Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

O2 sensor, compression ?'s...and more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2011 | 06:14 PM
  #1  
outdoorfan's Avatar
outdoorfan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
O2 sensor, compression ?'s...and more

I just purchased a '95 f150 with 302 and e4od tranny. It has 162,000 miles on it. I've been looking it over and going through some of the stuff. I've no where near gotten though all of it, but so far I have been puzzled by one thing in particular.

This truck doesn't have a conventional exhaust system. It does have the stock manifolds, but then there looks to be an aftermarket y-pipe with an O2 sensor tied into it. After that is a glass pack followed by dual exhaust. There's no cat or the air tube that I've seen on other models like this.

The O2 sensor has two wires, and I thought that was kinda strange since I've been reading that it should have four. Well, I borrowed my brother's scanner and hooked it up this afternoon. Turns out the computer isn't even reading the O2 sensor. It's staying in open loop and there's no voltage being generated from it. However, I've already verified that the engine generally runs pretty well and gets reasonable gas mileage (15-16 highway at 55-65 mph).

I also pulled the plugs when doing a compression test and they didn't look rich at all (actually kinda lean). This does not compute in my understanding of how these things work. There's no check engine light on either, although we did pull a 332 (EGR flow insufficient) code and 411 (cannot control rpm), as well. I think the idle problem is coming from a bad IAC valve. I noticed it was disconnected, and when I plugged it back in the idle went up a bit too high.

Also, the compression test I did showed the following marks:

1. 148, then 152 after cranking a few more times
2. 149, then 162 after cranking a few more times
3. 123, then 125 after cranking a few more times
4. 126, then 145 after cranking a few more times
5. 155
6. 158
7. 171
8. 165

What happened is I tested cylinders 5-8 first. I allowed each to crank the same amount of times, and then took the reading. When I got to #1 on the other side it only read 148, so I (for kicks and giggles) cranked it a few more times with the pressure from the previous cranking still in the system. I did that for #'s 1-4, and on # 3 I did a wet test as well. The numbers didn't change much on #3. Cylinders 3 & 4 seem a bit weak. Engine runs fine and shows 18-19 inches of vacuum at idle with very little movement.

I will say that overall the truck seems slow compared to another one that I recently was able to look at that actually had higher miles. They both are extended cab short box with 302 and auto tranny, 3.31 gears. The only difference is that mine has the e4od and the other one has the 4R70W. Somehow I think there's a chance every thing is not running quite right with mine, and I need some advice on what might be going on with it.

Also forgot to mention that the fuel pressure is good/normal from both tank's fuel pumps. The computer said that the timing was at 12 degrees. I understand that 10 is where the factory put it even though some run it up to 13-15. I haven't yet inspected the cap/roter, but I have verified that there's no crossfiring/grounding due to no firworks under the hood in the dark. The spark plugs are worn but not too bad (Motorcraft) and the plug wires are 8mm.

To summarize:

1. Can't figure out why the computer is not reading any voltage from the oxygen sensor, staying in open loop, yet getting reasonable gas mileage. Spark plugs are showing that it's not running rich. Also, there's only two wires protruding from the O2 sensor, but I haven't yet traced them to see where they go to.

2. Seems to have weak compression on cylinders 3 & 4, yet engine idles and runs smoothly.

Thanks.
 
Reply
Old May 14, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
outdoorfan's Avatar
outdoorfan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Well, I'll be darned. An eagle's view (close-up) of something is best. The O2 sensor is a 4-wire. From the top it looked like two until I crawled underneath and looked specifically at it and realized there were two more wires hiding beneath the top two.

I also hooked up the voltmeter to it and confirmed that it was sending out a voltage signal and that that signal was switching back and forth. Why the computer scan didn't show that and why it says it's staying in open look I would sure like to know the answers to.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 12:32 AM
  #3  
ford2go's Avatar
ford2go
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,476
Likes: 224
From: Frequently frozen MN
Some guesses
You COULD have a coolant temp sensor, or possibly an air temp sensor ( if you have one) that's bad. Then it will never go into closed loop because the computer doesn't know if it's warmed up.

I would think that would give you a code

One cylinder does seem consistently weak.

I'm not sure about 95s. Are they still TFI ignition? If they are, you have to disconnect the SPOUT connector to check the base timing -- you didn't mention that you did that.

hj
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 07:42 AM
  #4  
outdoorfan's Avatar
outdoorfan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
I will be getting a Haynes manual soon, and then I'll start testing the sensors to make sure they're within specs. I suppose I was short sighted by assuming the "open loop" had to do with the O2 sensor.

Timing wasn't checked in the conventional method with the spout thingy and timing gun. I simply read what the computer scanner was reading. I'm assuming it would be the same figures, but I don't know. Anyone care to comment on this one?
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
What scanner did you use and where did you connect it? The reason I ask is because the info you gathered with it generally isn't available from the OBD-1 system which this truck should have, so that makes me think that either you actually have a '96 truck with OBD-2 or the data from the scanner is wrong and can be ignored.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2011 | 11:27 PM
  #6  
outdoorfan's Avatar
outdoorfan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Well, I borrowed my brother's scanner. It's one of the good ones that has the various attachments to work with Fords, Chevys, etc... Brand name, I don't know. I've used it before to monitor certain vitals on my wife's '94 Saturn, so I know it's capable of reading O2 sensor voltage on OBDI vehicles.

As to where I plugged it in: the self test port on the inner driver's side underhood right next to the firewall.
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 01:22 AM
  #7  
ford2go's Avatar
ford2go
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,476
Likes: 224
From: Frequently frozen MN
Sounds like your scanner was good enough to tap into the ' data stream ' that some Fords apparently had -- don't know much about it.

But, if you do have the TFI style ignition, you have to disconnect the SPOUT to get the 'base timing', no matter how you check it.

The reason is that it disconnects the computer from the timing control. If you don't disconnect the SPOUT, the computer will probably be causing a slight shift in the timing.

hj
 
Reply
Old May 16, 2011 | 08:57 AM
  #8  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by outdoorfan
As to where I plugged it in: the self test port on the inner driver's side underhood right next to the firewall.
OK that's intersting. Still the device may not have interpreted some of the data correctly so it's possible there is nothing wrong with the truck. We now know the there is a proper O2 sensor connected and it seems to get the expected milage so there's not likely to be any major electronic problem. I suggest pulling the codes, if you get an all clear 11 or 111 then that confirms there are no sensor issues. See "doing a self test" at www.fordfuelinjection.com to pull the codes without any special tools.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 17, 2011 | 12:28 PM
  #9  
outdoorfan's Avatar
outdoorfan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Thanks for the replies. There are a couple codes. One of them has to do with the egr. I'll have to pull that off and make sure it's not plugged. The IAC is the other one. Probably need to replace that.

I don't fully understand the timing issue with the spout connector, but I'll read up that since I'm sure there is plenty of info. I do have a timing gun, and I'll check it that way in due time.

I plan to put in a vacuum gauage and a AFR (air-fuel ratio) gauge shortly to help "monitor" things.

I'm brand new to the F150 world. So, lots of learning to be done.
 
Reply
Old May 17, 2011 | 12:32 PM
  #10  
outdoorfan's Avatar
outdoorfan
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Forgot to mention that I can get 17 (maybe 18) mpg with this thing at 55 mph and no load, just being careful on the throttle. With a loaded 5x10 trailer that weighs a couple thousand pounds it'll do 12.5-13, once again at 55 mph. I figure that's within specs.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Schwinn240
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
13
Mar 25, 2010 06:57 PM
swift722
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
17
Feb 6, 2010 08:55 AM
truckfreak69
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
13
Jan 29, 2008 10:26 PM
gov2mod
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
16
Dec 31, 2004 12:44 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE