Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Wheel cylinders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 11:35 PM
  #16  
1930 Dodge's Avatar
1930 Dodge
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1
Yeah, you do, even if the MC is up high (not under the floor). Otherwise the pistons retract all the way and it takes a couple of pumps to get contact. I thought I had it written down somewhere but I can't find it; I think drums need a 10 psi RPV, discs only need 2 or 3 psi. A Search will find it on here, Ernie/Eman92082 had a thread on it: https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...drum-drum.html
Based on the comments within the provided link above if I am interpreting things correctly I CAN use my 1986 Disk drum master with no problems because ......... The master in the picture is for "drum disc", the drum side is the small side. So if you want to use it for "drum drum", it should work fine, plenty of volume.

The problem would be if you wanted to use a "drum drum" master to do "drum disc" brakes, there will not be enough volume for the disc.............

I am a bit confused because on another board in which I have posted the same questions too a member said this within his comments ...............Additionally, the 86 master is for disks up front which use very little fluid to actuate compared to drums...............I am as I am sure you have all guessed using the stock drum drum set-up, Thanks again for all the great input, Ill get this truck back on the road yet with all of your help!
 
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2012 | 11:56 PM
  #17  
1930 Dodge's Avatar
1930 Dodge
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
I am searching on-line and I can see now that a residual valve and a proportioning valve are clearly not the same. I guess I am finally now starting to figure out why my brakes just plain stunk! Just plain didnt know what I was doing the first time, hopefully that wont happen again
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 12:36 AM
  #18  
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,290
Likes: 1,055
From: NM
Sorry I've been off-line, but it sounds like you've got it figured out. You shouldn't need a proportioning valve, but you do need residual valves, ones with the ratings for drum brakes. Your MC may have one in the drum port already.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 07:41 AM
  #19  
oldmerc's Avatar
oldmerc
oldmerc
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 5
From: Edmonton,Alberta
Club FTE Gold Member
Thats why the old mustang drum/drum dual MC is a good choice . It has residual valves in both ports .
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 08:37 AM
  #20  
JimG1098's Avatar
JimG1098
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 37
From: Eastern shore,Salisbur,MD
Can mayby add a little here. I did my 54 f-750 brake system over.

Here is what I found. and did
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 08:49 AM
  #21  
JimG1098's Avatar
JimG1098
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 37
From: Eastern shore,Salisbur,MD
excuse, fat fingers on the type,
54 f-750
Ran all new lines
rebuilt all wheel cylinders. ( 6 )
rebuilt master
Sent my original boster under the frame ( 10 in type) out for rebuild.. This has to be bled out also.
What I understood at the time, with the 6 wheel cylinders, is that you are moving a lot of fluid. After some bleeding and adjustments, brakes are great.

When I was first bleeding, I got to a point where they would not bleed any more and make a difference. I still had a similar problem as yours. the rest of the pedal slak was taken up with adj the brakes. You could possible have over sized drums by now and the brakes are traveling more then normal to fill the gap.

the second part of the problem was the wheel cylinders were larger then what the parts book called for. they use to do that on some trucks, if they were heavy duty use. I wound up putting plungers that were the next size larger.


Hope this helps

JimG 1098
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 12:11 PM
  #22  
1930 Dodge's Avatar
1930 Dodge
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by oldmerc
Thats why the old mustang drum/drum dual MC is a good choice . It has residual valves in both ports .
Prob. a nieve question but will the old mustang ( approx year ? ) bolt directly onto my 1986 power brake booster. I guess what I am asking is are the spacing pretty consistent in size?
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 12:12 PM
  #23  
1930 Dodge's Avatar
1930 Dodge
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JimG1098
excuse, fat fingers on the type,
54 f-750
Ran all new lines
rebuilt all wheel cylinders. ( 6 )
rebuilt master
Sent my original boster under the frame ( 10 in type) out for rebuild.. This has to be bled out also.
What I understood at the time, with the 6 wheel cylinders, is that you are moving a lot of fluid. After some bleeding and adjustments, brakes are great.

