1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  

turbo upgrades: what are my options and what will they do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 03-21-2012, 01:26 PM
DarkStarMedia's Avatar
DarkStarMedia
DarkStarMedia is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch
In Glenn's case, exhaust back pressure and boost pressure would need to be checked to determine if the exhaust side is too restrictive. IF backpressure is rising when he's pulling hard, then yeah he could benefit from a larger turbine housing or a larger turbine wheel. Doing that could cause a problem though with slower spool up and causing it to blow some smoke during spool up, which from what I gather Glenn wants just about ZERO smoke from his rig. The smoke could be held to a minimum through tuning, but he would have less power during that time and I don't think he wants that either.

The other thing is he may just be pulling extremely heavy. When you pull as heavy as he does, it's going to be pretty tough to get to stay down. He could actually probably benefit from larger injectors with larger nozzles with proper tuning and a good turbo to match, but that's a whole different can of worms.

For stage 2's, I would run the S466 in the configuration I listed before all day. The GQSSB is a good S300 charger, but they are pricey and you can only run a T4I mounting kit. That limits your turbo options down the road if you ever want to switch.

For hybrids you could still use the same S466, but depending on nozzle size, I think a step up to a 1.00 turbine housing would be beneficial.
Maybe the better option would be a variable vane turbo... pricey (likely) but that would solve the problem (I think)... that way you could have a smaller exhaust housing at low power levels (for quick spoolup) and larger housing at higher rpm/load to lower temps...

that is if I am understanding the variable vane technology....

Richard
 
  #47  
Old 03-21-2012, 01:46 PM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,007
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkStarMedia
Maybe the better option would be a variable vane turbo... pricey (likely) but that would solve the problem (I think)... that way you could have a smaller exhaust housing at low power levels (for quick spoolup) and larger housing at higher rpm/load to lower temps...

that is if I am understanding the variable vane technology....

Richard
Variable Geometry would be cool, but the problem would be controlling the vanes. In the newer trucks using VGTs, the vanes are controlled by throttle position and probably back pressure and boost pressure, not sure. Also trucks that come with a factory exhaust brake, close the turbine vanes down which works as an exhaust brake. That would be a cool function to have, but it might be tough to get the VGT working properly.
 
  #48  
Old 03-21-2012, 01:48 PM
DarkStarMedia's Avatar
DarkStarMedia
DarkStarMedia is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch
Variable Geometry would be cool, but the problem would be controlling the vanes. In the newer trucks using VGTs, the vanes are controlled by throttle positions and probably back pressure and boost pressure, not sure. Also trucks that come with a factory exhaust brake, close the turbine vanes down which works as an exhaust brake. That would be a cool function to have, but it might be tough to get the VGT working properly.
I dont see why not...

A simple micro-controller based on a PIC chip should be able to do that... jou just have to figure out the parameters...

I'd think the harder part would be mounting the turbo...

Richard
 
  #49  
Old 03-21-2012, 01:57 PM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,007
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkStarMedia
I dont see why not...

A simple micro-controller based on a PIC chip should be able to do that... jou just have to figure out the parameters...

I'd think the harder part would be mounting the turbo...

Richard
See, I think mounting the turbo would be the easy part. LOL There is someone that swapped in a 6.0L VGT turbo on his OBS a few years ago, but I don't remember how he controlled it. I don't think I'll ever bother. With 7.3L of displacement, we really don't have any problems spooling good sized turbos like the 6.0L guys do, so I doubt I'll ever consider doing the swap. Heck, Steve is running a 71mm S400 on his OBS with stage 2 160cc/100% injectors and it spools just fine for him. He's even using a bigger turbine housing than I have recommended in this thread. haha
 
  #50  
Old 03-21-2012, 02:06 PM
Awitte58's Avatar
Awitte58
Awitte58 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Rockford IL
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would agree with Travis on this one. Not necessarily because I know any better, but because his logic makes more sense to me! lol

And Travis is probably the Turbo combination Guru for OBS trucks IMHO.
 
  #51  
Old 03-21-2012, 02:22 PM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,007
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Awitte58
I would agree with Travis on this one. Not necessarily because I know any better, but because his logic makes more sense to me! lol

And Travis is probably the Turbo combination Guru for OBS trucks IMHO.
I honestly wouldn't say I'm any kind of "guru". There are many guys out there much smarter than I am on the subject. I just see what others are using in their combos, I've spent tons of time researching the subject on PSD forums, and pass on the info that I can. I still have a lot to learn about turbos, but they aren't terribly complicated until you start looking at compounds and triples.
 
