When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You have mass air. If you had speed density, you would have two seperate hoses from the air box all the way to the throttle body and no sensor in the hoses.
Jon
1989 F-150 XL- 4x4, 302, M50D
1995 Bronco Eddie Bauer- 351W, E40D
MAF is a little better in accepting mods like a cam/heads/intake and the like. I think they get a touch better mileage or emissions because they were used on CALI emissions 1995 4.9L and 5.8L trucks and all 95 5.0 automatics. SD is a decent system I think, I wouldn't change it costs 700 or so to change and is kind of difficult. Unless you plan on some super mods stay with what you have. The SD is tunable too, they have some SD friendly cams out there and with a chip it can take most head/intake mods. You can put a supercharger on a SD truck and be fine too. But unless your doing some large mods (the heads, intake etc.) you can do just fine with what you have.
Primary rig is Green Thunder:
95' F-150 XLT 4x4, 302, 5 spd, MSD 6A, Flowmaster Exhaust, Sunroof, Clear corners w/ Diamond headlights, CD player with 2 10" subs and some 32" BFG Muds .
Thats pretty much what I figured Thanks for the 411. I don't really plan on gettin crazy. I have had the truck from new (I ordered it) IT's pretty quick stock.
Small correction on MustangGT's...I'm not sure what the deal on the 95 5.0 is with s/d and maf because I know a few guy's with 95 5.0's with S/D and some with MAF...all with different variation's on the tranny to some have auto with s/d some have manual with s/d and same with MAF...I'm wondering if maybe the switched to MAF on the 5.0 like in 95 1/2?