1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What gives with "remove and discard... replace with new" for bolts, etc?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-03-2011, 03:54 PM
swengle's Avatar
swengle
swengle is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What gives with "remove and discard... replace with new" for bolts, etc?

Was reading through the workshop manual today to find out how much to torque the shock absorber mounting bolts (installed Bilstein shocks this AM). I noticed that for all the hardware the manual stated to discard the original nuts/bolts and replace with new. I have been seeing this in lots of places in reading through the manual. What gives with this?

I can see replacing head bolts and such, but the shock absorber bolts??? I looked up part numbers on the Internet, a full set of replacement bolts/nuts for the shocks would run you upwards of $40!

Curious minds want to know.

Steve
 
  #2  
Old 07-03-2011, 04:22 PM
Kajtek1's Avatar
Kajtek1
Kajtek1 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA Bay Area
Posts: 3,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
IMHO manufacturers 'Play it safe" and mechanics like the idea of using new bolts while gaining extra profit on parts mark ups. I've been using the same bolts for hundreds times in some applications and although the threads might wear out over the years, those situation are extreme.
The only bolts that require replacement after each removal are stress bolts used in some applications on the engine. To my knowledge SuperDuty don't have such.
 
  #3  
Old 07-03-2011, 04:40 PM
dchamberlain's Avatar
dchamberlain
dchamberlain is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scio, OR
Posts: 8,174
Received 664 Likes on 424 Posts
Ford used stretchy head bolts (technically knows as "Torque to Yield") in a lot of applications, including the 6.0L and 6.4L diesel engines. I don't know what other engines, but I seem to recall them telling me they couldn't reuse the head bolts on my '93 T-Bird 3.8L V6.

Probably, somewhere sometime ago, a bolt broke on some important suspension part, someone got hurt, someone sued and it cost someone a lot of money. So the recommendation became to replace the bolts, to try to reduce the future liability.
 
  #4  
Old 07-03-2011, 06:14 PM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
There are applications where I like to replace an OEM bolt with a Class 10.9 or 12.9.

If they don't have to be metric, I like Grade 8's best. They aren't all that much more costly when buying bolts and nuts.

I'm fortunate to have a supplier nearby that has a great selection of all this stuff.

Pop
 
  #5  
Old 07-03-2011, 06:22 PM
bill64's Avatar
bill64
bill64 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
torque to yield bolts are used to get a good averge torque load on a given object...i guess the engineers did not like torque wrentches. torque to yield bolts require you to torque to a certain ft. lb and from there continue turning the fastener a certain amount of degreee's using a degree wheel or estimating it, but you can surely feel the fastener give or streach while doing so...like it is no longer tightening, just streching, it sure can be felt while doing this
 
  #6  
Old 07-03-2011, 09:56 PM
bpounds's Avatar
bpounds
bpounds is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Whittier, CA
Posts: 17,016
Received 52 Likes on 41 Posts
The idea is that used bolts will not torque properly using the standards applied to new bolts. So anywhere torque value is critical, you should use a new bolt.

But, I agree with you that on shocks it is silly to throw away perfectly good used bolts. But I've never used a torque wrench on a shock bolt either. All this torque this and torque that is ridiculous, and experienced mechanics know when it matters, and when it doesn't. When it doesn't just inspect the bolts, clean the threads if they need it, and reuse.
 
  #7  
Old 07-03-2011, 10:27 PM
SpringerPop's Avatar
SpringerPop
SpringerPop is offline
Hotshot

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: La La Land
Posts: 17,986
Received 188 Likes on 112 Posts
Originally Posted by bpounds
experienced mechanics know when it matters, and when it doesn't. When it doesn't just inspect the bolts, clean the threads if they need it, and reuse.
Sound advice, Bill!

Reps to you!

Pop
 
  #8  
Old 07-03-2011, 11:07 PM
RUNVS's Avatar
RUNVS
RUNVS is offline
FTE Chapter Leader
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I completely agree that it is not necessary to replace the shock bolts. Head bolts, for instance, rely completely on the tensile strength of the bolt to hold down the heads.

However, shock bolts are a side-force load (shear). Unless the bolts were originally tightened to yield - which deforms them - they should be fine to reuse.
 
  #9  
Old 07-05-2011, 04:21 PM
mwsF250's Avatar
mwsF250
mwsF250 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wayyy NoCal, USA
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Why do we engineers say to replace?
Some are designed to be "torque to yield" for optimal function - like head bolts. But others are not. On those, there is another reason:

Because many "mechanics" are too clueless or lazy to use torque wrenches.

Apply more torque than recommended and the bolt WILL stretch and weaken. Each time it is overtorqued, it gets weaker. Eventually it will fail (break).

If it is a critical bolt that could result in an handling or safety issue, it is a big deal.

We can't stop the idiots, but we can at least try to minimize their damage.

Things like suspension bolts tend to get WAILED on by gorillas with impact wrenches so they are more likely than most to be damaged.
 
  #10  
Old 07-05-2011, 07:54 PM
98SurplusExpy's Avatar
98SurplusExpy
98SurplusExpy is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: N. Carolina
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been wondering this myself .... I'm getting ready to replace my brake rotors and the FSM says to replace the caliper mount bolts. These bolts are pretty substantial too! I plan on reusing them ... may add a little blue loctite.

I reused my shock hardware also when I changed my shocks.
 
  #11  
Old 07-05-2011, 08:25 PM
lakedweller's Avatar
lakedweller
lakedweller is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryville (Mur Vul), TN
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
had to replace the bolts on my Reese rails for my 5th wheel hitch when I changed trucks. I would have replaced them even if they had not recommended it. Lot of stress and new bolts seemed like the way to go.....
 
  #12  
Old 07-08-2011, 12:49 PM
Powerstroke_wannabe's Avatar
Powerstroke_wannabe
Powerstroke_wannabe is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 98SurplusExpy
Been wondering this myself .... I'm getting ready to replace my brake rotors and the FSM says to replace the caliper mount bolts. These bolts are pretty substantial too! I plan on reusing them ... may add a little blue loctite.

I reused my shock hardware also when I changed my shocks.
I replaced my front pads & rotors and like you I noticed the manual instructed to replace the caliper mount bolts. So off I went to the local parts house to get the bolts. Unfortunately, the parts house didn't carry the bolts and was told it was a dealer only part. So off I went to the local dealership. Again no bolts in stock. I checked with two other dealerships and only one had two of the four bolts I needed. So I decided to go ahead and get the two bolts and keep them just in case I needed them. All three dealerships are large with heavy volume Super Duty service departments. I know they do a lot of brake service work. When I asked if they were just out of stock of the bolts the parts guy looked in the system and told me they hardly ever get a request for this particular item and it was a very low demand item. Now if the brake techs were strictly following the manual, this item would be a fairly high demand part. This tells me the service departments of the three dealerships I checked are only replacing these caliper mount bolts if the bolts are visibly damaged.

The two new bolts I obtained each had blue thread locker on the threads. So I inspected my removed bolts for damage, put blue loctite thread locker on the threads, and reinstalled them.

Just wanted to pass along my experience.
 
  #13  
Old 07-08-2011, 06:25 PM
fmtrvt's Avatar
fmtrvt
fmtrvt is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Jersey Shore Not Seaside!
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It has to do with the blue thread locking compound or in the case of a nut, self locking feature. And of course the lawyers so that if there is a loss of a critical bolt and subsequent accident the "I told you so" escape clause was intact.

The problem with trying to use Loctite on the bolts that had the blue thread-locker is the integrity is not guaranteed.

Keep in mind that all those torque values given in the service manuals for these types of bolts consider the OE thread locking compound or nut deformation / compound / ect. So if you are torquing a bolt where the blue thread-locker is being "reused" or after cleaning an aftermarket compound that is liquid you are actually over torquing and stressing the bolt.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Adirondacker
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
80
04-04-2015 07:37 AM
ltng7679
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
2
01-17-2015 04:25 PM
aaedin
Excursion - King of SUVs
5
12-08-2014 12:12 PM
chrison600
Brakes, Steering, Suspension, Tires, & Wheels
0
08-25-2012 05:16 PM
b2trausch
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator
1
10-23-2007 08:36 AM



Quick Reply: What gives with "remove and discard... replace with new" for bolts, etc?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.