  #52  
Old 03-21-2012, 02:59 PM
f350rebel7788's Avatar
f350rebel7788
f350rebel7788 is offline
Disabled USMC Veteran

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pilot Point, TX
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
okay, well then it sounds like the S466 is what i'm lookin for... eventually... lol I've still got alot to do before it gets to that point...
 
  #53  
Old 03-21-2012, 03:02 PM
superduty4x4's Avatar
superduty4x4
superduty4x4 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newport, WA
Posts: 12,176
Received 39 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by strokin'_tatsch
See, I think mounting the turbo would be the easy part. LOL There is someone that swapped in a 6.0L VGT turbo on his OBS a few years ago, but I don't remember how he controlled it. I don't think I'll ever bother. With 7.3L of displacement, we really don't have any problems spooling good sized turbos like the 6.0L guys do, so I doubt I'll ever consider doing the swap. Heck, Steve is running a 71mm S400 on his OBS with stage 2 160cc/100% injectors and it spools just fine for him. He's even using a bigger turbine housing than I have recommended in this thread. haha
The guy that put the 6.0 turbo on his OBS was tinkering with a home built controller for the VGT. He was an electronics guy by trade and had it working, but not dialed in 100% when that thread died and I really haven't heard anything since then about it.
 
  #54  
Old 03-21-2012, 06:38 PM
f350rebel7788's Avatar
f350rebel7788
f350rebel7788 is offline
Disabled USMC Veteran

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pilot Point, TX
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
i wish i had $700... i'd grab the S466 from this guy... maybe one of you guys could use it? 7.3 Performance Parts [Archive] - PowerStrokeNation : Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
 
  #55  
Old 03-21-2012, 07:01 PM
strokin'_tatsch's Avatar
strokin'_tatsch
strokin'_tatsch is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 10,007
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by f350rebel7788
i wish i had $700... i'd grab the S466 from this guy... maybe one of you guys could use it? 7.3 Performance Parts [Archive] - PowerStrokeNation : Ford Powerstroke Diesel Forum
That's a pretty good deal on that turbo. Normally they are ~$1k with one of the T4 housings listed(they come box stock with a T6 housing usually, I think).
 
  #56  
Old 03-21-2012, 07:19 PM
f350rebel7788's Avatar
f350rebel7788
f350rebel7788 is offline
Disabled USMC Veteran

Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pilot Point, TX
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
would a Garrett GT40 be a good one? what qualities am I lookin for??? I think the biggest problem i have with these things is that the names are all just letters and numbers and don't really explain much about the characteristics...
 
  #57  
Old 03-21-2012, 08:24 PM
bad12jr's Avatar
bad12jr
bad12jr is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Maysville, Kentucky
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S466.= s400 series frame which is Med size and stronger then a s300 series. 66 is the inducer size on compressor wheel. That's on the swizter turbos. Hx55 would be a comparable in a holset charger. Not sure on a Garrett.
 
  #58  
Old 03-21-2012, 10:37 PM
oldbird1965's Avatar
oldbird1965
oldbird1965 is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 20,283
Received 126 Likes on 104 Posts
I don't have any thing intelligent to say Travis, LOL. I pull fairly heavy, I smoke (the truck, lol), I get hot, I back off. I just like to complain. The fact is my truck pulls very well, I'm happy. Maybe complain isn't the right word, I want perfection. Next winter I'll consider pulling my injectors and have stage 2's made and go with some of your suggestions. Maybe my wife will make me buy a new pickup (that will be a cold day in he!!).
 
  #59  
Old 03-22-2012, 07:11 AM
Ken_C's Avatar
Ken_C
Ken_C is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oldbird1965
hirty years, I don't like even looking at trains anymore, burned out. These loaded coal trains are the world's largest land moving machine.
I think its cool as hell . all that steel rollin down the tracks nearly unstoppable. Diesel electric loco is an awesomely fascinating machine. would have been a secondary career choice for me. and as far as travel i would rather take a train across country than an airplane... actually i would rather be dragged by the neck behind the train than fly in an airplane.
 
  #60  
Old 03-22-2012, 08:18 AM
bad12jr's Avatar
bad12jr
bad12jr is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Maysville, Kentucky
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like you really dislike airplanes.
 


Quick Reply: turbo upgrades: what are my options and what will they do?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 PM.