About that Bosch CP4 on your Ford 6.7
#1
About that Bosch CP4 on your Ford 6.7
I found this tonight while surfing and I thought it might be of interest to those of you that love the injection system of your turbo diesel... and the history.
I found it a good read.
Advanced Diesel Common Rail Systems for Future Emission Legislation
I found it a good read.
Advanced Diesel Common Rail Systems for Future Emission Legislation
#2
#4
So I found while this while searching HPFP failures in Canada. It's a combined US forces fuel test on the Ford 6.7 Scorpion. They use 4 different fuels of varying lubricity to determine the affect of fuels on modern high pressure common rail fueling systems. Page 6 is where the post test analysis begins. This may not be a real world test as they only ran the motors for 220 hours but it was a good read. Sorry if this has been posted before.
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...c=GetTRDoc.pdf
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...c=GetTRDoc.pdf
#5
So I found while this while searching HPFP failures in Canada. It's a combined US forces fuel test on the Ford 6.7 Scorpion. They use 4 different fuels of varying lubricity to determine the affect of fuels on modern high pressure common rail fueling systems. Page 6 is where the post test analysis begins. This may not be a real world test as they only ran the motors for 220 hours but it was a good read. Sorry if this has been posted before.
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...c=GetTRDoc.pdf
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc...c=GetTRDoc.pdf
Guess its not a bad design after all
Jay
#7
In looking at the photo's of the injectors, one or two of them appears to already have an annular ring of rust forming on the injector? Wasn't rust how Rikatics's truck got D'Q'd from warranty coverage by Ford? Just wondering out loud
What would you suggest, Jay, to test this system to the point of failure, for analysis purposes?
Trending Topics
#8
It's a given when you look at the density of the fuel, and the calories per gallon of fuel, almost 140k cals per gallon of D2. There was even more energy in old D2 at 5000ppm sulfur, before ULSD.
#9
#10
#11
#12
That was a good read on the Mil testing. As a retired soldier I can tell you there is alot of questionable fuel that we used to put these things through.
Since I am no longer in the enviroment I cannot speak to the current fuels used but as much as things change they also stay the same.
I don't believe that the components will hold up in real world conditions in third world countries.
Since I am no longer in the enviroment I cannot speak to the current fuels used but as much as things change they also stay the same.
I don't believe that the components will hold up in real world conditions in third world countries.
#13
#14
That was a good read on the Mil testing. As a retired soldier I can tell you there is alot of questionable fuel that we used to put these things through.
Since I am no longer in the enviroment I cannot speak to the current fuels used but as much as things change they also stay the same.
I don't believe that the components will hold up in real world conditions in third world countries.
Since I am no longer in the enviroment I cannot speak to the current fuels used but as much as things change they also stay the same.
I don't believe that the components will hold up in real world conditions in third world countries.
#15
I have also been deployed to bare base ops and the fuel we received was treated exactly as it would be at a stateside base. Just want people to know that if the fuel ever failed a quality test it was isolated and disposed of and all systems cleaned, that goes for ground fuel (DF-1, DF-2, unleaded etc...) as well.