrong with it but if there is, it has been wrong for 10 years and 155,000 miles and the hi-test gas hasn't had an negative effects, only positive ones. In case anyone is wondering, my truck spark knocks on mid grade gas too (89 octane up here in Northern Maine)
By "lame" I meant the engine does not make enough power, or have high enough compression to actually need premium. If it knocks on 87 and 89, then something is quite wrong with your ignition system.
 
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2012 | 06:11 PM
  #18  
erikwi's Avatar
erikwi
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the thoughts on this subject. I periodically ran 93 octane in my 97 with the pushrod 4.0L without problems. I had 296,787 miles on it but road salt finally took its toll on the poor beast, eating the frame to the point I was afraid to put any weight on it. I have run 2 tanks of 93 in the 2011 in the 6 months I've had it. The only difference I've noticed is that the cold engine skip I've had goes away on 93. The skip is bad enough when backing out of the driveway that I can feel it through the seat and I have to give it more gas to get out of the driveway than what I would on a warm engine. No codes in the ECM so it is something the computer is not picking up. The dealer couldn't find a cause either so until it sets a code, I'm not going to worry about it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2012 | 11:40 AM
  #19  
pawpaw's Avatar
pawpaw
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 13,851
Likes: 111
From: SW Va
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Dan Robertson
The reason that I started running hi test was because my truck was spark knocking in over drive whenever I was traveling 50 MPH or less (especially on the hills) and on certain longer hills I had to shift down to 4th gear. My grandfather used to run high test gas in an old Farmall tractor during the fall when he used it to dig potatoes. It wouldnt haul the digger in 2nd gear with regular but would with high test. He passed away in 1978 and I still have his old tractor. I dont farm potatoes but I do plow snow. The tractor will not plow snow in 3rd gear with regular gas but it will with high test. (2nd doesn't give enough ground speed to cast the snow away but 3rd does) I know that my truck is a different situation than the tractor as it is controlled by a computer. My truck will pull the same long hills in 5th gear when using high test and there is no spark knocking what so ever. I have been running high test for roughly 154,500 miles with no engine problems at all. I service it religiously and it still doesn't burn any oil at all. I have switched back numerous times and every time that I do, my mileage decreases by about 4 mph and it starts spark knocking almost immediately. I even disconnected the battery over night once prior to running a fresh full tank of regular gas. I was hoping that it would have to learn how to run again with regular gas but it never did. I also have a 2005 Ford Escape with a 3.0 and an automatic transmission. The high test makes seems to make no difference in that vehicle at all and it doesn't spark knock so I use regular gas in that one. The extra cost of the high test and the added mileage almost equal themselves out but not quite. It does cost me a few pennies per mile more with the high test.
Maybe consider taking the time to view these short videos by Chevron, about engine deposit loading & how they chose to address the problem.
Engine Cleaners# Click on the little projector symbols below each heading, to view a video.
The videos give some insight into where, how & why intake, injector & combustion chamber deposits form & how Techron works & how it goes about its clean up job. Maybe a dose or two with Fords high rpm blow it out decarb proceedure I posted will help wean your Ranger from its premium fuel addicition!!!!

A twice yearly dose of the 20oz Techron Concentrate Plus, along with the high rpm 'blow it out" routine I posted, during the treated tank, sure has helped keep my 4.0L CCDI cold start up "marble noise" clatter in check over the years.

More thoughts for consideration, if you decide to try it out, let us know how it goes.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
daveya48187
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
9
Aug 12, 2013 02:33 PM
NetCommuter
1997 - 2003 F150
6
Nov 4, 2007 07:57 PM
DURAN333
2004 - 2008 F150
11
Sep 20, 2005 04:09 PM
jbabbler
3.0L V6
3
Jan 7, 2005 10:02 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE