Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

F150 or F250... Which will be more reliable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:15 AM
ponyxprs's Avatar
ponyxprs
ponyxprs is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F150 or F250... Which will be more reliable?

I have a 2004 F150 SCAB FX4 with 136500 miles that has had the notorious "diesel" knock sound for some time know. I already had the Cam Phasers replaced about 25000 miles ago and do not look forward to that expense again. I also has the trans replaced (FOMOCO Reman.) about 13000 miles ago.

So, I'm looking for thoughts and suggestions on which powertrain in Fords current lineup are proving to be the most reliable in today's truck models.

Thanks for your thoughts...

Ponyxprs
 
  #2  
Old 08-01-2012, 09:20 AM
Tangi Cowboy's Avatar
Tangi Cowboy
Tangi Cowboy is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kentwood, Louisiana
Posts: 2,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I couldn't say either one would be more reliable, it just matter what you want the truck to do, I prefer F250 just because I want the big boy, but have no need for all that extra capacity, I just like it, I think the F150 will last just as long if both are treated & maintained properly, you have to choose what suites you the best, the F250 cost more up front and cost more to maintain, but there is nothing else to compare to a F250!!
 
  #3  
Old 08-01-2012, 02:38 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,088
Received 457 Likes on 333 Posts
Most reliable truck will be the one with the fewest features. Electrical stuff in the cab tends to cause a huge percentage of warranty repairs.
I remember reading that the Chevy Avalanche was rated much better in reliability then the Cadillac Escalade version of the cam vehicle just because of how often the gadget failed.


Get a base model 2wd and don't overwork it. It'll last forever.

Also, since the F150 is both cheaper to buy and cheaper to repair (brakes, tired, oil etc) I'd say even if they were the same reliability, you'd come out ahead on the F150.
 
  #4  
Old 08-01-2012, 06:16 PM
ponyxprs's Avatar
ponyxprs
ponyxprs is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the quick thoughts fo far. I am a sucker for the F250, yet I agree that the F150 would be a bit more economical from a maintenance perspective.

Any thoughts on the current engines? I was initially impressed with my 5.4L 3 valve engine but this Cam Phaser setup is like the rubber band timing belts in a foriegn car... needs replacing more frequently than I'd prefer.

What are your thoughts on the 3.5L Ecoboost, 3.7L, 5.0L, 6.2L engines?
 
  #5  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:40 PM
Going_Going_Gone's Avatar
Going_Going_Gone
Going_Going_Gone is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 495
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Just about everything on the 250 will be a little more rugged than on the 150. From my experience, the weakest part is the steering box which, even when brand new, leaves a lot to be desired. 50's tech hanging around far too long.
 
  #6  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:51 PM
MexicanScaper987's Avatar
MexicanScaper987
MexicanScaper987 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bucks county PA
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If your not doing a lot of towing, or working the truck real hard or often, you'll be alot better set with a f150 from a financial standpoint.
The 6.2L in the superduty is proving itself to be a stout engine as is the ecco boost! I love the look of the new F150's and would love one with a eb under the hood! I just tow too much weight too often and plowing snow is also a no no with those trucks now!
 
  #7  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:54 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,457
Received 700 Likes on 454 Posts
Originally Posted by ponyxprs
Any thoughts on the current engines? I was initially impressed with my 5.4L 3 valve engine but this Cam Phaser setup is like the rubber band timing belts in a foriegn car... needs replacing more frequently than I'd prefer.
That's a common issue for the 5.4L 3v that was identified and corrected in later models. For what it's worth you will have a very tough time finding a new vehicle out there without cam phasers of some variety. Most types are bullet proof, but yours was unfortunately not one of them. IIRC the change was made sometime between 2006-2007 to make them more reliable.

Originally Posted by Going_Going_Gone
Just about everything on the 250 will be a little more rugged than on the 150. From my experience, the weakest part is the steering box which, even when brand new, leaves a lot to be desired. 50's tech hanging around far too long.
Don't necessarily agree with you here. I've owned two F150s and two Super Duties, and I wouldn't necessarily think that the F150 was less reliable. Sure I couldn't put 3,000 lbs in the bed like I could my F350, but the only major thing that is more rugged in the Super Duties is the suspension and driveline. Neither have been points for repetitive failure in most F150s, but there are a number of suspension and steering issues that are even present in the current generation Super Duty. Most of them won't rear their ugly head for 70-80,000 miles or more, but they are there.

I would say that F150s are more reliable. Consumer reports agrees with me.

Now these new engines are another thing entirely. Only time will tell how well the EcoBoost will fare, but I suspect it will prove itself well. They certainly are complex animals though. And for the record every engine except the 6.2L, IIRC, has a four cam phasers compared to the two that the OP's 5.4L has. Not that this is a bad thing.
 

Trending Topics

  #8  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:51 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,318
Received 1,247 Likes on 820 Posts
^^^ I have to agree with Tom's entire post.

Don't think in terms of reliability as they are pretty equal but in terms of your needs and wants.
 
  #9  
Old 08-01-2012, 09:40 PM
1969furd's Avatar
1969furd
1969furd is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if FOMOCO is still offering the n/a v6 5 speed that is pretty bone simple,
 
  #10  
Old 08-02-2012, 06:03 AM
ponyxprs's Avatar
ponyxprs
ponyxprs is offline
Cross-Country
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks again for the feedback. I've been checking out some options, and based on how I use my truck, (light duty) the F150 is most likely what I will upgrade with when the time comes.
 
  #11  
Old 08-06-2012, 07:07 PM
ChargersFanInCO's Avatar
ChargersFanInCO
ChargersFanInCO is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sunny, Snowy, CO
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Everything on my F250 was bulletproof except the engine. (Diesel) I now have an F150 again, and I'm sorry I ever upgraded to an 8300lb truck other than to say I actually needed it 8 months out of the year. If I was towing 5-6k once a month for 150 miles each way, I'd probably stick with a 150.
 
  #12  
Old 08-07-2012, 06:34 PM
ChargersFanInCO's Avatar
ChargersFanInCO
ChargersFanInCO is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sunny, Snowy, CO
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom,

What did you do with your 6.7? What are you going to get next?
 
  #13  
Old 08-07-2012, 08:53 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,457
Received 700 Likes on 454 Posts
Originally Posted by ChargersFanInCO
Tom,

What did you do with your 6.7? What are you going to get next?
I traded it in May of 2011 for a car after I determined that I no longer needed a $50,000 truck to tow the trailer that we were selling. So I sold the truck and trailer, and am now working a deal on a coworker's Excursion. Problem is that I have to move in less than two months, and he's not sure he can make his side of the deal work by then. We'll see.

I do miss my F350 though.

 
  #14  
Old 08-07-2012, 09:30 PM
ChargersFanInCO's Avatar
ChargersFanInCO
ChargersFanInCO is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sunny, Snowy, CO
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was just wondering...I miss my 250, but man, this smaller 5.0 works for me now. I don't miss a lot of the routine maintenance, especially since I was anile about it, and it still did a number on me. Is that a Fusion Sport in the pic?
 
  #15  
Old 08-07-2012, 09:45 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,457
Received 700 Likes on 454 Posts
Originally Posted by ChargersFanInCO
Was just wondering...I miss my 250, but man, this smaller 5.0 works for me now. I don't miss a lot of the routine maintenance, especially since I was anile about it, and it still did a number on me. Is that a Fusion Sport in the pic?
Nah, it's a 4-cylinder SEL. I drive 85 miles round-trip to work every day and I'm focused on fuel economy. With my youngest born last October and my impending move across the country I opted for something that makes more sense. Once we get settled and my wife finds employment I'll look at another truck if the Excursion doesn't work out. Right now this is what I use for a truck...it's sad really:

 


Quick Reply: F150 or F250... Which will be more reliable?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.