When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Why waste the money to only get 10% of use out of something
Then why do new trucks come with rear disc? Not really a wate of money if you figure the OP is gonna be at least $100 deep when he needs to buy all new stuff any how.
Rear disc is worth it every time. The front may do 90% of the stopping but increasing rear brake efficiency will improve stop times and brake life.
Explorer swaps will work ... it's also the exact same setup on 92-up crown vic rears. If you research bolt on 9" rear brake setups, most will fit, because the 9" big bearing axles use the same flange as a 8.8" axle.
I'm going to try to retrofit a set of 97-up rear discs onto my 95 ... the biggest issue with that is it requires 16" or larger ... but that clears JUST FINE in my 17x9" wheels ...
The setup that smokin' is using is a popular setup, it uses the Eldorado calipers, if you dont need a parking brake, you can use calipers off the front of an 88 Chevy s10... they fit identically ...
I was up in the air between the Explorer discs and the TSM kit. I ended up going with the TSM kit b/c of simplicity and I don't have a lathe laying around, so I would have been paying someone to do the machining. I wish I could remember where I saw the full write up on the Explorer rear discs. I think it might have been Ryan McCormick that did the write up.
I'd do the explorer swap just for the fact its OE parts, backing plates bolt right up. Ive often though about using the stuff from a 94+ mustang as well, not sure how the spacing would work though.
I was up in the air between the Explorer discs and the TSM kit. I ended up going with the TSM kit b/c of simplicity and I don't have a lathe laying around, so I would have been paying someone to do the machining. I wish I could remember where I saw the full write up on the Explorer rear discs. I think it might have been Ryan McCormick that did the write up.
I'd do the explorer swap just for the fact its OE parts, backing plates bolt right up. Ive often though about using the stuff from a 94+ mustang as well, not sure how the spacing would work though.
That is why I was considering the Explorer swap. In the end I just didn't have the right tools for the job, so I went the bolt on route and am happy with it.
Why waste the money to only get 10% of use out of something
Most figures say the fronts do approx 65-75% of braking ... not 90%
I don't see the point in running rear disc setups on trucks like my F350 4 door longbox, my daily driver 87 F150, or any of my 4x4's. The factory drum setups are all in working order. On the two trucks that i go autocorssing with, my 89S10 and my 95 F150, i see the rear discs as a valuable setup. The bigger, the better is the name of the game with autocrossing, and thats why im going with the larger 99 F150 setup on the rears, and Corvette 13" disc brakes on the rear of my S10.
If i bought a new old truck, pulled the rear drums apart, and found a sloppy mess that would require replacement of EVERYTHING, i would price out the factory drum replacement parts, price out the disc brake conversion, and weigh the options.
Something to consider, if you do a rear disc setup, you'll need to change or modify your proportioning valve ...
That is why I was considering the Explorer swap. In the end I just didn't have the right tools for the job, so I went the bolt on route and am happy with it.
For me its no question, i have the lathe and the mill. And a buddy parting out his 97 explorer. And a 220k truck that is coming home saturday with a leaking axle seal. All lines up perfectly for a disc swap. I need to replace the seals, bearings and brakes anyhow. Seems like a good time to do it. Figure i'll have about $150 after everything is done. Yes its more then shoes and drums, but not much.
Most figures say the fronts do approx 65-75% of braking ... not 90%
I don't see the point in running rear disc setups on trucks like my F350 4 door longbox, my daily driver 87 F150, or any of my 4x4's. The factory drum setups are all in working order. On the two trucks that i go autocorssing with, my 89S10 and my 95 F150, i see the rear discs as a valuable setup. The bigger, the better is the name of the game with autocrossing, and thats why im going with the larger 99 F150 setup on the rears, and Corvette 13" disc brakes on the rear of my S10.
If i bought a new old truck, pulled the rear drums apart, and found a sloppy mess that would require replacement of EVERYTHING, i would price out the factory drum replacement parts, price out the disc brake conversion, and weigh the options.
Something to consider, if you do a rear disc setup, you'll need to change or modify your proportioning valve ...
Deleting the proportioning valve and using an adjustable one is the best route. Summit has a wilwood knock off that looks indentical to my wilwood ones but for about $25 and works the same. Takes some tinkering but once its done you dont have to screw with it.
Deleting the proportioning valve and using an adjustable one is the best route. Summit has a wilwood knock off that looks indentical to my wilwood ones but for about $25 and works the same. Takes some tinkering but once its done you dont have to screw with it.
I've used them, it's nice. If you're using a FACTORY disc brake swap, get the prop valve from whatever the rear brakes came off of ... Aftermarket setups, use the adj prop valve ...
Might I suggest the 8.8" rearend from a 1995 Crown Vic?
IIRC, they have the rear disks....For 1 yr, and again, I-I-R-C....And SHOULD have the width part pretty much dead on....Only differences would be the car is a 28 spline axle, and the truck is a 31....
And the small fact it, like the Explorer, has the 4.5'' Bolt pattern...
You guys need to reread some of the posts... We said we were going to remachine the correct bolt pattern into the explorer rotors. We never said we were trying to bolt the explorer rear axle into our trucks.
You guys need to reread some of the posts... We said we were going to remachine the correct bolt pattern into the explorer rotors. We never said we were trying to bolt the explorer rear axle into our trucks.
I was giving the axle setup from a CV, as a better candidate.....Axle tubes, overall wdth of the axle should be close to a trucks'.....So it'd be a near bolt on deal....
I have no #'s to go on, besides the spline count, and the bolt patterns..
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.