1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the Super Duty getting a Cat diesel engine for 2014?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 02-21-2012, 04:53 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Okay guys, just had to clean this one up. This thread is about the future engine choice Ford will make for the Super Duty trucks. Let's please keep this one on topic.

Thanks!
 
  #32  
Old 02-21-2012, 05:03 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
There is NO WAY a CATERPILLAR engine is going to be offered in a Ford pickup.

2 reasons

1
CAT was asked by Ford when the 6.0s were having problems, if they would be interested in making a diesel for their pickup. CATs response was, Ford sells more diesel pickups in ONE year than CAT make diesel engines in a year(marine,truck, equipment, stand-alone). CAT would never be able to keep up with the demand.


2.
CAT is NO LONGER making ON-ROAD diesel engines. They were sick of trying to keep up with the emissions. Even "their" new CAT tractor trailer, is running a INTERNATIONAL engine
 
  #33  
Old 08-04-2013, 08:52 PM
chefbutthead's Avatar
chefbutthead
chefbutthead is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ONLY engine that has been worth anything in the Ford trucks was the 7.3L diesel. All of their other engines have been junk. I wish I had never sold my 1996 F350 with the 7.3 diesel engine. It was bulletproof!
 
  #34  
Old 08-04-2013, 09:45 PM
rollerstud98's Avatar
rollerstud98
rollerstud98 is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Airdrie Alberta
Posts: 4,863
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by chefbutthead
The ONLY engine that has been worth anything in the Ford trucks was the 7.3L diesel. All of their other engines have been junk. I wish I had never sold my 1996 F350 with the 7.3 diesel engine. It was bulletproof!


Nice first post 7 1/2 years after joining. The new diesel trucks are much more enjoyable to drive, i wouldnt want anything older than an 07. I have owned 2 6.0's and loved em both. Unfortunately diesel trucks didnt fit for me anymore and have had to downsize to a car.
 
  #35  
Old 08-05-2013, 06:54 AM
Parts Jimmy's Avatar
Parts Jimmy
Parts Jimmy is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new engines are NOT junk however they do not have the reliability of a non emissions diesel. I think it will be quite a few tears before we see a reliable engine as the 7.3 was. Until we do I will stick with my 2000 7.3 model.
 
  #36  
Old 08-05-2013, 02:10 PM
phillips91's Avatar
phillips91
phillips91 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rogersville, TN
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by chefbutthead
The ONLY engine that has been worth anything in the Ford trucks was the 7.3L diesel. All of their other engines have been junk. I wish I had never sold my 1996 F350 with the 7.3 diesel engine. It was bulletproof!
I would have been happy to sell you mine. I got rid of my 1997 7.3 after it left me stranded 5 times and had to be towed home by my 5.4 each time. Cam sensor twice, glow plugs/relay once, broken valve spring and then ficm.

As for the original question, I saw a car tech show on tv a few years ago and they were talking about Ford using the cat engine and that the deal fell apart because cat wanted their name on the truck like the Cummins and Ford refused. After all the work they have put in the 6.7 I don't see them changing engines again anytime soon.
 
  #37  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:01 PM
PSDlongbox's Avatar
PSDlongbox
PSDlongbox is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to throw this out there, the 6.0 was not built for it's release date power output. Ford couldn't release a lower hp/trq rating in the diesel wars with GM so they pushed the output past the intended original rating on the engine. This is what I was told. Hence the fact that it was designed with less and weaker head bolts than needed. I think the the cab and chassis 6.0 were rated lower than the consumer trucks, no?
 
  #38  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:24 PM
redford's Avatar
redford
redford is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stephensville WI
Posts: 23,082
Received 1,565 Likes on 913 Posts
Originally Posted by PSDlongbox
Just to throw this out there, the 6.0 was not built for it's release date power output. Ford couldn't release a lower hp/trq rating in the diesel wars with GM so they pushed the output past the intended original rating on the engine. This is what I was told. Hence the fact that it was designed with less and weaker head bolts than needed. I think the the cab and chassis 6.0 were rated lower than the consumer trucks, no?
The horsepower rating on the chassis/cab trucks is measured differently, which is why you see a lower HP figure. No difference in the drive train at all.
 
  #39  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:46 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by PSDlongbox
Just to throw this out there, the 6.0 was not built for it's release date power output. Ford couldn't release a lower hp/trq rating in the diesel wars with GM so they pushed the output past the intended original rating on the engine. This is what I was told. Hence the fact that it was designed with less and weaker head bolts than needed. I think the the cab and chassis 6.0 were rated lower than the consumer trucks, no?
Sheer speculation and conjecture at its finest. Navistar wouldn't warrant an engine that was made to make more power than it was designed for. But they did, which blows that theory out of the water.

Of course there was a big lawsuit over Navistar denying some claims, but if your statement was correct there would be no claims filed because there would be no warranty.
 
  #40  
Old 08-05-2013, 06:11 PM
PSDlongbox's Avatar
PSDlongbox
PSDlongbox is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Crazy001
Sheer speculation and conjecture at its finest. Navistar wouldn't warrant an engine that was made to make more power than it was designed for. But they did, which blows that theory out of the water.

Of course there was a big lawsuit over Navistar denying some claims, but if your statement was correct there would be no claims filed because there would be no warranty.
just something I had heard on more than one occasion, didn't know if it was truth or bs.
 
  #41  
Old 08-05-2013, 06:30 PM
Snowseeker's Avatar
Snowseeker
Snowseeker is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stevens Point, WI
Posts: 13,471
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
I am one of those guys that sits back and waits for other to try this stuff out then buy the best one. I'm gonna be waiting awhile for another new one!

I'd like to see a cat in a ford it would be interesting if nothing else.
 
  #42  
Old 08-05-2013, 06:37 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by PSDlongbox
just something I had heard on more than one occasion, didn't know if it was truth or bs.
I believe it, and I guess it just bugs me how internet rumors like that just won't die, that's all.
 
  #43  
Old 08-05-2013, 08:15 PM
Misky6.0's Avatar
Misky6.0
Misky6.0 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ouray, CO
Posts: 5,419
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Saw a brand new 2014 F250 lariat at the dealer with the 6.7 psd.
 
  #44  
Old 08-05-2013, 09:56 PM
CarlT100's Avatar
CarlT100
CarlT100 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Altamonte Springs, FL
Posts: 3,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is no change of engine in the near future that I can see.
 
  #45  
Old 08-06-2013, 04:36 AM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by 1992FordF150Custom
i heard that the super duty is probably getting a cat engine in 2014, is this true?
False

Caterpillar no longer makes on road diesel due to the fact they are sick of trying to meet emissions. Also, Ford went to CAT back in 06 and asked about building them a light truck engine. CAT told ford, they could NOT keep up with their engine demands.,that ford sells more diesel pickups in ONE year, than CAT even makes diesel engines for ALL their applications. And besides, I think Ford has hit a home run with the 6.7
 


Quick Reply: Is the Super Duty getting a Cat diesel engine for 2014?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 AM.