When I was first bleeding, I got to a point where they would not bleed any more and make a difference. I still had a similar problem as yours. the rest of the pedal slak was taken up with adj the brakes. You could possible have over sized drums by now and the brakes are traveling more then normal to fill the gap.

the second part of the problem was the wheel cylinders were larger then what the parts book called for. they use to do that on some trucks, if they were heavy duty use. I wound up putting plungers that were the next size larger.


Hope this helps

JimG 1098
Thanks for that, unfortunately when I purchased the truck it was in boxes with many pieces missing so I do not have any of the original stuff.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 12:23 PM
  #24  
JimG1098's Avatar
JimG1098
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 37
From: Eastern shore,Salisbur,MD
I used an outfit out west that rebuilds them, but he actually had the exact one I needed. If you need his number, let me know. Did a great job. They were comon on a lot of trucks, back in the day
 

Last edited by JimG1098; Dec 4, 2012 at 12:24 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 01:20 PM
  #25  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by oldmerc
Thats why the old mustang drum/drum dual MC is a good choice . It has residual valves in both ports .
C7ZZ-2140-G .. Master Cylinder-Use with Power Drum Brakes / 1967/70 Mustang/Cougar.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #26  
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,290
Likes: 1,055
From: NM
Originally Posted by 1930 Dodge
Prob. a nieve question but will the old mustang ( approx year ? ) bolt directly onto my 1986 power brake booster. I guess what I am asking is are the spacing pretty consistent in size?
Couldn't say for a fact, but AutoZone normally stocks the Mustang MC, so take yours in to match. More than the hole spacing needs to match, the hole in the booster has to match up with the spigot on the MC.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 04:23 PM
  #27  
1930 Dodge's Avatar
1930 Dodge
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ALBUQ F-1
Couldn't say for a fact, but AutoZone normally stocks the Mustang MC, so take yours in to match. More than the hole spacing needs to match, the hole in the booster has to match up with the spigot on the MC.
I guess I am getting a lesson on brakes. evidently the original master cylinder ( 1952 F-7 ) used a piston bore diam of 1.5 inch, talking with a so-called brake expert ( dont want to say what company ) he says that I need to find a master with same bore diam.

This is proving to be impossible in finding one that will bolt directly onto my 1986 F-250 brake booster. Ford just did not use one this large on these later trucks with this booster and remember the booster has to work with my 1986 F-250 pedal assy that is already installed and is NOT going anywhere considering the amount of time I have in to make all of that work!

I am and have ordered a master cylinder that was originally intended for ( if I remember correctly ) 68 - 76 F-350 with a piston bore diam of 1 1/4, this I am told will bolt directly onto my booster.

I have to replace the booster anyway so I have also ordered a booster/master assy that was originally intended for a 1986 F-350 that should bolt directly to my pedal assy with no modifications. The piston bore diam of that master though is 1 1/8 .

The original 86 F-250 master that I was using had a piston bore diam of 1 inch.

I dont know wether this guy ( brake expert ) is making a mountain out of an anthill.

Maybe he is being overly ****, I understand that brakes dont want to be fooled with but the truck stopped fine with the 1 ich bore master cylinder that I have been using, the problem was or has been noted above.

Consider I dont have alot of choices I have to make a choice I guess and roll the dice and see if one of these larger masters along with two 10 pd residual valves will fix the problem.
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #28  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,984
Likes: 9,838
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
When I was cobbling together my brake system I ended up with a Ford Focus booster and a Cadillac MC.....nope, they didn't line up. the mounting studs on the booster were a little wider than the hole spacing on the MC. In typical farm boy fashion I elongated the holes in the MC slightly and bolted it together.

Sometimes you just have to make things fit....lol

Bobby
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 06:47 PM
  #29  
1930 Dodge's Avatar
1930 Dodge
Thread Starter
|
Elder User
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bobbytnm
When I was cobbling together my brake system I ended up with a Ford Focus booster and a Cadillac MC.....nope, they didn't line up. the mounting studs on the booster were a little wider than the hole spacing on the MC. In typical farm boy fashion I elongated the holes in the MC slightly and bolted it together.

Sometimes you just have to make things fit....lol

Bobby
Im not apposed to a little cobbling but would like to do the best I can at it first
 
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2012 | 07:55 PM
  #30  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,984
Likes: 9,838
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
I understand

I've never messed with the braking system on the larger trucks. I wish you luck on it

Bobby
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE